Why robots should not be treated like animals
- 1k Downloads
Responsible Robotics is about developing robots in ways that take their social implications into account, which includes conceptually framing robots and their role in the world accurately. We are now in the process of incorporating robots into our world and we are trying to figure out what to make of them and where to put them in our conceptual, physical, economic, legal, emotional and moral world. How humans think about robots, especially humanoid social robots, which elicit complex and sometimes disconcerting reactions, is not predetermined. The animal–robot analogy is one of the most commonly used in attempting to frame interactions between humans and robots and it also tends to push in the direction of blurring the distinction between humans and machines. We argue that, despite some shared characteristics, when it comes to thinking about the moral status of humanoid robots, legal liability, and the impact of treatment of humanoid robots on how humans treat one another, analogies with animals are misleading.
KeywordsEthics Robots Humanoids Animals Robot law
- Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (Eds.). (2011). Machine ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Asaro, P. M. (2012). A body to kick, but still no soul to damn: Legal perspectives on robotics. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Asaro, P. M. (2016). The liability problem for autonomous artificial agents. Ethical and Moral Considerations in Non-Human Agents, 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.Google Scholar
- Asimov, I. (1993). Forward the foundation. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Calverley, D. J. (2005). Android science and the animal rights movement: Are there analogies. In Cognitive Sciences Society Workshop, Stresa, Italy, pp. 127–136.Google Scholar
- Darling, K. (2016). Extending legal protection to social robots: The effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior towards robotic objects. In R. Calo, A. M. Froomkin & I. Kerr (Eds.), Robot Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Delvaux, M. (2016). Draft Report with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs Report 2015/2103 (INL).Google Scholar
- Dick, P. K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep? London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- EPSRC. (2010). Principles of robotics, engineering and physical sciences research council. Retrieved April 2018 from https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/.
- Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., De Ruiter, L., & Hegel, F. (2012). “If you sound like me, you must be more human”: On the interplay of robot and user features on human–robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI’12), pp. 125–126.Google Scholar
- Ford, M. (2015). The rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of mass unemployment. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
- Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S., Setlock, L. D., & Yew, V. (2008). How people anthropomorphize robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI 2008), pp. 145–152.Google Scholar
- Future of Life Institute. (2015). Autonomous weapons: An open letter from Ai & robotics researchers. Retrieved August 2017 from https://www.futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/.
- Garland, A. (2015). Ex Machina [Motion Picture]. Universal City: Universal Pictures.Google Scholar
- Gibson, W. (1996). Idoru. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
- Glas, D. F., Minato, T., Ishi, C. T., Kawahara, T., & Ishiguro, H. (2016). “ERICA: The ERATO Intelligent Conversational Android.” Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 22–29.Google Scholar
- Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The machine question. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hanson Robotics. (2017). Sophia. Retrieved April 2008 from http://www.hansonrobotics.com/robot/sophia.
- Jonze, S. Her [Motion Picture], Warner Bros., Burbank, 2013.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics, In: P. Heath and J. B. Schneewind (Eds.), translated by P Heath.Google Scholar
- Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Levine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., & Quillen, D. (2016). Learning hand-eye coordination for robotic grasping with deep learning and large-scale data collection. Google Preliminary Report. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02199v4.pdf.
- Levy, D. (2008). Love and Sex with Robots. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
- Liang, A., Piroth, I., Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Fisher, M., Nater, U. M., Skoluda, N., & Broadbend, E. (2017). A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. Retrieved August 2017 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2011). Robot Ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- MacLennan, B. (2013). Cruelty to robots? The hard problem of robot suffering. Proceedings of the 2013 Meeting of the International Association for Computing and Philosophy (IACAP).Google Scholar
- Metzinger, T. (2013). Two principles for robot ethics. In E. Hilgendorf & J.-P. Günther (Eds.), Robotik und Gesetzgebung (pp. 247–286). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
- Minsky, M. (2013). Dr. Marvin Minsky—Facing the future. Retrieved June 2017 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9sujY8Xjro.
- Moore, A. (1989). V for Vendetta. Burbank: DC Comics.Google Scholar
- Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.Google Scholar
- Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E., & Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perkowitz, S. (2004). Digital people: From bionic humans to androids. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
- Ramey, C. H. (2005). “For the Sake of Others”: The “Personal” Ethics of Human-Android Interaction. In Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science: A CogSci 2005 Workshop. July 25–26, Stresa, Italy, pp. 137–148.Google Scholar
- Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 5, 456–468.Google Scholar
- Schaerer, E., Kelley, R., & Nicolescu, M. (2009). Robots as animals: A framework for liability and responsibility in human-robot interactions. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 72–77, IEEE.Google Scholar
- Sharkey, N., van Wynsberghe, A., Robbins, S., & Hancock, E. (2017). Our sexual future with robots. The Hague: Foundation for Responsible Robotics. Retrieved September 2017 from http://responsiblerobotics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FRR-Consultation-Report-Our-Sexual-Future-with-robots_Final.pdf.
- Sullins, J. P. (2006). When is a robot a moral agent. International Review of Information Ethics, 6(12), 23–30.Google Scholar
- Sullins, J. P. (2011). When is a robot a moral agent? In M. Anderson & S. L. Anderson (Eds.), Machine ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar