Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 185–197 | Cite as

A bundle of software rights and duties

Original paper

Abstract

Like the ownership of physical property, the issues computer software ownership raises can be understood as concerns over how various rights and duties over software are shared between owners and users. The powers of software owners are defined in software licenses, the legal agreements defining what users can and cannot do with a particular program. To help clarify how these licenses permit and restrict users’ actions, here I present a conceptual framework of software rights and duties that is inspired by the terms of various proprietary, open source, and free software licenses. To clarify the relationships defined by these rights and duties, this framework distinguishes between software creators (the original developer), custodians (those who can control its use), and users (those who utilise the software). I define the various rights and duties that can be shared between these parties and how these rights and duties relate to each other. I conclude with a brief example of how this framework can be used by defining the concepts of free software and copyleft in terms of rights and duties.

Keywords

Duties Rights Software licenses Software ownership Users Free software Copyleft 

References

  1. Cifuentes, C., & Fitzgerald, A. (1997). Copyright in shareware software distributed on the internet—the trumpet winsock case. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 456–464). Boston, MA: ACM.Google Scholar
  2. Classen, H. W. (2008). A practical guide to software licensing for licensees and licensors (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
  3. Hettinger, E. C. (1989). Justifying intellectual property. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 18, no. 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
  4. Hohfeld, W. N. (2001). Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Burlington, VT: Ashgate/Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  5. Honoré, A. M. (1968). Ownership. In A. G. Guest (Ed.), Oxford essays in jurisprudence, first series (pp. 107–147). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, J. (1988). The philosophy of intellectual property. Georgetown Law Journal, 77, no. 2, 287–366.Google Scholar
  7. Lessig, L. (2002). The future of ideas. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  8. Munzer, S. R. (1990). A theory of property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. St. Laurent, A. M. (2004). Understanding open source & free software licensing. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  10. Stamatoudi, I. A. (2002). Copyright and multimedia products: A comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Free Software Foundation. GNU general public license (Version 3). Free Software Foundation. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html.
  12. Free Software Foundation. The Free Software Definition. Free Software Foundation. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.
  13. Free Software Foundation. What is copyleft? Free Software Foundation. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html.
  14. Kuhn, B. M., & Stallman, R. M. Freedom or Power? http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/freedom-or-power.html.
  15. Raymond, E. S. The cathedral and the bazaar. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/.
  16. Sun Microsystems. Applets. http://www.java.sun.com/applets/.
  17. Turnbull, S. J. Xemacs vs. GNU emacs. http://www.xemacs.org/About/XEmacsVsGNUemacs.html.
  18. Watson, B. Philosophies of free software and intellectual property. http://www.ram.org/ramblings/philosophy/fmp/free-software-philosophy.html.
  19. Wilson, J. Ontology and the regulation of intellectual property. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~rehbjgs/docs/ontology-ip.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of History, Philosophy, Religion and ClassicsUniversity of QueenslandSt. Lucia, BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations