Design for a common world: On ethical agency and cognitive justice
- 298 Downloads
The paper discusses two answers to the question, How to address the harmful effects of technology? The first response proposes a complete separation of science from culture, religion, and ethics. The second response finds harm in the logic and method of science itself. The paper deploys a feminist technoscience approach to overcome these accounts of neutral or deterministic technological agency. In this technoscience perspective, agency is not an attribute of autonomous human users alone but enacted and performed in socio-material configurations of people and technology and their ‘intra-actions’. This understanding of agency is proposed as an alternative that opens up for the reconfiguration of design and use for more ethical effects, such as the cultivation of cognitive justice, the equal treatment and representation of different ways of knowing the world. The implication of this approach is that design becomes an adaptive and ongoing intra-active process in which more desirable configurations of people and technology become possible.
KeywordsCognitive justice Design Diversity of knowledge Ethical agency Feminist technoscience Intra-action Neutral technology Web directories
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adam, A. (2003). Feminist ethics for computer ethics. In C. Mörtberg, P. Elovaara, & A. Lundgren (Eds.), How do we make a difference: Information technology, transnational democracy, and gender (pp. 137–149). Luleå: University of Technology Luleå.Google Scholar
- Ballantyne, P. (2002). Collecting and propagating local development content: Synthesis and conclusions. Retrieved February 2008, from http://www.ftpiicd/files/research/reports/report7.pdf.
- Barad, K. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In M. Baglioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (2007) . Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Barney, D. (2004). The network society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- BBC. (2007). Warning of data ticking timebomb. Retrieved July 3, 2007, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6265976.stm.
- Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Brand. S. (1994). How buildings learn. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Christie, M. (2004). Words, ontologies and aboriginal databases. Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.cdu.edu.au/centres/ik/pdf/WordsOntologiesAbDB.pdf.
- Dams. (2000). World commission on. Dams and development: A new framework for decision-making. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
- Heeks, R. (2002). Failure, success and improvisation of information systems projects in developing countries. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
- Kraak, A. (1999). Western science, power and the marginalization of indigenous modes of knowledge production (Interpretative minutes of the discussion held on ‘Debates about Knowledge: Developing Countries Perspectives’ co-hosted by CHET and CSD). Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.chet.org.za/publications/Debates%20about%20Knowledge%20-%20Report.doc.
- Kwasnik, B. H. (1999). The role of classification in knowledge representation and discovery. Library Trends, 48(1), 22–48.Google Scholar
- MacDonell, P., Tagami, R., et al. (2003). Brian deer classification system. Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.slais.ubc.ca/courses/libr517/02–03-wt2/projects/deer/index.htm.
- Nanda, M. (2003a). Prophets facing backwards: Postmodern critiques of science and Hindu Nationalism in India. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Nanda, M. (2003b). Postmodernism, science and religious fundamentalism. Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=40.
- Nanda, M. (2006). How modern are we? Cultural contradictions of India’s Modernity. Economic and Political Weekly, 491–496.Google Scholar
- Pannekoek, F. (2001). Cyber imperialism and the marginalization of Canada’s indigenous peoples. In J.-P. Baillargeon (Ed.), The handing down of culture, smaller societies and globalization. Toronto: Grubstreet Books.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Rajagopal, B. (2001). The violence of development. The Washington Post, Washington. Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://mit.edu/phrj/publications/010808_washington_post.html.
- Rundle, M., & Conley, C. (2007). Ethical implications of emerging technologies: A survey. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- Shirky, C. (2006). Ontology is overrated: Categories, links, and tags. Retrieved April 23, 2007, from http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.
- Shiva, V. (1993). Monocultures of the mind: Perspectives on biodiversity and biotechnology. Dehra Dun: Natraj.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B. C. (2002). Can a computer adhere to the categorical imperative? A contemplation of the limits of transcendental ethics in IT. In I. Smit & G. E. Lasker (Eds.), Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making and human action (pp. 13–18). Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B. C. (2003). The moral and business value of information technology: What to do in case of a conflict? In N. Shun (Ed.), Creating business value with information technology: Challenges and solutions (pp. 187–202). Hershey: Idea-Group.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (2001). Human Development Report 2001: Making new technologies work for human development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
- van der Velden, M. (2006). A license to know: Regulatory tactics of a global network. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, et al. (Eds.), Cultural attitudes towards technology and communication 2006 (pp. 555–563). Murdoch: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
- van der Velden, M. (2007). Invisibility and the ethics of digitalization: Designing so as not to hurt others. In S. Hongladarom & C. Ess (Eds.), Information technology ethics: Cultural perspectives (pp. 81–93). London: Idea Group Reference.Google Scholar
- van der velden, M. (2008a) What's love got to do with IT? On Ethics and accountability in telling technology stories. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, et al. (Eds.), Cultural attitudes towards technology and communication 2008 (pp. 27-39). Murdoch: Murdoch University. Available at http://www.globalagenda.org/file/12.
- van der Velden, M. (2008b). Organising development knowledge: Towards situated classification work on the Web. Webology, 5(3), Article 60. Available at: http://www.webology.ir/2008/v5n3/a60.html.
- Verran, H. (2005). Personal communication per email, November 21, 2005.Google Scholar
- Visvanathan, S. (1988). On the annals of the laboratory state. In A. Nandi (Ed.), Science, hegemony, and violence: A requiem for modernity. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
- Visvanathan, S. (2000). Environmental values, policy, and conflict in India, 2000 (Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs). Retrieved 20 June 2008, from http://www.cceia.org/resources/articles_papers_reports/709.html/_res/id=sa_File1/709_visvanathan.pdf.
- Visvanathan, S. (2003). Progress and violence. In A. Lightman, D. Sarewitz, & C. Desser (Eds.), Living with the genie: Essays on technology and the quest for human mastery (pp. 157–180). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
- Visvanathan, S. (2007). Knowledge, justice and democracy. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and citizens (pp. 83–94). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Wilk, R. (1995). Learning to be local in Belize: Global systems of common difference. In D. Miller (Ed.), Worlds apart: Modernity through the prism of the local (pp. 110–135). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar