Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 341–358 | Cite as

Power, Situation, and Character: A Confucian-Inspired Response to Indirect Situationist Critiques

Article

Abstract

Indirect situationist critiques of virtue ethics grant that virtue exists and is possible to acquire, but contend that given the low probability of success in acquiring it, a person genuinely interested in behaving as morally as possible would do better to rely on situationist strategies - or, in other words, strategies of environmental or ecological engineering or control (Doris, 2002, 1998; see also Levy 2012). In this paper, I develop a partial answer to this critique drawn from work in early Confucian ethics and in contemporary philosophy and psychology. From early Confucian ethics, I lean on the concept of li, or ritual. Ritual represents both a set of situational manipulations that are especially effective at directly producing moral behavior and at indirectly cultivating virtue over time, and also a virtue that consists of facility with and expertise in these situational manipulations (Mower 2013; Slingerland, 2011; Sarkissian, 2010; and Hutton, 2006). Appealing to the particular example of social power, I then argue that one is justified in attempting to acquire virtue if one (a) knows that one will frequently encounter circumstances in which purely situationist strategies lose effectiveness, (b) if these circumstances also carry moral urgency: the risk of great harm or opportunity for great benefit to others is high, and (c) if utilizing the potent combination of situationist strategies and virtue envisioned by the early Confucians as ritual is possible.

Keywords

Virtue ethics Confucian ethics Situationism Moral psychology 

References

  1. Alcoff LM (2007) Epistemologies of ignorance: three types. In: Sullivan S, Tuana N (eds) Race and epistemologies of ignorance. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 39–58Google Scholar
  2. Ames R (2011) Confucian role ethics: a vocabulary. Chinese University Press, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  3. Angle SC (2014) The analects and moral theory. In: Olberding A (ed) The Dao companion to the analects. Springer, New York, pp 225–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanassoulis N (2000) A response to Harman: virtue ethics and character traits. Proc Aristot Soc 100:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Back Y (2018) Virtue and the good life in the early Confucian traidtion. J Relig Ethics 46:37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bretzke J (1995) The Tao of Confucian virtue ethics. Int Philos Q 35:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chong KC (2006) Virtue and rightness: a comparative account. In: Chong KC, Liu Y (ed) Conceptions of virtue: East and West. Marshall Cavendish, Singapore, pp 59–77Google Scholar
  8. Ciurria M (2014) Answering the situationist challenge: a defense of virtue ethics as preferable to other ethical theories. Dialogue 53:651–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Code L (2004) The power of ignorance. Philos Pap 33:291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crisp R (1996) Modern moral philosophy and the virtues. In: Crisp R (ed) How should one live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  11. Cua A (2003) Confucianism: ethics. In: Cua A (ed) Encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 72–79Google Scholar
  12. Dietze P, Knowles ED (2016) Social class and the motivational relevance of other human beings: evidence from visual attention. Psychol Sci 27:1517–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doris J (1998) Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs 32:504–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doris J (2002) Lack of character: personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driver J (1996) The virtues and human nature. In: Crisp R (ed) How should one live? Essays on the virtues. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–129Google Scholar
  16. Epley K (2015) Care ethics and Confucianism: caring through li. Hypatia 30:881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fingarette H (1998) Confucius: the secular as sacred. Waveland Press, Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleeson W (2001) Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distributions of states. J Pers Soc Psychol 80:1011–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fleeson W, Jayawickreme E (2015) Whole trait theory. J Res Pers 56:82–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fricker M (2009) Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Galinsky AD, Rucker DD, Magee JC (2016) Power and perspective-taking: a critical examination. Spec Issue Confirmatory 67:91–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.12.002 Google Scholar
  22. Gier N (2001) The dancing ru: a Confucian aesthetics of virtue. Philos East West 51:280–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gier N (2004) Whitehead, Confucius, and the aesthetics of virtue. Asian Philos 14:171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham J, Haidt J (2012) Sacred values and evil adversaries: a moral foundations approach. In: Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (eds) The social psychology of morality: exploring the causes of good and evil. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang Y (2005) Some fundamental issues in Confucian ethics: a selective review of encyclopedia of Chinese philosophy. J Chin Philos 32:509-528Google Scholar
  26. Hurka T (2006) Virtuous act, virtuous disposition. Analysis 66:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hursthouse R (1999) On virtue ethics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutton E (2006) Situationism and early Confucian thought. Philos Stud 127:37–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hutton E (2014) Xunzi: the complete text. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutton E (2015) On the “Virtue Turn” and the problem of categorizing Chinese thought. Dao 14:331–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Im M (2015) A good life, an admirable life, or an uncertain life. Dao 14:573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inesi ME, Gruenfeld DH, Galinsky AD (2012) How power corrupts relationships: cynical attributions for others’ generous acts. J Exp Soc Psychol 48:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ing M (2015) The limits of moral maturity. Dao 14:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jayawickreme E, Fleeson W (2017) Does whole trait theory work for the virtues? In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Miller C (eds) Moral psychology, vol. 5: Virtue and character. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 75–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kamtekar R (2004) Situationism and virtue ethics on the content of our character. Ethics 114:458–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kawall J (2009) In defense of the primacy of virtues. J Ethics Soc Philos 3:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lai K (2006) Li in the “Analects”: training in moral competence and the question of flexibility. Philos East West 56:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee M-H (2013) Confucianism, Kant, and virtue ethics. In: Angle SC, Slote M (eds) Virtue ethics and confucianism. Routledge, New York, pp 47–55Google Scholar
  39. Levy N (2012) Ecological engineering: reshaping our environments to achieve our goals. Philos Technol 25:589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li C (1984) The Confucian concept of jen and the feminist ethics of care: a comparative study. Hypatia 9:70–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu Y (2006) The unity of rule and virtue in Confucianism. In: Chong K-C, Liu Y (eds) Conceptions of virtue: East and West. Cavendish Square Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Machery E (2010) The bleak implications of moral psychology. Neuroethics 3:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mcaleer S (2007) An Aristotelian account of virtue ethics; an essay in moral taxonomy. Pac Philos Q 88:208–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Medina J (2013) The epistemology of resistence: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and the social imagination. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merritt M (2000) Virtue ethics and situationist personality psychology. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 3:365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merritt M, Doris J, Harman G (2010) Character. In: Doris J (ed) The moral psychology handbook. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 355–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mills C (2007) White ignorance. In: Sullivan S, Tuana N (eds) Race and epistemologies of ignorance. State University of New York Press, New York, pp 11–28Google Scholar
  48. Mischel W, Shoda Y (1995) A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Pyschological Rev 102:246–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morton A (2013) Bounded Thinking: Intellectual Virtues for Limited Agents. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Mower D (2013) Situationism and Confucian virtue ethics. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 16:113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nadler A, Halabi S, Harapz-Gorodeisky G, Ben-David Y (2010) Helping relations as status relations. In: Mikulincer M, Shaver PR (eds) Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: the better angels of our nature. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Dwyer S (2015) Epistemic elitism, paternalism, and Confucian democracy. Dao 14:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Olberding A (2008) Dreaming of the Duke of Zhou: exemplarism in the analects. J Chin Philos 35:625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Olberding A (2012) Moral exemplars in the analects: the good person is that. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  55. Olberding A (2013) Confucius’ complaints and the analects’ account of the good life. Dao 12:417–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Olberding A (2015) Regret and moral maturity: a response to Michael Ing and Manyul Im. Dao 14:579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Olberding A (2016) Etiquette: a Confucian contribution to moral philosophy. Ethics 126:422–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ortega M (2006) Being lovingly, knowingly ignorant: white feminism and women of color. Hypatia 21:56–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Piff PK, Stancato DM, Côté S et al (2012) Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:4086–4091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramsey J (2016) Confucian role ethics: a critical survey. Philos Compass 11:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rodgers T, Warmke B (2015) Situationism versus situationism. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 18:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosemont HJ (1991) Rights-bearing Individuals and Role-bearing Persons. In: Bockover M (ed) Rules, ritual, and responsibility: essays dedicated to herbert fingarette. Open Court Press, Chicago, pp 71–101Google Scholar
  63. Russell D (2009) Practical intelligence and the virtues. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarkissian H (2010) Confucius and the effortless life of virtue. Hist Philos Q 27:1–16Google Scholar
  65. Sim M (2015) Why Confucius’ ethics is a virtue ethics. In: Besser-Jones L, Slote M (eds) The routledge companion to virtue ethics. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 63–76Google Scholar
  66. Slingerland E (2003) Analects: with selections from traditional commentaries. Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  67. Slingerland E (2011) The situationist critique and early Confucian virtue ethics. Ethics 121:390–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith A (2011) The theory of moral sentiments. Gutenberg Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Snow N (2009) Virtue as social intelligence: an empirically grounded theory. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  70. Sreenivasan G (2013) The situationist critique of virtue ethics. In: Russell D (ed) The Cambridge companion to virtue ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 290–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sreenivasan G (2017) Character education and the rearguard of situationism. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Miller C (eds) Moral psychology, vol. 5, Virtue and Character. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 131–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stellar JE, Manzo VM, Kraus MW, Keltner D (2012) Class and compassion: socioeconomic factors predict responses to suffering. Emot Wash DC 12:449–459Google Scholar
  73. Sullivan S, Tuana N (eds) (2007) Race and epistemologies of ignorance. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  74. Tessman L (2005) Burdened virtues: virtue ethics for liberatory struggles. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thaler R, Sunstein C (2009) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin, City of WestminsterGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomson J-J (1997) The right and the good. J Philos 94:273–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tiwald J (2010) Confucianism and virtue ethics: still a fledgling in Chinese and comparative philosophy. Comp Philos 1:55–63Google Scholar
  78. Tuana N (2006) The speculum of ignorance: the women’s health movement and epistemologies of ignorance. Hypatia 21:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Van Norden BW (2003) Virtue ethics and Confucianism. In: Mou B (ed) Comparative approaches to Chinese philosophy. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 99–121Google Scholar
  80. Van Norden B (2008) Mengzi: with selections from traditional commentaries. Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Norden BW (2013) Towards a synthesis of Confucianism and Aristotelianism. In: Angle SC, Slote M (eds) Virtue ethics and Confucianism. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 56–65Google Scholar
  82. Vargas MR (2018) The social constitution of agency and responsibility: oppression, politics, and moral ecology. In: Oshana M, Hutchinson K, Mackenzie C (eds) The social dimensions of responsibility. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  83. Watson G (1990) On the primacy of character. In: Identity, character, and morality. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 449–469Google Scholar
  84. Whitson JA, Liljenquist KA, Galinsky AD et al (2013) The blind leading: power reduces awareness of constraints. J Exp Soc Psychol 49:579–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wong DB (2015) Early Confucian philosophy and the development of compassion. Dao 14:157–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zagzebski L (2010) Exemplarist virtue theory. Metaphilosophy 41:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zagzebski L (2013) Moral exemplars in theory and practice. Theory Res Educ 11:193–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513485177 Google Scholar
  88. Zagzebski L (2017) Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations