Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 313–329 | Cite as

Are Citizenship Tests Necessarily Illiberal?

  • Michael BlakeEmail author
Article

Abstract

In recent years, many philosophers have argued that it is inherently illiberal to make citizenship for migrants conditional on a test. On these arguments, liberalism itself demands either that no test be administered, or that the test be so easy as to serve merely a symbolic function. In this paper, I make two claims in response to these ideas. The first is that a citizenship test - even a difficult one - is not inherently illiberal, when what is tested for reflects the actual backdrop of knowledge and history required for responsible participation in political discourse. The second is that we have reason to be suspicious of any existing citizenship test, but for reasons of prudence, rather than liberal principle. Existing political elites can be relied upon to make citizenship tests reflect not what is actually required for political agency, but what those elites would like to see reinforced and rein scribed as part of the national identity. Thus, we are right to be wary of citizenship tests - not because liberalism condemns them, but because of predictable moral failures on the part of those charged with writing such tests.

Keywords

Citizenship Migration Tests Liberalism Justice Differentiation 

References

  1. Beerbohm E (2012) Our name: the ethics of democracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beisner R (2009) Dean Acheson: a life in the cold war. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennhold K (2014) Britain increasingly invokes power to disown its citizens. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilefsky D (2016a) Denmark’s tougher citizenship test stumps even its natives. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilefsky D (2016b) Denmark’s new front in debate over immigrants: Children’s lunches. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan J (2012) The Ethics of Voting, paperback edition. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks T (2012) The British citizenship test: the case for reform. Polit Q 83:560–566Google Scholar
  8. Brooks T (2016) Becoming British. Biteback Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Carens J (2013) The ethics of immigration. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Chardy A (2017) Citizenship applications on the rise since Trump’s election. Miami HeraldGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesterton GK (1986) “Orthodoxy.” In his Collected Works, vol 1. New York: Ignatius PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Cresswell T (2014) Place: an introduction. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. De Schutter H, Ypi L (2015) Mandatory Citizenship for Immigrants. Br J Polit Sci 45:235–251Google Scholar
  14. Faulkner W (1951) Requiem for a Nun. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Guly C (2016) “Canada proposes restoring voting rights for long-term expats.” The Guardian 24Google Scholar
  16. Lomasky L, Brennan G (2000) Is there a duty to vote? Soc Philos Policy 17:62–82Google Scholar
  17. Miller D (2016) Strangers in our midst: the political philosophy of immigration. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moser L (2015) “How did a Texas textbook end up describing slaves as ‘workers from Africa’?” SlateGoogle Scholar
  19. Newkirk VR (2017) “How voter ID Laws discriminate.” The AtlanticGoogle Scholar
  20. Pettit P (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawls J (1971) John, A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Renshon S (2009) Noncitizen voting and American democracy. Rowman and Littlefield, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosberg G (1977) Aliens and equal protection: why not the right to vote? Mich Law Rev 75(5/6):1092–1136Google Scholar
  24. Sager A (2012) Political rights, republican freedom, and temporary workers. Crit Rev Int Soc Pol Phil 17:189–211Google Scholar
  25. Shaw J (2007) The transformation of citizenship in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Song S (2009) Democracy and noncitizen voting rights. Citiz Stud 13:607–620Google Scholar
  27. Stephenson N (2003) Quicksilver. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. The Tarnished Golden Door 1980 Civil rights issues in immigration. Report of the United States Commission on Civil RightsGoogle Scholar
  29. Varsanyi M (2005) The rise and fall (and rise?) of non-citizen voting: immigration and the shifting scales of citizenship and suffrage in the United States. Space Polity 9(2):113–134Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations