Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 35–54

When Is It Right to Fight? Just War Theory and the Individual-Centric Approach

Article

Abstract

Recent work in the ethics of war has done much to challenge the collectivism of the convention-based, Walzerian just war theory. In doing so, it raises the question of when it is permissible for soldiers to resort to force. This article considers this issue and, in doing so, argues that the rejection of collectivism in just war should go further still. More specifically, it defends the ‘Individual-Centric Approach’ to the deep morality of war, which asserts that the justifiability of an individual’s contribution to the war, rather than the justifiability of the war more generally, determines the moral acceptability of their participation. It then goes on to present five implications of the Individual-Centric Approach, including for individual liability to attack in war.

Keywords

Individual-centric approach Jeff McMahan Jus ad bellum Just war theory Private contractors 

References

  1. Coady CAJ (1980) The leaders and the led: problems of just war theory. Inq 23(3):275–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Estlund D (2007) On following orders in an unjust war. J Polit Philos 15(2):213–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fabre C (2008) Cosmopolitanism, just war theory, and legitimate authority. Int Aff 84(5):963–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fabre C (2009) Guns, food, and liability to attack in war. Ethics 120(4):36–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hurka T (2005) Proportionality in the morality of war. Philos Publ Aff 33(1):34–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaldor K (1999) New and old wars: organized violence in a global era. Polity Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Lazar S (2009) Responsibility, risk, and killing in self-defense. Ethics 119(4):699–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lazar S (2010) The responsibility dilemma for killing in war: a review essay. Philos Publ Aff 38(2):180–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mapel D (1998) Coerced moral agents? individual responsibility for military service. J Polit Philos 6(2):171–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. May L (2011) Contingent pacifism and the moral risks of participation in war. Publ Aff Q 25(2):95–111Google Scholar
  11. McMahan J (2004) The ethics of killing in war. Ethics 114(4):693–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McMahan J (2007) The sources and status of just war principles. J Mil Ethics 6(2):91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McMahan J (2008a) Comment. In: Doyle M, Striking first: preemption and prevention in international conflict. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 125–47Google Scholar
  14. McMahan J (2008b) Justification and liability in war. J Polit Philos 16(2):227–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McMahan J (2008c) The morality of war and the law of war. In: Rodin D, Shue H (eds) Just and unjust warriors. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 19–43Google Scholar
  16. McMahan J (2009) Killing in war. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMahan J (2010) Pacifism and moral theory. Diametros 23:3–20Google Scholar
  18. McMahan J (2011) Who is morally liable to be killed in war. Analysis 71(3):544–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moellendorf D (2008) Jus ex bello. J Polit Philos 16(2):123–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman N (2004) The ‘new wars’ debate: a historical perspective is needed. Secur Dialog 35(2):173–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pattison J (2008) Just war theory and the privatization of military force. Ethics Int Aff 22(2):143–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pattison J (2010a) Deeper objections to the privatisation of military force. J Polit Philos 18(4):425–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pattison J (2010b) Humanitarian intervention and the responsibility to protect: who should intervene? Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pattison J (2010c) Outsourcing the responsibility to protect: humanitarian intervention and private military and security companies. Int Theory 2(1):1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pattison J (forthcoming) The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory. Eur J Polit TheoryGoogle Scholar
  26. Pattison J (under contract) The morality of private war. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Quinn W (1989) Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of doing and allowing. Philos Rev 98(3):287–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rodin D, Shue H (eds) (2008) Just and unjust warriors: the legal and moral status of soldiers. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Scheffler S (2004) Doing and allowing. Ethics 114(2):215–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz M, Swain J (2011) The department of defense contractors in Afghanistan and Iraq: background and analysis. Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress, R40764, May 13, 2011Google Scholar
  31. Smiley, M (2011) Collective responsibility. In: Zalta E (ed) The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy Spring 2011 Edn. Web. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/collective-responsibility/. Accessed 8 September 2011
  32. Toner C (2010) The logical structure of just war theory. J Ethics 14(2):81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viner S (2010) Self-defense, punishing unjust combatants and justice in war. Crim Law Philos 4(3):297–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walzer M (2006) Just and unjust wars, 4th edn. BasicBooks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Zohar N (1993) Collective war and individualistic ethics: against the conscription of ‘self-defense’. Polit Theory 21(4):606–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Politics, School of Social SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations