Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 963–977 | Cite as

Parental Justice and the Kids Pay View

  • Erik MagnussonEmail author
Article

Abstract

In a just society, who should be liable for the significant costs associated with creating and raising children? Patrick Tomlin has recently argued that children themselves may be liable on the grounds that they benefit from being raised into independent adults. This view, which Tomlin calls ‘Kids Pay’, depends on the more general principle that a beneficiary can incur an obligation to share in the cost of an essential benefit that the benefactor is responsible for her requiring. I argue in this paper that this principle is both generally false and particularly suspect in the kinds of cases that Tomlin needs it to be true, namely, cases in which a benefactor has created the need to be benefitted to satisfy a self-regarding interest in providing the benefit. In a nutshell, I argue that because parents (a) electively put their children into a needy circumstance for the purpose of (b) satisfying a self-regarding interest in meeting their children’s needs, they lack a legitimate claim against their children to share in its associated costs.

Keywords

Parental justice Kids pay Principle of fair play Benefit foisting Patrick Tomlin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments and discussion on previous drafts, I am grateful to Serena Olsaretti and Isabella Trifan. Research for this project was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) project on Justice and the Family: An Analysis of the Normative Significance of Procreation and Parenting in a Just Society (Grant number: 648610; grant acryonym: Family Justice).

References

  1. Alstott A (2004) No exit: what parents owe their children and what society owes parents. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Arneson R (1982) The principle of fairness and free rider problems. Ethics 92(4):616–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bou-Habib P (2013) Parental subsidies: the argument from insurance. Polit Philos Econ 12(2):197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casal P (1999) Environmentalism, procreation, and the principle of fairness. Public Affairs Q 13(4):363–376Google Scholar
  5. Casal P, Williams A (2004) Equality of Resources and Procreative Justice. In: Burley J (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Blackwell, Malden, MassGoogle Scholar
  6. Clayton M (2006) Justice and legitimacy in upbringing. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feinberg J (1992) Wrongful life and the counterfactual element in harming. In: Freedom and fulfillment: philosophical essays. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  8. Folbre N (2001) The invisible heart. New Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. George R (1987) Who should bear the costs of children? Public Affairs Q 1(1):1–42Google Scholar
  10. Hart HLA (1955) Are there any natural rights? Philos Rev 64(2):175–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heyd D (1992) Genethics: moral issues in the creation of people. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  12. Klosko G (1987) Presumptive benefit, fairness, and political obligation. Philos Public Aff 16(3):241–259Google Scholar
  13. Liverpool Victoria (2015) The cost of raising a child. http://www.lv.com/assets/life/pdfs/life-insurance/coac-2015-infographic-compressed.pdf Accessed 20 October 2017
  14. Lotz M (2017) Liberalism and the status of family-making. In: Ahlberg J, Cholbi M (eds) Procreation, Parenthood, and Educational Rights. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. McDermott D (2004) Fair play obligations. Political Stud 52(2):216–232Google Scholar
  16. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsaretti S (2013) Children as public goods? Philos Public Aff 41(3):226–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olsaretti S (2009) Responsibility and the consequences of choice. Proc Aristot Soc 109:165–188Google Scholar
  19. Rakowski E (1991) Equal Justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheffler S (2013) In: Kolodny N (ed) Death and the afterlife. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Shiffrin S (1999) Wrongful life, procreative responsibility, and the significance of harm. Legal Theory 5:117–148Google Scholar
  23. Simmons AJ (1979) The principle of fair play. Philos Public Aff 8(4):307–337Google Scholar
  24. Tomlin P (2015) Should kids pay their own way? Political Stud 63(3):663–678Google Scholar
  25. Vallentyne P (2002) Equality and the duties of procreators. In: Archard D, Macleod CM (eds) The moral and political status of children. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LawUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations