Demands of Justice, Feasible Alternatives, and the Need for Causal Analysis
- 325 Downloads
Many political philosophers hold the Feasible Alternatives Principle (FAP): justice demands that we implement some reform of international institutions P only if P is feasible and P improves upon the status quo from the standpoint of justice. The FAP implies that any argument for a moral requirement to implement P must incorporate claims whose content pertains to the causal processes that explain the current state of affairs. Yet, philosophers routinely neglect the need to attend to actual causal processes. This undermines their arguments concerning moral requirements to reform international institutions. The upshot is that philosophers’ arguments must engage in causal analysis to a greater extent than is typical.
KeywordsGlobal justice International institutions Feasibility Causal mechanisms Methodology
Audiences at the Australian National University, University of Michigan, and the Eastern Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association provided helpful feedback on earlier versions. Many thanks to Sean Aas, Elizabeth Anderson, Christian Barry, Zev Berger, Simon Caney, Bob Goodin, Jonathan Harmon, Thomas Pogge, Peter Vallentyne, Leif Wenar, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (award #752-2007-0083) is gratefully acknowledged.
- Caney S (2006) Cosmopolitan justice and institutional design: an egalitarian liberal conception of global governance. Soc Theory Pract 32(4):725–756Google Scholar
- Geertz C (1973) Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight. In: The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hardin R (1982) Collective action. RFF Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Hassoun N (2010) Making the case for foreign aid. Public Aff Q 24(1):1–20Google Scholar
- Hedström P, Swedberg R (eds) (1998) Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Keohane RO (1984) After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Pogge TW (2008) World poverty and human rights, 2nd edn. Polity Press, MaldenGoogle Scholar
- World Bank (2011) World development indicators. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar