Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 835–849

Situationism and the Neglect of Negative Moral Education

Article

Abstract

This paper responds to the recent situationist critique of practical rationality and decision-making. According to that critique, empirical evidence indicates that our choices (1) are governed by morally irrelevant situational factors and not durable character traits, and (2) rarely result from overt rational deliberation. This critique is taken to indicate that popular moral theories in the Western tradition (i.e., virtue ethics, Kantian ethics, and utilitarian ethics) are descriptively deficient, even if normatively plausible or desirable. But we believe that the situationist findings regarding the sources of, or influences over, our moral agency do not reflect durable features of human nature, and claim that these findings are a byproduct of a deficient approach to moral education. Existing models of moral education, which are “positive” in nature, do a poor job of developing virtuous people. Instead, we argue that a “negative” approach to moral education, traceable to Locke, Smith, and Rousseau, would be more successful. This strategy represents something of a compromise between the strategies adopted by thinkers like Rachana Kamtekar (Ethics: Int J Soc, Polit, Leg Phil 114 (3): 458–491 2004), who argues that traditional moral categories escape largely untouched by findings in social psychology, and John Doris (Noûs 32(4):504–530 1998) and Gilbert Harman (Bus Ethics Q 13 (1): 87–94 2003), who argue that findings in psychology prove our traditional moral theories are defective.

Keywords

Moral education Situationism Social psychology Virtue 

References

  1. Adams RM (2006) A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfano M (2013) Character as moral fiction. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillargeon R (1987) Object permanence in 3½ and 4½ month old infants. Dev Psychol 23:655–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G (2006) Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol Lett 2:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brink DO (2013) Mill’s progressive principles. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cialdini RB, Kenrick DT (1976) Altruism as hedonism: a social developmental perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. J Personal Soc Psychol 34:907–914Google Scholar
  7. Doris JM (2005) Lack of character: personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Doris JM (1998) Persons, situations, and virtue ethics. Noûs 32(4):504–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flanagan OJ (1993) Varieties of moral personality: ethics and psychological realism. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Haidt J (2001) The emotional Dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev 108(4):814–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamlin JK, Wynn K, Bloom P (2007) Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature 450(7169):557–559Google Scholar
  12. Hanley RP (2008) Commerce and corruption Rousseau’s diagnosis and Adam Smith’s cure. Eur J Polit Theory 7(2):137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harford T (2012) Adapt: why success always starts with failure. Picador, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Harman G (2003) No character or personality. Bus Ethics Q 13(1):87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman ML (2000) Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hume, D. (1978) A treatise of human nature. Ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Isen A, Levin P (1972) Effect of feeling good on helping: cookies and kindness. J Pers Soc Psychol 21(3):384–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jansen E, Mulkens S, Jansen A (2007) Do not eat the red food!: prohibition of snacks leads to their relatively higher consumption in children. Appetite 49(3):572–577Google Scholar
  19. Kant, I. (1996) The metaphysics of morals, ed. Mary J. Gregor. 2nd edition. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Katz, Jack (1988) Seductions of crime: moral and sensual attractions of doing evil. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. King, PL (1829) The life of John Locke: with extracts from his correspondence, Journals and common-place books by Lord Peter King. H. ColburnGoogle Scholar
  22. Kristjánsson K (2006) Habituated reason: Aristotle and the ‘paradox of moral education. Theory Res Educ 4(1):101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kristjánsson K (2008) An Aristotelian critique of situationism. Philosophy 83(1):55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kristjánsson K (2010) Educating moral emotions or moral selves: a false dichotomy?”. Educ Phil Theory 42(4):397–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latane B, Rodin J (1969) A lady in distress: inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. J Exp Psychol 5(2):189–202Google Scholar
  26. Lambie JA (2008) On the irrationality of emotion and the rationality of awareness. Conscious Cognit: Int J 17(3):946–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LeMoyne T, Buchanan T (2011) Does “hovering” matter? helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociol Spectr 31(4):399–418Google Scholar
  28. Locke J (1996) Ed. Kenneth Winkler. An essay concerning human understanding. Indianapolis; Cambridge: HackettGoogle Scholar
  29. Locke J (2007) Ed. John William Adamson. Some thoughts concerning education; including of the conduct of the understanding. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Pub., IncGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathews KE, Canon LK (1975) Environmental noise level as a determinant of helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 32(4):571–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCombs B (2010) “Developing responsible and autonomous learners: a key to motivating students.” http://www.apa.org/education/k12/learners.aspx
  32. Mead NL, Baumeister RF, Gino F, Schweitzer ME, Ariely D (2009) Too tired to tell the truth: self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(3):594–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merritt M (2000) Virtue ethics and situationist personality psychology. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 3(4):365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mill, JS (1978) On liberty. 8th edition. Hackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  35. Mill JS (2001) Utilitarianism ed. George Sher. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  36. Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull 126(2):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muraven M, Baumeister RF, Tice DM (1999) Longitudinal improvement of self-regulation through practice: building self-control strength through repeated exercise. J Soc Psychol 139(4):446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neill A (1989) Locke on habituation, autonomy, and education. J Hist Philos 27(2):225–245Google Scholar
  39. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Otis N, Grouzet FME, Pelletier LG (2005) Latent motivational change in an academic setting: a 3-year longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol 97(2):170–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peters RS (1981) Moral Development and Moral Education. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Ross L, Nisbett RE (2011) The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. Pinter & Martin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rousseau J-J (1979) Emile: or, on education. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Samuels SM, Casebeer WD (2005) A social psychological view of morality: Why knowledge of situational influences on behaviour Can improve character development practices. J Moral Educ 34(1):73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schiffrin HH, Liss M, Miles-McLean H, Geary KA, Erchull MJ, Tashner T (2013) Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ Well-Being. J Child Fam Stud. 1–10Google Scholar
  46. Schmidtz D, Brennan J (2010) “Psychological freedom: the final frontier,” in A brief history of liberty. Wiley-Blackwell, 208–243Google Scholar
  47. Schneider FW, Lesko WA, Garrett WA (1980) Helping behavior in hot, comfortable, and cold temperatures: a field study. Environ Behav 12(2):231–240Google Scholar
  48. Schwitzgebel E (2009) Do ethicists steal more books? Philos Psychol 22(6):711–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwitzgebel E, Cushman F (2012) Expertise in moral reasoning? order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and Non-philosophers. Mind Lang 27(2):135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwitzgebel E, Rust J (2014) The moral behavior of ethics professors: relationships among self-reported behavior, expressed normative attitude, and directly observed behavior. Philos Psychol 27(3):293–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sherman DK, Cohen GL, Nelson LD, Nussbaum AD, Bunyan DP, Garcia J (2009) Affirmed yet unaware: exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation. J Pers Soc Psychol 97(5):745–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith A (2002) The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Snow N (2009) Virtue as social intelligence: an empirically grounded theory. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Surprenant CW (2014) Kant and the cultivation of virtue. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of Choice Science. New Series, Vol. 211, No. 4481: 453–458Google Scholar
  57. Vohs KD, Kaikati AM, Kerkhof P, Schmeichel BJ (2009) Self-regulatory Resource Depletion: A Model for Understanding the Limited Nature of Goal Pursuit. In The Psychology of Goals., edited by Gordon B. Moskowitz and Heidi Grant, 423–446. New York, NY US: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations