Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 29–38

e-Trust and reputation

Original Paper

Abstract

Trust online can be a hazardous affair; many are trustworthy, but some people use the anonymity of the web to behave very badly indeed. So how can we improve the quality of evidence for trustworthiness provided online? I focus on one of the devices we use to secure others’ trustworthiness: tracking past conduct through online reputation systems. Yet existing reputation systems face problems. I analyse these, and in the light of this develop some principles for system design, towards overcoming these challenges. In providing better evidence for trustworthiness online, so we can also encourage people actually to be trustworthy more often, which is an ethically welcome outcome.

Keywords

e-trust Internet Reputation systems Trust Trustworthiness 

References

  1. Acton, H. B. (1974). The idea of a spiritual power. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bacharach, M., & Gambetta, D. (2001). Trust in Signs. In K. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 148–184). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, G., & Pettit, P. (2004). Esteem, identifiability and the internet. Analyse und Kritik, 26(1), 139–157.Google Scholar
  4. Donadio, R. (2010). Larger threat is seen in google case. New York Times. Dated February 24, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html?_r=1. Accessed September 9, 2010.
  5. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Jurca R., & Faltings, B. (2006). Minimum payments that reward honest reputation feedback. Proceedings of the 7 th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 190–199). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  7. Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Holton, R. (1994). Deciding to trust, coming to believe. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72(1), 63–76.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Horsburgh, H. J. N. (1960). The ethics of trust. Philosophical Quarterly, 10, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., & Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 618–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marti, S., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2006). Taxonomy of trust: Categorizing P2P reputation systems. Computer Networks, 50(4), 472–484.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, N., Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2005). Eliciting informative feedback: The peer-prediction method. Management Science, 51(9), 1359–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pettit, P. (2004). Trust, reliance and the internet. Analyse und Kritik, 26(1), 108–121.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Pew Research Center. (2010). Trend data. Pew internet and American life project. Dated September 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Static-Pages/Trend-Data/Online-Activites-Total.aspx. Accessed November 19, 2010.
  16. Reid, T. (1983). Thomas Reid’s inquiry and essays. In: R. E. Beanblossom & K. Lehrer (Eds.), Indianopolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  17. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye (Ed.), The Economics of the internet and E-commerce (pp. 127–157). Oxford: JAI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., & Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9(2), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rohrer, F. (2009) The perils of five-star reviews. BBC news magazine. Dated June 25, 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8118577.stm. Accessed February 13, 2010.
  21. Sanchez, M. C. (2008). The web difference: A legal and normative rationale against liability for online reproduction of third-party defamatory content. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 22(1), 301–320.Google Scholar
  22. Snijders, C., & Zijdeman, R. (2004). Reputation and internet auctions: eBay and beyond. Analyse und Kritik, 26(1), 158–184.Google Scholar
  23. State of New York Attorney General’s Office. (2009). ‘Attorney General Cuomo secures settlement with plastic surgery franchise that flooded internet with false positive reviews.’ Retrieved July 14, 2009, from http://www.ag.ny.gov/media_center/2009/July/july14b_09.html. Accessed February 15, 2010.
  24. State of Texas. (2009). 81st legislature regular session. Sec. 33.07, Online Harassment. Dated September 1, 2009, from http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/81R/billtext/pdf/HB02003F.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2010.
  25. Whitty, M. T., & Joinson, A. N. (2009). Truth, lies and trust on the internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of CambridgeCambridge, CAMBSUK

Personalised recommendations