Advertisement

Richard Spinello and Maria Bottis: Understanding the debate on the legal protection of moral intellectual property interests: review essay of A Defense of Intellectual Property Rights

Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, ISBN 978 1 84720 395 3
  • Kenneth Einar HimmaEmail author
Book Review
  • 296 Downloads

The thesis of A Defense of Intellectual Property Rights, as the title makes clear, is that some legal protection of intellectual property rights is morally legitimate. At the very start of the book in Chap. 1, however, Spinello and Bottis are careful to describe their thesis in a way that clearly indicates their dissatisfaction with many existing laws protecting intellectual property. Their thesis should not be read as an endorsement of all existing legal protections: they set out their position clearly—a sensible move given that much of the intellectual property literature generates more heated sloganeering than light.1

This is such a crucial point to remember in reading this outstanding volume—and it is an outstanding contribution to the literature whether one agrees or not with their conclusions and analysis—that I think it helpful to let Spinello and Bottis speak for themselves; they make the point much more perspicuously than I could. After a brief survey of a number of laws they...

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image-misic-text. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Foucault, M. (1977). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard & S. Simon (Eds.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Himma, K. E. (2005). Information and intellectual property protection: Evaluating the claim that information should be free. APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law, 4(2).Google Scholar
  4. Himma, K. E. (2007). Justifying intellectual property protection: Why the interests of content-creators usually wins over everyone else’s. In E. Rooksby & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and social justice. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.Google Scholar
  5. Himma, K. E. (2008) The justification of intellectual property rights: contemporary philosophical disputes (perspectives on global information ethics). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1143–1161.Google Scholar
  6. Kimppa, K. (2005). Intellectual property rights in software: Justifiable from a liberalist position? In R. Spinello & H. Tavani (Eds.), Intellectual property rights in a networked world: Theory and practice (pp. 67–81). New Brunswick, NJ: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Leo XIII. (1956). Rerum novarum. In A. Fremantle (Ed.), The papal encyclicals in their historical contexts. New York: Mentor-Omega. Original work published 1891.Google Scholar
  8. Locke, J. (1690). The second treatise on government. Available at http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtreat.htm.
  9. Moore, A. (2001). Intellectual property and information control. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy. State, Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Shiffrin, S. (2001). Lockean arguments for private intellectual property. In S. Munzer (Ed.), New essays in the legal and political theory of property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations