Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust
- 276 Downloads
The collaborative ‹Big Science’ approach prevalent in physics during the mid- and late-20th century is becoming more common in the life sciences. Often computationally mediated, these collaborations challenge researchers’ trust practices. Focusing on the visualisations that are often at the heart of this form of scientific practice, the paper proposes that the aesthetic aspects of these visualisations are themselves a way of securing trust. Kant’s account of aesthetic judgements in the Third Critique is drawn upon in order to show that the image-building capability of imagination, and the sensus communis, both of which are integral parts of aesthetic experience, play an important role in building and sustaining community in these forms of science. Kant’s theory shows that the aesthetic appeal of scientific visualisations is not isolated from two other dimensions of the visualisations: the cognitive-epistemic, aesthetic-stylistic and interpersonal dimensions, and that in virtue of these inter-relationships, visualisations contribute to building up the intersubjectively shared framework of agreement which is basic for trust.
Keywordsaesthetic epistemic image Kant science trust visualisation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Research for the `Visualisations' section of this article was supported by ESRC grant no RES 149-25-1022. I would like to thank two anonymous referees for commentary.
- Araya A. The Hidden Side of Visualization. Techné, 7(2): 27–93, 2003Google Scholar
- H. Arendt. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. R. Beiner, editor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992Google Scholar
- Coady C.A.J. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1992Google Scholar
- E. Fricker. Trusting Others in the Sciences. A Priori or Empirical Warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33:373–383, 2002Google Scholar
- Hume D. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. In L.A. Selby-Bigge, editor, Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. David Hume, p. 1777. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1902Google Scholar
- Ihde D. Bodies in Technology. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis & London, 2002Google Scholar
- Kant I. Critique of Judgement. Trans. J.C. Meredith, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1952Google Scholar
- Keller E.F. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors and Machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass, 2002Google Scholar
- Kemp M. Visualizations: The ‹Nature’ Book of Art and Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000Google Scholar
- Latour B. Visualisation and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. 6: 1–40, 1986Google Scholar
- Lynch M., Edgerton S.Y. Jr. Aesthetics and digital image processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy. In G. Fyfe and J. Law, editor, Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations. pp. 184–220. Routledge, London, 1988Google Scholar
- McAllister J. Beauty and Revolution in Science. Cornell University Press, Ithaca & London, 1996Google Scholar
- Reid T. An Inquiry into the Mind on the Principles of Common Sense. In W.H. Bart, editor, The Works of Thomas Reid. Maclachlan & Stewart, Edinburgh, 1764Google Scholar
- Schaeffer J. Sensus Communis in Vico and Gadamer. New Vico Studies, 5: 117–130, 1987Google Scholar
- Shapin S. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in 17th Century England. University of Chicago Press, Chicago London, 1994Google Scholar
- Tauber A.I. editor. The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996Google Scholar
- E. Welsh, M. Jirotka, and D. Gavaghan. Post-Genomic Science: Cross-disciplinary and Large-Scale Collaborative Research and its Organisational and Technological Challenges for the Scientific Research Process. Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 364(1843): 1533–1549, 2006.Google Scholar
- E. Winsberg. Models of Success vs. the Success of the Models: Reliability Without Truth. Synthese, 152: 1–19, 2006.Google Scholar