Framing robot arms control
- First Online:
- 774 Downloads
The development of autonomous, robotic weaponry is progressing rapidly. Many observers agree that banning the initiation of lethal activity by autonomous weapons is a worthy goal. Some disagree with this goal, on the grounds that robots may equal and exceed the ethical conduct of human soldiers on the battlefield. Those who seek arms-control agreements limiting the use of military robots face practical difficulties. One such difficulty concerns defining the notion of an autonomous action by a robot. Another challenge concerns how to verify and monitor the capabilities of rapidly changing technologies. In this article we describe concepts from our previous work about autonomy and ethics for robots and apply them to military robots and robot arms control. We conclude with a proposal for a first step toward limiting the deployment of autonomous weapons capable of initiating lethal force.
KeywordsMilitary robots Moral machines Machine ethics Operational morality Robot arms control Autonomous weapons
- Altmann, J. (2009). Preventive arms control for uninhabited military vehicles. In R. Capurro & M. Nagenborg (Eds.), Ethics for robotics. AKA Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Arkin, R. (2012). Presentations at the EPIIC international symposium on conflict in the 21st century. Tufts University, February 22, 23.Google Scholar
- Asaro, P. (2008). How just could a robot war be? In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy (pp. 50–64). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Dahm, W. J. A. (2012). Killer robots are science fiction. The Wall Street Journal, February 16th 2011. Available online at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204883304577221590015475180.html. Accessed 13 Oct 2012
- Dancy, J. (2011). Contribution to discussion on “The Future of Moral Machines”, On the human. National Humanities Center. http://onthehuman.org/2011/12/the-future-of-moral-machines/. Accessed 1 May 2012.
- Dennett, D. C. (1978). Brainstorms. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Finn, P. (2011). A future for drones: Automated killing. The Washington post, September 19, 2011. Available online at http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/national-security/a-future-for-drones-automated-killing/2011/09/15/gIQAVy9mgK_story.html. Accessed 19 December 2011.
- Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gips, J. (1991). Towards the ethical robot. In K. G. Ford, C. Glymour, & P. J. Hayes (Eds.), Android epistemology (pp. 243–252). Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Gormley, D. M. (2008). Missile contagion: Cruise missile proliferation and the threat to international security. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Resiliance engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Kim, T.-G. (2010). Machine gun-armed robots to guard DMZ. The Korea Times, June 24, 2010. Available online at http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/biz/2010/06/123_68227.html. Accessed 19 December 2011.
- Krishnan, A. (2009). Killer robots: Legality and ethicality of autonomous weapons. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Lin, P. (2011). Drone-ethics briefing: What a leading robot expert told the CIA, The Altantic. December 15, 2011. Available online at http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/12/drone-ethics-briefing-what-a-leading-robot-expert-told-the-cia/250060/. Accessed 19 December 2011.
- Lokhorst, G., & van den Hoven, J. (2012). Responsibility for military robots. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P. J. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In D. Michie, & B. Meltzer (Eds.), Machine Intelligence 4 (pp. 463–502). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Sharkey, N. (2012). Killing made easy: From joysticks to politics. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. W. (2009). Wired for war. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, R. (2011). Robotic weapons and the future of war. In J. Wolfendale, & P. Tripodi (Eds.), New wars and new soldiers: Military ethics in the contemporary world (pp. 117–133). Surrey, UK & Burlington, VA: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B. C. (2002). Can a computer adhere to the categorical imperative? A contemplation of the limits of transcendental ethics in IT. Paper presented at the international conference on systems research, informatics and cybernetics, Baden Baden, GE.Google Scholar
- Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- U.S. Army Science Board. (2002). Ad Hoc study on human robot interface issues. Available online at http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA411834. Accessed 19 April 2012.
- U.S. Army Medical Department. (2008). MHAT-IV. http://www.armymedicine.army.mil/reports/mhat/mhat_iv/mhat-iv.cfm. Accessed 20 December 2011.
- U.S. Air Force. (2009). Unmanned Aircraft Systems Flight Plan 2009–2047. Available at http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/072309kp1.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2012.
- U.S. Department of Defense (2009). Fiscal Year 2009–2034 Unmanned systems integrated roadmap. http://www.acq.osd.mil/psa/docs/UMSIntegratedRoadmap2009.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2011.
- U.S. Department of Defense. (2012). Task force report: The role of autonomy in DoD systems. http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsb/autonomy.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2012.
- Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Woods, D. D., & Hollnagel, E. (2006). Joint cognitive systems: Patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar