Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Getting ‘virtual’ wrongs right

  • Robert Francis John SeddonEmail author
Original Paper


Whilst some philosophical progress has been made on the ethical evaluation of playing video games, the exact subject matter of this enquiry remains surprisingly opaque. ‘Virtual murder’, simulation, representation and more are found in a literature yet to settle into a tested and cohesive terminology. Querying the language of the virtual in particular, I suggest that it is at once inexplicit and laden with presuppositions potentially liable to hinder anyone aiming to construct general philosophical claims about an ethics of gameplay, for whom assumptions about the existence of ‘virtual’ counterparts to morally salient phenomena may prove untrustworthy. Ambiguously straddling the pictorial and the performative aspects of video gaming, the virtual leaves obscure the ways in which we become involved in gameplay, and particularly the natures of our intentions and attitudes whilst grappling with a game; furthermore, it remains unclear how we are to generalise across encounters with the virtual. I conclude by briefly noting one potential avenue of further enquiry into our modes of participation in games: into the differences which a moral examination of playfulness might make to ethical evaluation.


Computer games Virtual Virtual murder Fiction Interactivity Playfulness 



I should like to thank the journal’s two anonymous referees for their help in identifying potential risks of confusion for readers in the presentation of an admittedly tricky argument. Also Andy Hamilton for telling me about the Williams Committee back in my undergraduate days.


  1. Abell, C. (2009). Canny resemblance. Philosophical Review, 118, 183–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, M. & Petley, J. (2001). Introduction: From bad research to good—a guide for the perplexed. In M. Barker & J. Petley (Eds.), Ill effects: The media/violence debate (pp. 1–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bartel, C. (2012). Resolving the gamer’s dilemma. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brey, P. (1999). The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology, 1, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brey, P. (2005). The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction. Minds and Machines, 15, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castronova, E. (2005). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gooskens, G. (2011). Beyond good and evil? Morality in video games. Philosophical Writings, 1, 37–44.Google Scholar
  8. Gooskens, G. (2012). Varieties of pictorial experience. Dissertation: University of Antwerp. Accessed 12th May, 2012.
  9. King, B. (2002). Make love, not war games. Accessed 14th June, 2012.
  10. King, B., & Borland, J. (2003). Dungeons and dreamers: The rise of computer game culture from geek to chic. Emeryville: McGraw-Hill/Osborne.Google Scholar
  11. Koppelman, J. (2005). Does obscenity cause moral harm? Columbia Law Review, 105, 1634–1680.Google Scholar
  12. Levy, N. (2002). Virtual child pornography: The eroticization of inequality. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, A. (2011). Ageplay: An adults only game. Counselling Australia, 11(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  14. Luck, M. (2009). The gamer’s dilemma: An analysis of the arguments for the moral distinction between virtual murder and virtual paedophilia. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), 31–36.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCormick, M. (2001). Is it wrong to play violent video games? Ethics and Information Technology, 3, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meek, C. (2008). Just age playing around? How second life aids and abets child pornography. North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, 9, 88–111.Google Scholar
  17. Midgley, M. (1996). Can education be moral? Res Publica, 2(1), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Patridge, S. (2011). The incorrigible social meaning of video game imagery. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Phillips, B. (2009). Staying power: Rethinking feedback to keep players in the game. Accessed 24th April, 2012.
  20. Rossignol, J. (2008). This gaming life: Travels in three cities. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sartre, J.-P. (2010). The imaginary. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, S. (2009). The paradox of fiction. In J. Fieser & B. Dowden (Eds.), Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed 9th May, 2012.
  23. Schulzke, M. (2010). Defending the morality of violent video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sicart, M. (2009). The banality of simulated evil: Designing ethical gameplay. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Singer, P. (2007). Video game violence vs. virtual pedophilia. The Japan Times Online. Accessed 11th May, 2012.
  26. Smuts, A. (2009). What is interactivity? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 43(4), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stolnitz, J. (1992). On the cognitive triviality of art. British Journal of Aesthetics, 32(3), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weiss, M. D. (2006). Working at play: BDSM sexuality in the San Francisco Bay Area. Anthropologica, 48, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams, B., et al. (1979). Report of the committee on obscenity and film censorship. United Kingdom: H.M.S.O., Cmnd 7772.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, R. F. (2009). Sex play in virtual worlds. Washington and Lee Law Review, 66(3), 1127–1174.Google Scholar
  31. Wolfendale, J. (2007). My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wonderly, M. (2008). A Humean approach to assessing the moral significance of ultra-violent video games. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zimmerman, E. (2012). Jerked around by the magic circle: Clearing the air ten years later. Retrieved 16th June, 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations