Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 379–384 | Cite as

When Hypocrisy Undermines the Standing to Blame: a Response to Rossi

  • Kyle G. FritzEmail author
  • Daniel J. Miller
Article
  • 37 Downloads
We aim to offer an argument justifying the Nonhypocrisy Condition on the standing to blame:

NH:R has the standing to blame some other agent S for a violation of some [moral] norm N only if R is not hypocritical with respect to violations of N (Fritz and Miller 2018: 119).

We maintain that the hypocritical blamer has an unfair differential blaming disposition, or DBD: he is unfairly disposed to blame others, but not himself, for violations of some norm N (122). In virtue of this, he implicitly rejects the equality of persons with respect to N, which grounds the right to blame for violations of N. By implicitly rejecting that which grounds this right, the hypocritical blamer forfeits his right to blame for violations of N (125–127).

Benjamin Rossi (2018) has recently offered several criticisms of this view. We defend our account from Rossi’s criticisms and emphasize our account’s unique advantage: explaining why hypocritical blamers lack the standing to blame.

Criticisms and...

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper by Steve McFarlane, Justin Capes, and Maggie O’Brien.

References

  1. Alicke M, Gordon E, Rose D (2013) Hypocrisy: what counts? Philos Psychol 26:673–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell M (2013) The standing to blame: a critique. In: Coates DJ, Tognazzini NA (eds) Blame: its nature and norms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 263–281Google Scholar
  3. Fritz KG, Miller DJ (2018) Hypocrisy and the standing to blame. Pac Philos Q 99:118-139Google Scholar
  4. Fritz KG, Miller DJ (forthcoming) The unique badness of hypocritical blame. Forthcoming in Ergo.Google Scholar
  5. Isserow J, Klein C (2017) Hypocrisy and moral authority. J Ethics Soc Philos 12:191–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Roadevin C (2018) Hypocritical blame, fairness, and standing. Metaphilosophy 49:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rossi B (2018) The commitment account of hypocrisy. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 21:553–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Szabados B, Soifer E (1999) Hypocrisy, change of mind, and weakness of will: how to do moral philosophy with examples. Metaphilosophy 30:60–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Todd P (2019) A unified account of the moral standing to blame. Nous 53:347–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wallace RJ (2010) Hypocrisy, moral address, and the equal standing of persons. Philos Public Aff 38:307–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Policy LeadershipUniversity of MississippiUniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations