An Adamsian Theory of Intrinsic Value
- 110 Downloads
In this paper I develop a theological account of intrinsic value drawn from some passages in Robert Merrihew Adams’ book Finite and Infinite Goods. First I explain why Adams’ work on this topic is interesting, situate his theory within the broader literature on intrinsic value, and draw attention to some of its revisionist features. Next I state the theory, raise some problems for it, and refine it in light of those problems. Then I illustrate how the refined theory works by showing that it has the resources to deal with some seemingly formidable objections.
KeywordsAdams, R.M. Instrinsic value God
Thanks to Lynne Baker, Andrew Dole, Pete Graham, Gary Mathews, James Patten, Alex Sarch, the members of Lynne and Gary’s Fall 2008 Philosophy of Religion Seminar, and the two reviewers for Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Special thanks to Lowell Friesen for many insightful discussions of this topic over coffee. Most of all I thank Fred Feldman for extensive commentary and discussion of countless drafts of this paper.
- Adams RM (1999) Finite and infinite goods: a framework for ethics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Adams RM (2006) A theory of virtue: excellence in being for the good. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Feldman F (1983) Doing the best we can: an essay in informal deontic logic, Reidel, March, 1986, XIV + 244Google Scholar
- Feldman F (2004) Pleasure and the good life: concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of Hedonism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Johnston M (2009) Saving God: religion after idolatry. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Kagan S (2009a) The grasshopper, Aristotle, Bob Adams, and me. In: Newlands S, Jorgensen LM (eds) Metaphysics and the good: themes from the philosophy of Robert Merrihew Adams. New York, pp 388–404Google Scholar
- Lewis D (1986) Philosophical papers: volume II. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Parsons J (manuscript) Intrinsic value and intrinsic properties. http://pukeko.otago.ac.nz/∼jp30/papers/, 1–9
- Rosen G (2010) Metaphysical dependence: grounding and reduction. In: Hale B, Hoffman A (eds) Modality: metaphysics, logic, and epistemology. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Schaffer J (2009) On what grounds what. In: Chalmers D, Manley D, Wasserman R (eds) Metametaphysics: new essays on the foundations of ontology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 347–383Google Scholar