An ethical framework in information systems decision making using normative theories of business ethics
- 1.9k Downloads
As business environments become more complex and reliant on information systems, the decisions made by managers affect a growing number of stakeholders. This paper proposes a framework based on the application of normative theories in business ethics to facilitate the evaluation of IS related ethical dilemmas and arrive at fair and consistent decisions. The framework is applied in the context of an information privacy dilemma to demonstrate the decision making process. The ethical dilemma is analyzed using each one of the three normative theories—the stockholder theory, stakeholder theory, and social contract theory. The challenges associated with the application of these theories are also discussed.
KeywordsEthical decision making Normative theories of business ethics Information systems Information privacy
I thank Dr. Deepak Datta at the University of Texas at Arlington, USA for his assistance with editing the manuscript. I also extend my thanks to the reviewers, and specially reviewer #3 for the detailed comments that greatly helped in improving the clarity of the article.
- Bishop, J.D. (2000). A framework for discussing normative theories of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 563–591.Google Scholar
- Bowie, N. F., & Freeman, R. E. (1992). Ethics and agency theory: An introduction. In N. E. Bowie & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Ethics and agency theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Burk, D. L. (2005). Legal and technical standards in digital rights management technology. Fordham Law Review, 74(2), 537–574.Google Scholar
- Council of Europe. (2010). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amended as on June 1 2010. Available at: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/005.htm.
- Donaldson, T. J. (1982). Corporations and morality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T. S. (1989). The ethics of international business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 252–284.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). The social contract for business. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. K. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 65–91.Google Scholar
- European Parliament and Council. (1995). Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data on the free movement of such data. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/95-46-ce/dir1995-46_part1_en.pdf.
- European Union. (2000). Charter of fundamental rights of the European union, 7 December 2000. Official Journal of the European Communities, 18 December 2000 (2000/C 364/01). Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3b70.html.
- Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (3rd ed., pp. 97–106). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Ball.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, 173–178.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (trans: Beck, L. W.). New York: Liberal Arts Press.Google Scholar
- Kultgen, J. (1985). Donaldson’s social contract for business. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 5, 28–39.Google Scholar
- Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2009). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Mason, R. O., Mason, F. M., & Culnan, M. J. (1995). Ethics of information management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Matchett, N. J. (2008). Ethics across the Curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education, 142, 14.Google Scholar
- Mill, J. S. (1965). In J. B. Schneewind (Ed.), Mill’s ethical writings. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
- Quinn, D. P., & Jones, T. M. (1995). An agent morality view of’ business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 22–42.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, G. (2009). Ethics in information technology. Stamford, USA: Course Technology.Google Scholar
- Smith, H. J. (1994). Managing privacy: Information technology and corporate America. Chapel Hill, USA: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- van den Hoven, J., & Weckert, J. (2008). Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Velasquez, M. G. (2006). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Verbeek, P. P. (2009). The moral relevance of technological artifacts. In P. Sollie & M. Duwell (Eds.), Evaluating new technologies: Methodological problems for the ethical assessment of technology developments (pp. 63–79). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Wright, D. (2010). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology. doi: 10.1007/s10676-010-9242-6.