Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 119–134 | Cite as

A confluence of new technology and the right to water: experience and potential from South Africa’s constitution and commons

  • Nathan Cooper
  • Andrew Swan
  • David Townend
Original Paper


South Africa’s groundbreaking constitution explicitly confers a right of access to sufficient water (section 27). But the country is officially ‘water-stressed’ and around 10 % of the population still has no access to on-site or off-site piped or tap water. It is evident that a disconnect exists between this right and the reality for many; however the reasons for the continuation of such discrepancies are not always clear. While barriers to sufficient water are myriad, one significant factor contributing to insufficient and unpredictable access to water is the high percentage of broken water pumps. Previous studies have reported that between 20 and 50 % of all hand operated water pumps installed on the African continent are broken, or out of use. Monitoring and maintenance of pumps, which in South Africa is the responsibility of local municipalities is often ineffective, in part due to the distances between municipal centres and rural communities and the consequent costs of site visits, as well as breakdowns within the local bureaucratic system. The emergence of new telemetry tools that can remotely monitor water applications constitutes a novel and cost-efficient alternative to undertaking regular sites visits. Sustainable, appropriate, low-cost telemetry systems are emerging that could be used to monitor the operational performance of water pumps, or a wide range of other field parameters, and to communicate this information swiftly and cheaply to water service providers, using SMS messages. Data on the performance of water pumps could also be made available to the public online. This is an example of how ICT can be used for water resources management and environmental regulation, as well as in the governance of socio-economic rights: helping to optimize water allocation by improving communication and strengthening accountability.


Commons Human rights IWRM Property Telemetry 


  1. Bakker, K. (2007). ‘The ‘commons’ versus the ‘commodity’: Alter-globalization, anti-privatisation and the human right to water in the global south. Antipode, 39(3), 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyleveld, D., & Brownsword, R. (2001). Human dignity in bioethics and biolaw (pp. 171–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, P. (2009). South Africa’s rights culture of water consumption: Breaking out of the liberal box and into the commons? (Vol. 12) Draft paper, presented at Syracuse conference, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, P., & Dugard, J. (2008). Water, human rights and social conflict: South African experiences. Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1, Electronic Law Journals, Updated January 29 2009. (Accessed January 2014).
  5. Chaudhri, R., Borriello, G., & Thies, W. (2010). FoneAstra: Making mobile phones smarter. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on networked systems for developing regions (pp. 1–5), June 15–15, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Charity Water. (2012). A brand new technology supported by Google. Charity Water. Log website, Updated December 4, 2012. (Accessed January 2013).
  7. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V., & Bishop, R. C. (1975). Common property as a concept in natural resources policy. Natural Resources Journal, 15, 713.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, N. J., & French, D. (2012). The right to water in South Africa: Constitutional managerialism and a call for pluralism. In E. Blanco & J. Razzaque (Eds.), Natural resources and the green economy: Redefining the challenges for people, states and corporations (pp. 111–138). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Curran I., & Pluta, S. (2008). Overview of machine and telematics water event. 6th Institution of Engineering and Technology, Coventry, 22–23 April, ISBN: 978-0-86341-911-9.Google Scholar
  10. DWAAF. (1997). Department of Water Affairs and Forestry White Paper on a National Water Policy for South Africa.Google Scholar
  11. Dublin Principles. (1992). The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. In International conference on water and the environment. (Accessed 2013).
  12. Engel, S., Iskandarani, M., & Useche, M. (2003). Improved water supply in the Ghanaian Volta Basin: Who uses it and who participates in community decision making. Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE), Durban, South Africa.Google Scholar
  13. FBW. (2001). Free basic water programme 2001. (Accessed July 2013).
  14. Gallop. (2011). Mobile phone access varies widely in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gallop website. Updated January 27, 2012. (Accessed January 2012).
  15. Gerwirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. GHS. (2010). General household survey, South African Government website (Accessed July 2013).
  17. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162. Google Scholar
  18. Harvey, D. (2011). The future of the commons. Radical History Review, 109, 104.Google Scholar
  19. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. IEEE Computer, 41(6), 26–33. doi: 10.1109/MC.2008.192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ICESCR. (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, adopted 16 Dec 1966, 993 U.N.T.S. 3 (entered into force 3 Jan. 1976), G.A. Res. 2200 (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316.Google Scholar
  21. Kidd, M. (2008). Environmental law. Juta Law Publishing, South Africa.Google Scholar
  22. Kotze, L. (2009). Access to water in South Africa: Constitutional perspectives from a developing country. Ymparistojuridiikka, 70–106, 78.Google Scholar
  23. Macpherson, C. B. (1975). Capitalism and the changing concept of property. In E. Kamenka & R. S. Neale (Eds.), Feudalism, capitalism and beyond (pp. 104–124). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  24. Manqele V Durban Transitional Metropolitan Council 2002 (6) SA 423 (D&CLD). (2002).Google Scholar
  25. Mazibuko and others v City of Johannesburg and others (2008). Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions as amicus curiae [2008] JOL 21829 (W).Google Scholar
  26. Mazibuko and others v City of Johannesburg and others. (2009). JOL 24351 (CC).Google Scholar
  27. Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. P. (2004). The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media & Society. (Accessed January 2014).
  28. Mitchell, B. (2005). Integrated water resources management, institutional arrangements, and land use planning. Environment and Planning, 37, 1335–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moriarty, P., Butterworth, J., & van Koppen, B. (2004). Beyond domestic: Case studies on poverty and productive uses of water at the household level. Technical Paper Series; No. 41. Delft, The Netherlands: IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre. ISBN 90-6687-044-3.Google Scholar
  30. NWA. (1998). National Water Act, 36 of 1998. Available at: (Accessed July 2013).
  31. On the Commons. (2012). (Accessed July 2013).
  32. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action (p. 182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pieterse, M. (2007). Eating socio-economic rights: The usefulness of rights talk in alleviating social hardship revisited. Human Right Quarterly, 29, 796–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. RDP. (1994). White paper on reconstruction and development, Parliament of the Republic of South Africa, Cape Town, 15 Nov 1994. (Accessed 2013).
  36. Reich, C. A. (1964). The new property. The Yale Law Journal, 73(5), 733–787.Google Scholar
  37. Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South AfricaAs subsequently amended. (Accessed February 2012).
  38. Republic of South Africa. (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996, Government Gazette 378Google Scholar
  39. Residents of Bon Vista Mansions v Southern Metropolitan Local Council. (2002). JOL 9513 (W).Google Scholar
  40. Russell, A. (2009). Bring me my machine gun: The battle for the Soul of South Africa, from Mandela to Zuma. USA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  41. RWSN. (2004). The handpump. Network for cost-effective technologies in water supply and sanitation. St. Gallen, Switzerland: SKAT.Google Scholar
  42. Scanlon, J., Cassar, A., & Nemes, N. (2004). Water as a human right? (p. 28) IUCN Environmental Policy and Law Paper No 51, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Swan A. D. (2011). Low cost telemetry for water applications in rural Africa: A review. In Proceedings of the 12th international WATERNET/WARFSA/GWP-SA symposium, Maputo, Mozambique, 26–28 October 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Swan, A. D., & Cooper, N. J. (2013). Innovative funding methods for rural communities and their water pumps. Journal of Water Resources and Rural Development, 1, 17–26.Google Scholar
  45. Swan, A. D., Cooper, N. J., & Aktins, M. (2012). The development of sustainable appropriate low cost telemetry for monitoring community water schemes. In Proceedings of 13th WATERNET/WARFSA/GWP-SA Symposium, Johannesburg, South Africa, October 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Thomson, P., Hope, R., & Foster, T. (2012). GSM-enabled remote monitoring of rural handpumps. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 14(4), 829–839.Google Scholar
  47. UDHR. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted 10 Dec. 1948, G.A. Res. 217A (III), 3 U.N. GAOR (Resolutions, part 1) at 71, U.N. Doc. A/810.Google Scholar
  48. UNCESCR. (2003). General Comment 15, The right to water (29th session, 2003), United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2002/11 (2002), reprinted in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 at 105 (2003). Paragraph 2. (Accessed 2012).
  49. UNCTAD. (2009). Information economy reportTrends and outlook in turbulent times. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Publications, UNCTAD/IER/2009.Google Scholar
  50. van Rensberg, L. J. (2008). The right of access to adequate water: Discussion of Mazibuko v The City of Johannesburg [Case No 13865/06]. Stellenbosch Law Review, 3, 434.Google Scholar
  51. WFP. (2010). FLOW field level operations watch, water for people. (Accessed January 2013).
  52. Whittington, D., Davis, J., Prokopy, L., Komives, K., Thorsten, R., Lukacs, H., et al. (2008). How well is the demand-driven, community management model for rural water supply systems doing? Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper No. 22.Google Scholar
  53. WSA. (1997). Water Services Act, Water Services Regulations, Regulation 3 (b) in GN R 509, Government Gazette of 8 June 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and LawUniversity of LincolnLincoln, LincolnshireUK
  2. 2.Civil Engineering, School of the Built EnvironmentLeeds Metropolitan UniversityLeedsUK
  3. 3.Department of Health, Ethics and Society, CAPHRI Research School of Public Health and Primary CareMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations