Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 1187–1202 | Cite as

A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice

  • Klara Helene Stumpf
  • Christian U. Becker
  • Stefan Baumgärtner
Article

Abstract

Justice is a contested concept. There are many different and competing conceptions, i.e. interpretations of the concept. Different domains of justice deal with different fields of application of justice claims, such as structural justice, distributive justice, participatory justice or recognition. We present a formal conceptual structure of justice applicable to all these domains. We show that conceptions of justice can be described by specifying the following conceptual elements: the judicandum (that which is to be judged as just or unjust), the community of justice including claim holders and claim addressees, their claims (and obligations), the informational base for the assessment, the principles of justice, and on a more practical level, the instruments of justice. By specifying these conceptual elements of justice, it is possible to analyse and compare different conceptions of justice, to assess their internal consistency, to explore new definitions of justice in an analytical way, and to explicate an idea of justice in a manner that provides concrete links to the relevant context.

Keywords

Conceptual structure of justice Meta-ethics Institutional implementation Ideal and non-ideal theory Empirical justice research Concept and conception 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Marius Christen, Malte Faber, Ina Lehmann, Thomas Petersen, Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and discussion. Financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under grant 01UN1011A is gratefully acknowledged. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (eds) (2003) Just Sustainabilities. Development in an Unequal World. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand S, Sen AK (2000) Human development and economic sustainability. World Dev 28(12):2029–2049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle [EN] (2000) Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York, Translated by R. CrispCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aristotle [POL] (1985) The Politics. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Translated by C. LordGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgärtner S, Faber MM, Schiller J (2006) Joint Production and Responsibility in Ecological Economics. On the Foundations of Environmental Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgärtner S, Becker CU, Frank K, Müller B, Quaas MF (2008) Relating the philosophy and practice of ecological economics. The role of concepts, models, and case studies in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research. Ecol Econ 67:384–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumgärtner S, Glotzbach S, Hoberg N, Quaas MF, Stumpf KH (2012) Economic analysis of trade-offs between justices. Intergenerational Justice Rev 1(2012):4–9Google Scholar
  8. Baumgärtner S, Petersen T, Schiller J (2014) Bringing norms into action: the concept of responsibility. Manuscript Google Scholar
  9. Becker CU (2012) Sustainability Ethics and Sustainability Research. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentham J [1789] (1970) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In: Burns JH, Hart HLA (eds) The collected works of Jeremy Bentham. Athlone Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Birnbacher D (1988) Verantwortung für zukünftige Generationen. Reclam, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Brighouse H (2000) School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Caney S (2005) Justice Beyond Borders. Oxford University Press, Oxford, A Global Political TheoryCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniels N (2013) Reflective equilibrium. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/reflective-equilibrium/. Accessed 05 April 2015
  15. DeGrazia D (2001) Taking Animals Seriously. Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Dellink R, den Elzen M, Aiking H, Bergsma E, Berkhout F, Dekker T, Gupta J (2009) Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(4):411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De-Shalit A (1995) Why Posterity Matters. Environmental Policies and Future Generations. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dobson A (1998) Justice and the Environment. Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doering R, Goti L, Fricke L, Jantzen K (2015, forthcoming) Equity and ITQs: About fair distribution in quota management systems in fisheries. Environmental ValuesGoogle Scholar
  20. Faber M, Petersen T (2008) Gerechtigkeit und Marktwirtschaft – das Problem der Arbeitslosigkeit. Perspekt Wirtsch 9:405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feinberg J (1974) Noncomparative Justice. Philos Rev 83(3):297–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer JM, Ravizza M (1998) Responsibility and Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, A Theory of Moral ResponsibilityCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frankfurt HG (1987) Equality as a moral ideal. Ethics 98(1):21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallie WB (1956) Essentially contested concepts. Proc Aristot Soc 56:167–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardiner SM, Caney S, Jamieson D, Shue H, Gardiner SM (eds) (2010) Climate Ethics. Essential Readings. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodin RE (1986) Responsibilities. Philos Q 36(142):50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gosepath S (2007) Gerechtigkeit. In: Fuchs D, Roller E (eds) Lexikon Politik. Hundert Grundbegriffe. Reclam, Stuttgart, pp. 82–85Google Scholar
  28. Gosepath S (2011) Equality. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/equality Accessed 05 April 2015Google Scholar
  29. Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63(4):309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobbes T [1651] (1997) Leviathan. Authoritative text, backgrounds, interpretations. Edited by R. E. Flathman and D. Johnston. W. W. Norton and Company, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hollis A, Pogge T (2008) The Health Impact Fund. Making New Medicines Accessible for All. Incentives for Global Health, YaleGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobs M (1999) Sustainable development as a contested concept. In: Dobson A (ed) Fairness and Futurity. Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahmann B, Stumpf KH, Baumgärtner S (2015) Notions of justice held by stakeholders of the Newfoundland fishery. Mar Policy 62:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kant I [1788] (1997) Critique of Practical Reason. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Kant I [1788] (1998) Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Werkausgabe in zwölf Bänden, Band VII, edited by W. Weischedel. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)Google Scholar
  35. Kant I [1785] (1998) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated and edited by M. Gregor. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Kant I [1785] (1998) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Werkausgabe in zwölf Bänden, Band VII, edited by W. Weischedel. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt)Google Scholar
  36. Koller P (2007) Der Begriff der Gerechtigkeit. Generationengerechtigkeit! 4/2007:7–11. http://www.generationengerechtigkeit.de/images/stories/Publikationen/gg_25%21_web.pdf. Accessed 05 April 2015Google Scholar
  37. Krebs A (2003) Warum Gerechtigkeit nicht als Gleichheit zu begreifen ist. Deut Z Philos 51(2):235–253Google Scholar
  38. Locke J [1690] (1959) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by A. C. Fraser. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Locke J [1690] (1988) Two Treatises of Government. Edited by P. Lasslett. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. MacIntyre AC (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2. edn. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  41. Martinez-Alier J, Anguelovski I, Bond P, Del Bene D, Demaria F, Gerber JF, Greyl L, Haas W, Healy H, Marín-Burgos V, Ojo G, Firpo Porto M, Rijnhout L, Rodríguez-Labajos B, Spangenberg J, Temper L, Warlenius R, Yánez I (2014) Between activism and science: grassroots concepts for sustainability coined by Environmental Justice Organizations. J Polit Econ 21:19–60Google Scholar
  42. Mazouz N (2006) Gerechtigkeit. In: Düwell M, Hübenthal C, Werner MH (eds) Handbuch Ethik, 2. edn. J. B. Metzler, Stuttgart, pp. 371–376Google Scholar
  43. Meyer L (2010) Intergenerational justice. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/justice-intergenerational/. Accessed 05 April 2015Google Scholar
  44. Mill JS [1871] (1998) Utilitarianism. Edited by R. Crisp. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller D (1992) Distributive justice: What the people think. Ethics 102:555–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller D (1999) Principles of Social Justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Nozick R (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Nussbaum MC (2000) Women and Human Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, The Capabilities ApproachCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ott K (2003) The spectrum of environmental values. In: Ott K, Thapa P (eds) Greifswald’s Environmental Ethics. Steinbeckerverlag Rose, Greifswald, pp. 31–40Google Scholar
  50. Ott K, Döring R (2008) Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit, 2. edn. Metropolis, MarburgGoogle Scholar
  51. Page EA (2007a) Intergenerational justice of what: Welfare, resources or capabilities? Environ Polit 16(3):453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Page EA (2007b) Justice between generations: Investigating a sufficientarian approach. J Glob Ethics 3(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Parfit D (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Parfit D (1997) Equality and priority. Ratio 10(3):197–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petersen T (2009) Nachhaltigkeit und Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. In: von Egan-Krieger T, Schultz J, Thapa P., Voget L (eds) Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit. Ausbau, Anwendung und Kritik. Metropolis, Marburg, pp. 69–84Google Scholar
  56. Pogge TW (2006) Justice. In: Borchert DM (ed) Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan, Detroit, pp. 862–870Google Scholar
  57. Pogge TW (2008) World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2. edn. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  58. Pogge TW, Rimmer M, Rubenstein K (2010) Incentives for Global Public Health. Patent Law and Access to Essential Medicines. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Rawls J (1951) Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. Philos Rev 60(2):177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rawls J (1971) A Theory of Justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Regan T (1983) The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  62. Ringius L, Torvanger A, Underdal A (2002) Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int Environ Agreements: Polit, Law Econ 2(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Risse M (2012) On Global Justice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robeyns I (2008) Ideal theory in theory and practice. Soc Theory Pract 34(3):341–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roemer JE (1996) Theories of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Sandel MJ (2009) Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Scanlon T (1996) The Diversity of Objections to Inequality. University of Kansas, Lawrence, The Lindley LectureGoogle Scholar
  68. Schefczyk M (2012) Verantwortung für historisches Unrecht: Eine philosophische Untersuchung. De Gruyter, Berlin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Schlosberg D (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environ Polit 13(3):517–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schlosberg D, Carruthers D (2010) Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Glob Environ Polit 10(4):12–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schroeder D (2009) Justice and benefit sharing. In: Wynberg R, Schroeder D, Chennells R (eds) Indigenous Peoples. Consent and Benefit Sharing. Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 11–26Google Scholar
  72. Sen AK (1979) Equality of What? The Tanner Lecture on Human Values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 197–220Google Scholar
  73. Sen AK (1990) Justice: Means versus freedoms. Philos Public Aff 19(2):111–121Google Scholar
  74. Sen AK (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  75. Sen AK [1988] (2008) Justice [reprinted from the 1988 edition]. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp. 646–650Google Scholar
  76. Sen AK (2009) The Idea of Justice. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Sievers-Glotzbach S (2013) Ecosystem services and distributive justice. Considering access rights to ecosystem services in theories of distributive justice. Ethics, Policy & Environ 16(2):162–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sikor T (ed) (2013) The Justices and Injustices of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
  79. Singer P (1990) Animal Liberation, 2. edn. New York Review Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Smiley M (2005) Collective responsibility. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/collective-responsibility/. Accessed 05 April 2015Google Scholar
  81. Stemplowska Z (2008) What’s ideal about ideal theory? Soc Theory Pract 34(3):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stumpf KH (2014) Reconstructing the “biopiracy” debate from a justice perspective. In: Lanzerath D, Friele M (eds) Concepts and values in biodiversity. Routledge, Oxon, pp. 225–242Google Scholar
  83. Stumpf KH, Baumgärtner S, Becker CU, Sievers-Glotzbach S (2015) The justice dimension of sustainability. A systematic and general conceptual framework. Sustainability 7(6):7438–7472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor P (1986) Respect for nature. Princeton University Press, Princeton, A Theory of Environmental EthicsGoogle Scholar
  85. Tugendhat E (1993) Vorlesungen über Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  86. Tungodden B (2008) Justice (new perspectives). In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp. 651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Valentini L (2012) Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: a conceptual map. Philos Compass 7(9):654–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vatn A (2005) Institutions and the environment. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  89. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New York, A Defense of Pluralism and EqualityGoogle Scholar
  90. Wolterstorff N (2008) Justice: Rights and Wrongs. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Young IM (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  92. Young HP (1994) Equity in theory and practice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  93. Young IM (2011) Responsibility for justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klara Helene Stumpf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christian U. Becker
    • 3
  • Stefan Baumgärtner
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Sustainability Economics GroupLeuphana University of LüneburgLüneburgGermany
  2. 2.Norbert Elias Center for Transformation Design and ResearchEuropa-University FlensburgFlensburgGermany
  3. 3.College of BusinessColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations