Advertisement

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 469–485 | Cite as

The Value of Nonhuman Nature: A Constitutive View

  • Roman AltshulerEmail author
Article

Abstract

A central question of environmental ethics remains one of how best to account for the intuitions generated by the Last Man scenarios; that is, it is a question of how to explain our experience of value in nature and, more importantly, whether that experience is justified. Seeking an alternative to extrinsic views, according to which nonhuman entities possess normative features that obligate us, I turn to constitutive views, which make value or whatever other limits nonhuman nature places on action dependent on features intrinsic to human beings and constitutive of them or their obligations. After examining two kinds of constitutive views—environmental virtue ethics and Korsgaard’s Kantianism—I suggest an alternative that takes up the strengths of both while avoiding their shortcomings. On this view, we have an indirect obligation to experience nature as obligating us, although we have direct obligations only to human beings.

Keywords

Environmental ethics Anthropocentrism Value in nature Virtue ethics Korsgaard Velleman 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An early version of this paper was presented at the 2009 meeting of the International Association for Environmental Philosophy in Arlington, VA. I would like to thank the other participants there for their thoughtful feedback, as well as Collin O’Neil and two anonymous reviewers for extremely helpful comments on previous drafts.

References

  1. Bastian B, Costello K, Loughnan S, Hodson G (2011) When Closing the Human-Animal Divide Expands Moral Concern: The Importance of Framing. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. doi: 10.1177/1948550611425106 Google Scholar
  2. Broadie A, Pybus EM (1974) Kant’s Treatment of Animals. Philosophy 49:375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cafaro P (2005) Gluttony, Arrogance, Greed and Apathy: An Exploration of Environmental Vice. In: Cafaro P, Sandler R (eds) Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield, Lantham, pp 135–158Google Scholar
  4. Callicott JB (1989) In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Callicott JB (1999) Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. SUNY Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter A (2004) Projectivism and the Last Person Argument. Am Philos Q 41:51–62Google Scholar
  7. Costello K, Hodson G (2010) Exploring the roots of dehumanization: The role of animal—human similarity in promoting immigrant humanization. Group Process Intergroup Relations 13:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costello K, Hodson G (2012) Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. Br J Soc Psychol. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12016 Google Scholar
  9. Davidson D (1980) Actions, Reasons, and Causes. In: Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  10. Derrida J (1994) Given Time: I. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Counterfeit MoneyGoogle Scholar
  11. Fieldhouse H (2004) The Failure of the Kantian Theory of Indirect Duties to Animals. Anim Lib Philos Policy J 2:1–9Google Scholar
  12. Frasz G (2001) What is Environmental Virtue Ethics that We Should Be Mindful of It? Philos Contemp World 8:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodpaster K (1978) On Being Morally Considerable. J Philos 75:308–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hill TE (1983) Ideals of Human Excellence and Preserving Natural Environments. Environ Ethics 5:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hursthouse R (2007) Environmental Virtue Ethics. In: Ivanhoe PJ, Walker RL (eds) Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 155–171Google Scholar
  16. Kain P (2010) Duties Regarding Animals. In: Denis L (ed) Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 210–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kant I (1987) Critique of Judgment. Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  18. Kant I (1997) Lectures on Ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsgaard C (2004) Fellow Creatures: Kantian Ethics and Our Duties to Animals. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
  20. Korsgaard C (2011) Interacting with Animals: A Kantian Approach. In: Beauchamp TL, Frey RG (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 91–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langford DJ, Bailey AL, Chanda ML, Clarke SE, Drummond TE, Echols S, Glick S, Ingrao J, Klassen-Ross T, LaCroix-Fralish ML et al (2010) Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat Methods 7:447–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leopold A (1966) The Land Ethic. A Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 237–264Google Scholar
  23. McShane K (2007a) Why Environmental Ethics Shouldn’t Give Up on Intrinsic Value. Environ Ethics 29:43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McShane K (2007b) Anthropocentrism vs. Nonanthropocentrism: Why Should We Care? Environ Values 16:169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McShane K, Thompson A, Sandler R (2008) Virtue and Respect for Nature: Ronald Sandler’s Character and Environment. Ethics Place Environ 11:213–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naess A (1973) The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. A Summary. Inquiry 16:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naess A (1985) Identification as a Source of Deep Ecological Attitude. In: Tobias M (ed) Deep Ecology: An Anthology. Avant Books, San Diego, pp 256–270Google Scholar
  28. Naess A (1987) Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World. The Trumpeter 4:35–40Google Scholar
  29. Nolt J (2006) The Move from Good to Ought in Environmental Ethics. Environ Ethics 28:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Neill J (1992) The Varieties of Intrinsic Value. Monist 75:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Regan T (1985) The Case for Animal Rights. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  32. Rolston H (1989) Environmental Ethics: Values in and Duties to the Natural World. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  33. Rolston H (2001) Naturalizing Values: Organisms and Species. In: Pojman L, Pojman L (eds) Environmental Ethics: Readings in Theory and Application. Wadsworth, Belmont, pp 107–119Google Scholar
  34. Rolston H (2005) Environmental Virtue Ethics: Half the Truth but Dangerous as a Whole. In: Cafaro P, Sandler R (eds) Environmental Virtue Ethics. Rowman & Littlefield, Lantham, pp 61–78Google Scholar
  35. Sandler RD (2006) A Theory of Environmental Virtue. Environ Ethics 28:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sandler RL (2007) Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Singer P (2005) Ethics and Intuitions. J Ethics 9:331–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterba J (1998) A Biocentrist Strikes Back. Environ Ethics 20:361–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strawson PF (1962) Freedom and Resentment. Proc Br Acad 48:187–211Google Scholar
  40. Sylvan R (1973) Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental Ethic? Proc 15th World Congr Philos 1:205–210Google Scholar
  41. Taylor P (1986) Respect for Nature. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor A (2008) Examined LifeGoogle Scholar
  43. Treanor B (2008) Narrative Environmental Virtue Ethics: Phronesis without a Phronimos. Environ Ethics 30:361–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Velleman JD (2000) Introduction. In: The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  45. Velleman JD (2009) How We Get Along. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wallace RJ (1994) Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Warren MA (1983) The Rights of the Nonhuman World. In: Elliot R, Gare A (eds) Environmental Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, pp 109–134Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SUNY Stony BrookBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations