Advertisement

Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics?

  • Antonino VaccaroEmail author
  • Peter Madsen
Original paper

Abstract

The term “corporate transparency” is frequently used in scholarly discussions of business ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR); however, it remains a volatile and imprecise term, often defined incompletely as “information disclosure” accomplished through standardized reporting. Based on the results of empirical studies of organizational behaviors, this paper identifies a new set of managerial practices based on the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and particularly Internet-based tools. These practices are resulting in what can be termed “dynamic transparency.” ICT allows for an informational environment characterized by two-way exchange between corporations and their stakeholders, which fosters a more collaborative marketplace. It is proposed that such dynamic information sharing, conducted by means of ICT, drives organizations to display greater openness and accountability, and more transparent operations, which benefit both the corporations and their constituents. One of the most important outcomes that will accrue to consumers and other individuals is the “right to know,” especially about corporate strategies and activities that might directly affect their quality of life. This paper demonstrates that dynamic transparency is more desirable and more effective than the more common “static transparency” where firms’ information disclosure is one-way, usually in response to government regulation. We present three ethical arguments to justify the implementation by business firms of dynamic transparency and demonstrate that their doing so is related to CSR and to augment and complement stakeholder engagement and dialogue. The paper concludes with a summary of the possible limits to and the problems involved in the implementation of dynamic transparency for corporations, and suggests some strategies to counter them.

Keywords

Transparency Information and communication technologies Corporate social responsibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for ‹Lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audi, R. (2008). Some dimensions of trust in business practices: From financial and product representation to licensure and voting. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bushman, R., Piotroski, J., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bushman, R., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87.Google Scholar
  5. Capurro, R. (2005). Privacy. An intercultural perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cramer, J. (2003). Learning about corporate social responsibility: The Dutch experience, national initiative for sustainable development (NIDO). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2008). Business ethics. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., & Siegel, D. (2008). The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dando, N., & Swift, T. (2003). Transparency and assurance: Minding the credibility gap. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darlin, D. (2006) The last stand of the “6-percenters?”, The New York Times, September 3, p. 15.Google Scholar
  11. Dellarocas, C. (2006). Strategic manipulation of internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Science, 52(10), 1577–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Eggert, A., & Helm, S. (2003). Exploring the impact of relationship transparency on business relationship- a cross sectional study among purchasing managers in Germany. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(2), 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Espinosa-Pizke, M. (1999). Business ethics and accounting information. An analysis of the Spanish code of best practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(3), 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fleischmann, K. R., & Wallace, W. A. (2005). A covenant with transparency: Opening the black box of models. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederick, W. (2006). Corporation, be good! the story of corporate social responsibility. Dog Ear Publishing, Inc: Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  17. Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D. (2003). The political economy of transparency: What makes disclosure policies sustainable. Ash Institute for democratic governance and innovation, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, OPS-02-03.Google Scholar
  18. Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D., Fagotto E. (2004a). Transparency policies: Two possible futures. Alfred Taubman center for state and local government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Taubman Policy Brief PB-2007-1.Google Scholar
  20. Fung, A., Graham, M., Weil, D., Fagotto, E. (2004b). The political economy of transparency: What makes disclosure policies effective?. Ash Institute for democratic governance and innovation, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, OPS-03-04.Google Scholar
  21. Gemmill, G. (1996). Transparency and liquidity: A study of block trades on the london stock exchange under different publication rules. Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1765–1790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giles, J. (2005). Special report: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. Nature, 438, 900–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guy, S., & Simon, M. (1996). Transforming urban infrastructure provision—The emerging logic of demand side management. Policy Studies, 17(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartmann, P., & Ibáñez, V. A. (2007). Managing customer loyalty in liberalized residential energy markets: The impact of energy branding”. Energy Policy, 35, 2661–2672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henriques, A. (2001). Civil society and social auditing. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10, 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hess, D. (2007). Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453–476.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, D., & Mulvey, J. M. (1995). Accountability and computer decision systems. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jonker, B., & Ziekemeyer, M. (2005). Wake up call—human resource management (HRM): An orientation on company models anticipating ageing. International Congress Series, 1280, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaptein, M. (2004). Business codes of multinational firms: What do they say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaptein, M., & Van Tulder, R. (2003). Toward effective stakeholder dialogue. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leet, E. H., & Wallace, W. A. (1994). Society’s role in the ethics of modeling”. In W. A. Wallace (Ed.), Ethics in modeling. Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  33. Lennerfors, T. T. (2007). The transformation of transparency–on the act on public procurement and the right to appeal in the context of the war on corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Markard, J., & Holt, E. (2003). Disclosure of electricity products—lessons from consumer research as guidance for energy policy. Energy Policy, 31(14), 1459–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  36. Mathews, M. R. (1995). Social and environmental accounting: A practical demonstration of ethical concern? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(8), 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
  38. New York Times (2007). Whole Foods Chief Apologizes for Posts. Last access, October 11, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/18/business/18whole.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.
  39. Online Etymological Dictionary (2007). Last access December 18,␣2007, from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=transparent&searchmode=none.
  40. Owen, D. L., & Swift, T. (2001). Introduction: Social accounting, reporting and auditing: Beyond the rhetoric. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10, 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Owen, D. L., Swift, T., Humphrey, T. C., & Bowerman, M. (2000). The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, 9(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pagano, B. (2004). The transparency edge. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Quaak, L., Theo, A., & John, G. (2007). Transparency of corporate social responsibility in Dutch breweries. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap press of Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  46. Redfin (2008). How We’re Different. Last access on January 6, 2008, from http://www.redfin.com/stingray/do/how_different.
  47. Schwartz, J. (2007). Transparency lost in the fog, The New York Times. Last access July 27, 2007, available at the http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/business/yourmoney/08fog.html?ex=1333684800&en=4bb6b8922af61b02&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss.
  48. Sison, A. J. G. (2001). Infomediarios: Campo de acción y valor (Infomediaries: Field of Action and Value) Iniciativa emprendedora y empresa familiar (Barcelona: Ediciones Deusto, S.A.), 27 (March-April), 24–28.Google Scholar
  49. Soh, C., Markus, M. L., & Huat Goh, K. (2006). Electronic marketplaces and price transparency: Strategy, information technology, and success. MIS quarterly, 30(2), 705–723.Google Scholar
  50. Tanimoto, K., & Suzuki, K. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Japan: Analysing the participating companies in global reporting initiative. Working Paper No. 208 Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.Google Scholar
  51. Tapscott, D., & Ticoll, D. (2003). The naked corporation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Thompson, C. (2007). The see through CEO. Wired, 15(04). Last visit July 28, 2007, available at the http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/wired40_ceo.html.
  53. Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2008). The ethics of information transparency. In A. Vaccaro, P. Madsen, & H. Horta (Eds.), Transparency and information and communication technologies: Social responsibility and accountability in business and education. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophical Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  54. Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vaccaro, A. (2006). Privacy, security and transparency: ICT-related ethical perspectives and contrasts in contemporary firms. In D. Howcroft, E. Trauth, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Social inclusion: Societal and organizational implications for information systems. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firms’ information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In J. Berleur (Ed.), Social informatics: An information society for all?. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2007). ICT. Non governmental organizations and transparency: Ethical concerns and perspectives. Proceedings of CEPE, 2007, 410–417.Google Scholar
  58. Vaccaro, A. & Madsen, P. (2009). ICT and an NGO: Difficulties in attempting to be extremely transparent. Forthcoming in Ethics and Information Technology. doi  10.1007/s10676-009-9180-3 (online first).
  59. Vaccaro, A., Madsen, P., & Horta, H. (2008). Transparency and information and communication technologies: Social responsibility and accountability in business and education. Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center.Google Scholar
  60. Van Buren III, H. J. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3), 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Waddock, S. (2004). Creating corporate accountability: Foundational principles to make corporate citizenship real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weil, D., Fung, A., Graham, M., & Fagotto, E. (2006). The effectiveness of regulatory disclosure policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, C. C. (2005). Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Business & Society, 44(3), 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Center for Ethics Business and EconomicsCatholic University of PortugalLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations