Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 475–487 | Cite as

Prostitution and the Ideal State. A Defense of a Policy of Vigilance

Article

Abstract

The debate concerning prostitution is centered around two main views: the liberal view and the radical feminist view. The typical liberal view is associated with decriminalization and normalization of prostitution; radical feminism stands in favor of prohibition or abolition. Here, I argue that neither of the views is right. My argument does not depend on the plausible (or actual) side effects of prohibition, abolition, or normalization; rather, I am concerned with the ideals involved. I will concede to liberals their claim that prostitution is not harmful in itself. Yet, I will argue that prostitution cannot be thought of as “just another job”. Even if prostitution is not harmful in itself, it can do much harm. I will argue that a policy of vigilance is the most adequate one to adopt with regard of prostitution, given the risk of harm associated with prostitution. A policy of vigilance tries to discriminate between those who take a certain course of action willingly and those who do not. It puts no restraints on those who exercise their genuine will, but protects those who are openly or subtly coerced.

Keywords

Prostitution Liberalism Vigilance Harm 

References

  1. Abel, G. (2010) Decriminalisation: A harm minimisation and human rights approach to regulating sex work, PhD Thesis. Christchurch: University of OtagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel G (2014) A decade of decriminalization: sex work ‘down under’ but not underground. Criminol Crim Justice 14:580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barry K (1995) The prostitution of sexuality: the global exploitation of women. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewis J, Linstead S (2000) ''The worst thing is the screwing” (2): context and career in sex work. Gend Work Organ 7(3):168–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Marneffe P (2010) Liberalism and prostitution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Dworkin A (1997) Prostitution and male supremacy. In: Dworkin A (ed) Life and death. Free Press, New York, pp. 138–216Google Scholar
  7. Ericsson LO (1980) Charges against prostitution: an attempt at a philosophical assessment. Ethics 90:38–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes, Y. (2001) Moral reflections on prostitution. In Essays in Philosophy, 2 (2): The Philosophy of Love and Sex. Mississippi State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Estes Y. (2008) Prostitution: a subjective position. In A. Soble and N. Power (eds.) The philosophy of sex: contemporary readings. 5 edn. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 353–365.Google Scholar
  10. Farley M (2004) “Bad for the body, bad for the heart”: prostitution harms women even if legalized or decriminalized. Violence Against Women 10:1087–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoigard C, Finstad L (1992) Backstreets: prostitution, money, and love. Pennsylvania State University Press, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kilvington J, Day S, Ward H (2001) Prostitution policy in Europe: a time of change? Fem Rev 67:78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGraw LA, Young LJ (2010) The prairie vole: an emerging model organism for understanding the social brain. Trends Neurosci 33:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mill, J.S., (1859) On liberty, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1956Google Scholar
  15. Moen OM (2014) Is prostitution harmful? J Med Ethics 40(2):73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nussbaum M (1998) “Whether from reason or prejudice”: taking money for sexual services. J Leg Stud 27:693–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rössler W., Koch U., Lauber C., Hass A.-K., Altwegg M., Ajdacic-Gross, V., and Landolt, K. (2010) The mental health of female sex workers. Acta Psychiatr Scand 122: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Scambler, G. and Scambler, A. (1997) Afterword, In G. Scambler and A. Scambler (eds.), Rethinking prostitution: purchasing sex in the 1990s. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Smith C, Davidson H (2014) The paradox of generosity: giving we receive, grasping we lose. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sullivan M (2007) Making sex work: a failed experiment with legalised prostitution. Spinifex, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  21. VV. AA. (2000) Consensus statement on the live organ donor. J Am Med Assoc (JAMA), December 13,—Vol 284, No. 22Google Scholar
  22. Weitzer R (2005) New directions in research on prostitution. Crime, Law Soc Chang 43:211–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ikerbasque: Basque Foundation for ScienceBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Linguistics and Basque Studies DepartmentUniversity of the Basque CountryVitoriaSpain

Personalised recommendations