Advertisement

Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 243–254 | Cite as

Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust

  • Annamaria CarusiEmail author
Article

Abstract

The collaborative ‹Big Science’ approach prevalent in physics during the mid- and late-20th century is becoming more common in the life sciences. Often computationally mediated, these collaborations challenge researchers’ trust practices. Focusing on the visualisations that are often at the heart of this form of scientific practice, the paper proposes that the aesthetic aspects of these visualisations are themselves a way of securing trust. Kant’s account of aesthetic judgements in the Third Critique is drawn upon in order to show that the image-building capability of imagination, and the sensus communis, both of which are integral parts of aesthetic experience, play an important role in building and sustaining community in these forms of science. Kant’s theory shows that the aesthetic appeal of scientific visualisations is not isolated from two other dimensions of the visualisations: the cognitive-epistemic, aesthetic-stylistic and interpersonal dimensions, and that in virtue of these inter-relationships, visualisations contribute to building up the intersubjectively shared framework of agreement which is basic for trust.

Keywords

aesthetic epistemic image Kant science trust visualisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Research for the `Visualisations' section of this article was supported by ESRC grant no RES 149-25-1022. I would like to thank two anonymous referees for commentary.

References

  1. Araya A. The Hidden Side of Visualization. Techné, 7(2): 27–93, 2003Google Scholar
  2. H. Arendt. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. R. Beiner, editor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992Google Scholar
  3. Baier A. Trust and Anti-Trust. Ethics, 96: 231–260, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coady C.A.J. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992Google Scholar
  5. Fricker E. Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Mind, 104: 393–411, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Fricker. Trusting Others in the Sciences. A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33:373–383, 2002Google Scholar
  7. Goodwin C. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3): 606–633, 1994CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Hume D. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In L.A. Selby-Bigge, editor, Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. David Hume, p. 1777. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1902Google Scholar
  9. Ihde D. Bodies in Technology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis & London, 2002Google Scholar
  10. Kant I. Critique of Judgement. Trans. J.C. Meredith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952Google Scholar
  11. Keller E.F. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass, 2002Google Scholar
  12. Kemp M. Visualizations: The ‹Nature’ Book of Art and Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000Google Scholar
  13. Kessler E.A. Resolving the Nebulae: The Science and Art of Representing M51. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38: 477–491, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kusch M., Lipton P. Testimony: A primer. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33: 209–217, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Latour B. Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. 6: 1–40, 1986Google Scholar
  16. Lefèvre W. Galileo Engineer: Art and Modern Science. Science in Context, 14: 11–27, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch M., Edgerton S.Y. Jr. Aesthetics and digital image processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy. In G. Fyfe and J. Law, editor, Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. pp. 184–220. Routledge, London, 1988Google Scholar
  18. McAllister J. Beauty and Revolution in Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London, 1996Google Scholar
  19. Origgi G. Is Trust and Epistemological Notion? Episteme, 1: 1–12, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reid T. An Inquiry into the Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. In W.H. Bart, editor, The Works of Thomas Reid. Maclachlan & Stewart, Edinburgh, 1764Google Scholar
  21. Root-Bernstein R.S. Aesthetic Cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16(1): 61–77, 2002CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaeffer J. Sensus Communis in Vico and Gadamer. New Vico Studies, 5: 117–130, 1987Google Scholar
  23. Shapin S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in 17th Century England. University of Chicago Press, Chicago London, 1994Google Scholar
  24. Tauber A.I. editor. The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996Google Scholar
  25. E. Welsh, M. Jirotka, and D. Gavaghan. Post-Genomic Science: Cross-disciplinary and Large-Scale Collaborative Research and its Organisational and Technological Challenges for the Scientific Research Process. Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 364(1843): 1533–1549, 2006.Google Scholar
  26. E. Winsberg. Models of Success vs. the Success of the Models: Reliability Without Truth. Synthese, 152: 1–19, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford e-Research CentreOxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations