Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 205–218 | Cite as

Rethinking the Imposter Phenomenon

  • Shanna SlankEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Imposter Phenomenon—i.e., the phenomenon of feeling like a fraud and like your successes aren’t really yours—is typically construed not just as a crisis of confidence, but as a failure of rationality. On the standard story, “imposters” have bad beliefs about their talents because they dismiss the evidence provided by their successes. Here I suggest that this standard picture could be mistaken, and that these “imposters” may actually be more rational (on average) than non-imposters. Why? Accounting for the non-talent causes of your successes may require you to lower your confidence in your talents, in which case, “imposter” beliefs are rational. I then go on to suggest a second reason to worry about the standard picture: It does not adequately address the possible role that one’s environment has in the production of the phenomenon. To give an example, I hypothesize that environments that host a “culture of genius” can alter our evidential landscape in a way that promotes the Imposter Phenomenon. Finally, I argue that my alternative picture of the Imposter Phenomenon should prompt us to opt for a conception of self-worth that is more deeply tied to virtues like intellectual humility than to relative talent possession.

Keywords

Imposter phenomenon Imposter syndrome Culture of genius Self-worth Intellectual humility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I’m grateful to Harry Brighouse, Gina Schouten, Russ Shafer-Landau, Michael Titelbaum, and audiences at the 2017 APA Pacific meeting and the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy’s 2017 “Values in Science” workshop for their helpful criticisms and suggestions. I owe special thanks to Erin Beeghly for her comments and conversation at the APA Pacific and to Reuben Stern for extensive discussion.

References

  1. Beard J (1990) Personality correlates of the imposter phenomenon: An exploration in gender differences in critical needs. Unpublished masters’s thesis, Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. Brighouse H, Swift A (2014) The place of educational equality in educational justice. In: Meyer K (ed) Education, justice and the human good: Routledge international studies in the philosophy of education. London. Routledge, New York, pp 14–33Google Scholar
  3. Clance PR, Imes SA (1978) The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice 15:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clance PR, O’Toole MA (1987) The imposter phenomenon: an internal barrier to empowerment and achievement. Women Ther 6:3, 51–64Google Scholar
  5. Cozzarelli C, Major B (1990) Exploring the validity of the impostor phenomenon. J Soc Clin Psychol 9:401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flewelling AL (1985) The impostor phenomenon in individuals succeeding in self-perceived atypical professions: the effects of mentoring and longevity. Unpublished master's thesis. Georgia State University, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  7. Gheaus A (2015) Three cheers for the token women! J Appl Philos 32(2):163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey JC (1981) The impostor phenomenon and achievements: a failure to internalize success. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4969–4970BGoogle Scholar
  9. Harvey JC, Katz C (1985) If I'm so successful, why do I feel like a fake?: the impostor phenomenon, 1st edn. St. Martin's Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawley K (2016) Philosophical reflections on imposter syndrome. A talk given at the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy on 27(07):2016 Available at: https://videoonline.edu.lmu.de/en/sommersemester-2016/8140. Accessed 1 March 2019
  11. Kolligian J Jr, Sternberg RJ (1991) Perceived fraudulence in young adults: is there an “imposter syndrome”. J Pers Assess 56(2):308–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawler KN (1984) The impostor phenomenon in high achieving persons and Jungian personality variables. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International, 45B, 2693Google Scholar
  13. Leslie S-J et al (2015) Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347:262–265.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer M, Cimpian A, Leslie S-J (2015) Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Front Psychol 6:235.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy MC, Dweck CS (2010) A culture of genius: how an Organization’s lay theory shapes People’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 36(3):283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olberding A (06 March 2018). “The Outsider”. Aeon. Last retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/how-useful-is-impostor-syndrome-in-academia on 22 June 2018. Accessed 1 March 2019
  17. Simmons D (2016) Impostor syndrome, a reparative history. Engag Sci Technol Soc 2:106–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sosis C (5 October 2017). “Rebecca Tuvel.” What it’s like to be a philosopher? Last retrieved from http://www.whatisitliketobeaphilosopher.com/rebecca-tuvel/ on 22 June 2018. Accessed 1 March 2019
  19. Tanesini, Alessandra (2016). “Intellectual humility as attitude.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Version of Record online: 4 AUG 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12326

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations