Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 521–540 | Cite as

Rational Choice and Moral Theory

Article

Abstract

Contemporary discussions of the positive relation between rational choice and moral theory are a special case of a much older tradition that seeks to show that mutual agreement upon certain moral rules works to the mutual advantage, or in the interests, of those who so agree. I make a few remarks about the history of discussions of the connection between morality and self-interest, after which I argue that the modern theory of rational choice can be naturally understood as a continuation of this older tradition. I then go on to argue for a controversial three-fold thesis: (1) that grounding a theory of morality in terms of rational self-interest is the only epistemologically respectable way to proceed with the justification of moral principles; (2) that despite this, most of the contemporary explorations of rational choice foundations for moral principles do not work—that the models of rational choice to which they appeal yield less than the substantial results that they are intended to yield; but (3) that if one rethinks just what it means to be rational, one can find in fact a promising way to connect the two—specifically through the development of a theory of genuinely cooperative activity.

Keywords

Bargaining Game theory Gauthier Harsanyi Moral theory Morgenstern Nash Rational choice Rawls Von Neumann 

References

  1. Aquinas, St. Thomas (1271-72 [1945]) Summa Theologica [A Treatise on Theology], Part I-II [Selections]. In idem: Pegis AC (ed) Basic writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, vol. II. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K (1977) Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice. Am Econ Rev 67:219–225Google Scholar
  3. Ayer AJ (1936 [1952]) Language, truth and logic. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baier K (1963) The moral point of view: a rational basis of ethics. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry B (1973) Liberal theory of justice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentham J (1789 [1988]) [Introduction to the] principles of morals and legislation. Prometheus Books, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan J, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  8. Dworkin R (1981) What is equality? Part 2: equality of resources. Philos Public Aff 10:283–345Google Scholar
  9. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game theory. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gauthier D (1986) Morals by agreement. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Hampshire S (1949) Fallacies in moral philosophy. Mind 58:466–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare RM (1996) Foundationalism and coherentism in ethics. In: Sinnott-Armstrong W, Timmons M (eds) Moral knowledge? New readings in moral epistemology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Harsanyi JC (1955) Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harsanyi JC (1956) Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: a critical discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’s, and Nash’s Theories. Econometrica 24:144–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harsanyi JC (1963) A simplified bargaining model for the n-person cooperative game. Int Econ Rev 4(2):194–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harsanyi JC (1977) Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. Cambridge U.P, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobbes T (1651 [1994]) Leviathan. With selected variants from the latin edition of 1668. In: Curley E (ed) Hackett Publishing Co, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  19. Hume D (1739-40 [1960]) A treatise of human nature. Selby-Bigge Edition. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43:513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaysen K (1946-7) A revolution in economic theory. Rev Econ Stud 14(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreps DM (1990) Game theory and economic modeling. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Locke J (1689-91 [1975]) Essay concerning human understanding. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Luce RD, Raiffa H (1957) Games and decisions. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Margolis H (1984) Selfishness, altruism and rationality. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Mill JS (1861 [1998]) Utilitarianism. In: Roger Crisp (ed) Oxford U. P., Oxford; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nash J (1951) Non-cooperative games. Ann Math 54:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nash J (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prichard HA (1912) Does moral philosophy rest on a mistake? Mind N S 21:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rawls J (1950) Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. Philos Rev 60:177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rawls J (1958) Justice as fairness. Philos Rev 67:164–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rawls J (1971 [1999]) A theory of justice. Revised Edition. Belknap, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Roth AE (1977) Individual rationality and Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem. Math Oper Res 2:64–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sen AK (1977) Social choice theory: a re-examination. Econometrica 45:53–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sen AK (1973 [1997]) On economic inequality. Enl. ed., with a substantial annexe "On economic inequality after a quarter century" by James Foster and Amartya Kumar Sen. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevenson CL (1944) Ethics and language. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  38. Strawson PF (1961) Social morality and individual ideal. Philosophy 36:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeuthen FLB (1930) Problems of monopoly and economic warfare. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations