Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 235–245 | Cite as

Unsavory Seduction

Article

Abstract

Among human beings, sexual pursuit takes many forms. Some forms, like courtship, are morally innocuous. Other forms, like rape, are categorically immoral. Still other forms are provisionally immoral. Such forms of sexual pursuit involve a wrongful element sufficient to render them wrongful on balance provided that this wrongful element is not counterbalanced by even more important competing moral considerations. Here my focus is a particular form of provisionally immoral sexual pursuit, unsavory sexual seduction, or unsavory seduction for short.

Keywords

Seduction Courtship Sexual ethics Autonomy Philosophy of sex 

References

  1. Buss D (2003) The evolution of sexual desire. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Cave E (2007) What’s wrong with motive manipulation? Ethical Theory Moral Pract 10:129–144. doi:10.1007/s10677-006-9052-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christman J (1991) Autonomy and personal history. Can J Philos 21:1–24Google Scholar
  4. Feinberg J (1984) Harm to others. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher H (1992) The anatomy of love. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher JM, Ravizza M (1988) Responsibility and control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Gauthier D (1986) Morals by agreement. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Givens D (1983) Love signals: How to attract a mate. Crown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Goethe JW (1994) Faust I and II. In: Atkins S (ed and trans) Goethe: the collected works, vol. 2. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hardy T (2003) Tess of the D’Urbervilles. In: Dolin T (ed). Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Kant I (1964) Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. In: Paton HJ (trans). Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kierkegaard S (1959) Either/or, vol. 1. In: Swenson D and Swenson L (trans). Doubleday & Company, Garden City, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Korsgaard C (1996) Creating the kingdom of ends. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Laclos C (1962) Les liaisons dangereuses. In: Aldington, R (trans). Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Mele A (2001) Autonomous agents: From self-control to autonomy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Mill JS (1978) On liberty. In: Rapaport E (ed). Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller G (2000) The mating mind. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Neill O (1985) Between consenting adults. Philos Public Aff 14:252–277Google Scholar
  19. Perper T (1985) Sex signals: The biology of love. ISI, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Shakespeare W (1998) Richard III. In: Barnet S (ed). Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English and PhilosophyArkansas State UniversityArkansasUSA

Personalised recommendations