Transparency and social responsibility issues for Wikipedia
- 1.3k Downloads
Wikipedia is known as a free online encyclopedia. Wikipedia uses largely transparent writing and editing processes, which aim at providing the user with quality information through a democratic collaborative system. However, one aspect of these processes is not transparent—the identity of contributors, editors, and administrators. We argue that this particular lack of transparency jeopardizes the validity of the information being produced by Wikipedia. We analyze the social and ethical consequences of this lack of transparency in Wikipedia for all users, but especially students; we assess the corporate social performance issues involved, and we propose courses of action to compensate for the potential problems. We show that Wikipedia has the appearance, but not the reality, of responsible, transparent information production.
KeywordsCorporate social responsibility Ethics Higher education Information Transparency Wikipedia
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abrams, L. C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64–77.Google Scholar
- Anonymous (2007). Fact or fiction? Online encyclopedias. The Economist (March 12): 1.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. (2008). How does Wikipedia measure up? The Quill, 96(9), 16–19.Google Scholar
- Badke, W. (2008). What to do with Wikipedia. Online, 32(2), 48–50.Google Scholar
- Cohen, N. (2007). A contributor to Wikipedia has his fictional side. The New York Times, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/05/technology/05wikipedia.html?ref=business (Last visit 3/5/2007).
- Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Kamm, O. (2007). Wisdom? More like dumbness of the crowds. TimesOnline, Electronic Source. URL: http://www.timesonline.com.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article2267665.ece (Last visit 8/17/2007).
- Kirtley, J. (2006). Web of lies: A vicious Wikipedia entry underscores the difficulty of holding anyone responsible for misinformation on the internet. American Journalism Review, 28(1), 66.Google Scholar
- Levy, S. (2007). Invasion of the web amateurs. Newsweek, 149(12), 16.Google Scholar
- Mitnick, B. M. (1999). Credibility and the theory of testaments, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Chicago, IL, August.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Boston: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Remy, M. (2002). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Online Information Review, 26(6), 434–435.Google Scholar
- Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Tapscott, D., & Ticoll, D. (2003). The naked corporation: How the age of transparency will revolutionize business. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Vaccaro, A. (2006). Privacy, security and transparency: ICT-related ethical perspectives and contrasts in contemporary firms. In E. Howcroft, E. Trauth, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009a). Corporate dynamic transparency: The new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics and Information Technology.Google Scholar
- Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009b). ICT and an NGO: Difficulties in attempting to be extremely transparent. Ethics and Information Technology, published online 29 January.Google Scholar
- Weimer, D. L., & Vining, A. R. (1992). Policy analysis: Concepts and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Wood, D. J. (1994). Business and society (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Wood, D. J. (2007). Business ethics: Text and workbook. Cedar Falls, IA: Woodhaven Press, LLC.Google Scholar