Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 105–112 | Cite as

The ethics of information transparency

  • Matteo Turilli
  • Luciano Floridi
Original Paper


The paper investigates the ethics of information transparency (henceforth transparency). It argues that transparency is not an ethical principle in itself but a pro-ethical condition for enabling or impairing other ethical practices or principles. A new definition of transparency is offered in order to take into account the dynamics of information production and the differences between data and information. It is then argued that the proposed definition provides a better understanding of what sort of information should be disclosed and what sort of information should be used in order to implement and make effective the ethical practices and principles to which an organisation is committed. The concepts of “heterogeneous organisation” and “autonomous computational artefact” are further defined in order to clarify the ethical implications of the technology used in implementing information transparency. It is argued that explicit ethical designs, which describe how ethical principles are embedded into the practice of software design, would represent valuable information that could be disclosed by organisations in order to support their ethical standing.


Information transparency Semantic information Computer ethics Software design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



One of us, Turilli, wishes to thank the Director of the Centre for Ethics and Economics and Business for his kind invitation to present a previous version of this paper at the conference ICT, transparency and social responsibility, 7–9 October, 2007 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal. Turilli also wishes to thank all the conference participants, particularly Deborah Johnson, Jeroen van den Hoven and Antonino Vaccaro for their useful feedback. Special thanks are extended to the Oxford e-Science Research Centre for their financial and scientific support. We both express our gratitude to members of the IEG, University of Oxford, and of the GPI, University of Hertfordshire, for their critique of earlier versions of this work. We remain the only persons responsible for any of its shortcomings.


  1. Ahrens, M. (2006). Computer and computer peripheral fires with a discussion of batteries. Quincy, MA: NFPA.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, T. (2007). International corporate governance: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The professions and corporate governance. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. DiPiazza, S. A., & Eccles, R. G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Floridi, L. (2004). Open problems in the philosophy of information. Metaphilosophy, 35, 554–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Floridi, L. (2006). The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(4), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Floridi, L. (2007). In defence of the veridical nature of semantic information. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 3(1), 31–41.Google Scholar
  8. Floridi, L. (2008). Data. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. Detroit: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods (UW CSE Technical Report 02-12-01). Department of Computer Science and Engineering: Seattle, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  10. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M. W., & Science Museum (Great Britain) (Eds.). (2001). Biotechnology, 1996–2000: The years of controversy. London: Science Museum.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, B. (1995). Ethical banking: The case of the co-operative bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(12), 1005–1013.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Lamming, R., Caldwell, N., & Harrison, D. (2004). Developing the concept of transparency for use in supply relationships. British Journal of Management, 15, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Löfstedt, R. E., & Renn, O. (1997). The Brent Spar controversy: An example of risk communication gone wrong. Risk Analysis, 17(2), 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Magretta, J. (1997). Growth through global sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 78–88.Google Scholar
  15. Mallin, C. (2002). The relationship between corporate governance, transparency and financial disclosure. Corporate governance, 10(4), 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moll, R. (2003). Ford motor company and the firestone tyre recall. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(3), 200–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moor, J. H. (1997). Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. SIGCAS Computer and Society, 27(3), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanders, J., & Turilli, M. (2007). Dynamics of control. In TASE 2007 (pp. 440–449).Google Scholar
  19. Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). The metaphilosophy of information. Minds and Machines, 17(3), 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sequoiah-Grayson, S. (2007). Information gain from inference. In LogKCA-07, international workshop on logic and philosophy of knowledge, rationality, and action (pp. 351–368). Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain: The University of Basque Country Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sparkes, R. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(3), 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turilli, M. (2007). Ethical protocols design. Ethics and Information Technology, 8, 253–262.Google Scholar
  23. Turilli, M. (2008). Ethics and the practice of software design. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & K. Waelbers (Eds.), Current issues in computing and philosophy. Amsterdam: IOS.Google Scholar
  24. Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2006). Firm information transparency: Ethical questions in the information age. In Social informatics: An information society for all? In remembrance of Rob Kling (pp. 145–156). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Warwick, S. (2001). Is copyright ethical? An examination of the theories, laws and practices regarding the private the private ownership of intellectual work in the United States. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (pp.␣263–279). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  26. Winkler, B. (2000). Which kind of transparency? On the need for clarity in monetary policy-making. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford University Computing Laboratory (OUCL)University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Oxford e-Research Centre (OeRC)University of OxfordOxfordUK
  3. 3.Information Ethics Group (IEG)University of OxfordOxfordUK
  4. 4.Research Group in Philosophy of Information (GPI)University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK
  5. 5.Centre for Ethics and Economics and BusinessUniversidade Católica PortugueasaLisbonPortugal
  6. 6.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations