Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 215–226 | Cite as

Ethical pluralism and global information ethics

Article

Abstract

A global information ethics that seeks to avoid imperialistic homogenization must conjoin shared norms while simultaneously preserving the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples. I argue that a global information ethics may fulfill these requirements by taking up an ethical pluralism – specifically Aristotle’s pros hen [“towards one”] or “focal” equivocals. These ethical pluralisms figure centrally in both classical and contemporary Western ethics: they further offer important connections with the major Eastern ethical tradition of Confucian thought. Both traditions understand ethical judgment to lead to and thus require ethical pluralism – i.e., an acceptance of more than one judgment regarding the interpretation and application of a shared ethical norm. Both traditions invoke notions of resonance and harmony to articulate pluralistic structures of connection alongside irreducible differences. Specific examples within Western computer and information ethics demonstrate these pluralisms in fact working in praxis. After reviewing further resonances and radical differences between Western and Eastern views, I then argue that emerging conceptions of privacy and data privacy protection laws in China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Thailand in fact constitute a robust, pros hen pluralism with Western conceptions. In both theory and in praxis, then, this pluralism thus fulfills the requirement for a global information ethics that holds shared norms alongside the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples.

Key words

ethical pluralism judgment harmony privacy data privacy protection ethical relativism ethical dogmatism John Rawls Charles Taylor Confucius Plato Aristotle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames R., Rosemont H. (1998). The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York, Ballantine BooksGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquinas T. (1969). Summa Theologiae. Vol. 1: The Existence of God: Part One: Questions 1–13. Garden City, NY, Image BooksGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle, Metaphysics I–IX (Vol XVII, Aristotle in Twenty-Three Volumes). H. Tredennick, trans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, Topica. H. Tredennick & E.␣S. Forster, trans. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1960Google Scholar
  5. J. Bizer. Grundrechte im Netz: Von der freien Meinungsäußerung bis zum Recht auf Eigentum. In C.␣Schulzki-Haddouti (Hrsg.), Bürgerrechte im Netz, pp.␣21–29. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn. Available online: <http://www.bpb.de/publikationen/UZX6DW,,0,B%fcrgerrechte_im_Netz.html>, 2003Google Scholar
  6. Boss J. (2005). Analyzing Moral Issues, 3rd ed. Boston, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  7. Burrell D. (1973). Analogy and Philosophical Language. New Haven, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Capurro R. (2005). Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology 7(1: March):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan J. (2003). Confucian Attitudes Towards Ethical Pluralism. In R. Madsen, T.B. Strong (eds), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 129–153Google Scholar
  10. Y. Chen. Privacy in China. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2005Google Scholar
  11. Collste G. (2005). Is Religious Pluralism Possible?. In Collste G. (eds), Possibilities of Religious Pluralism. Linköping, Linköping University Electronic Press, pp. 48–61Google Scholar
  12. R.T. De George. Business Ethics. 5th edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999Google Scholar
  13. Eickelman D.F. (2003). Islam and Ethical Pluralism. In Madsen R., Strong T.B. (eds), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 161–180Google Scholar
  14. R. Elberfeld. Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik [Resonance as a Fundamental Motif of East Asian Ethics]. in R. Elberfeld and G. Wohlfart, editors, Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen [Comparative Ethics: The Good Life between Cultures], pp. 131–141. Edition Chora, Cologne, 2002Google Scholar
  15. D. Elgesem. What is Special About the Ethical Issues in Online Research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3): 195–203. Available online: <http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_elgesem.html>, 2002Google Scholar
  16. C. Ess. Analogy in the Critical Works: Kant's Transcendental Philosophy as Analectical Thought. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI, 1983Google Scholar
  17. Ess C. (2003). The Cathedral or the Bazaar? The AoIR Document on Internet Research Ethics as an Exercise in Open Source Ethics. In Consolvo M. (eds), Internet Research Annual Volume 1: Selected Papers From the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000–2002. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 95–103Google Scholar
  18. Ess C. (2004a). Beyond contemptus mundi and Cartesian Dualism: Western Resurrection of the Bodysubject and (re)new(ed) Coherencies with Eastern Approaches to Life/Death. In Wohlfart G., Moeller H.-G. (eds), Philosophie des Todes: Death Philosophy East and West. Munich, Chora Verlag, pp. 15–36Google Scholar
  19. Ess C. (2004b). Moral Imperatives for Life in an Intercultural Global Village. In Cavalier R. (eds), The Internet and Our Moral Lives. Albany, New York, State University of New York Press, pp. 161–193Google Scholar
  20. C. Ess. Can the Local Reshape the Global? Ethical Imperatives for Humane Intercultural Communication Online. In J. Frühbauer, R. Capurro and T. Hausmanninger, editors, Localizing the Internet. Ethical Aspects in an Intercultural Perspective (Volume 4, ICIE Series), 2005aGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Ess. What is Information Ethics? <http://www. drury.edu/ess/CAP04/cap04infoethics.html>, 2005bGoogle Scholar
  22. Ess C. (2005c). “Lost in Translation”?: Intercultural Dialogues on Privacy and Information Ethics (Introduction to special issue on Privacy and Data Privacy Protection in Asia). Ethics and Information Technology 7(1: March): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. C. Ess. Culture and Global Networks: Hope for a Global Ethics? In Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, editors, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Ess and the AoIR ethics working group. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Available online: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdfGoogle Scholar
  25. L. Floridi. Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. In C. Ess and M. Thorseth, editors, Global Information Ethics: Cross-cultural Approaches to Emancipation, Privacy and Regulation, special issue of Ethics and Information Technology, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  26. Galston W.A. (2003). Liberal Egalitarian Attitudes Toward Ethical Pluralism. In Madsen R., Strong T.B. (eds), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press, pp. 25–41Google Scholar
  27. Haldane J.H. (2003). Natural Law and Ethical Pluralism. In Madsen R., Strong T.B. (eds), The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 89–114Google Scholar
  28. Hinman L. (1998). Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Fort Worth, Harcourt, BraceGoogle Scholar
  29. Hjarvard S. (2002). Mediated Encounters. An Essay on the Role of Communication Media in the Creation of Trust in the ‚Global Metropolis. In Gitte S., Thomas T. (eds), Global Encounters: Media and Cultural Transformation. Luton, University of Luton Press, pp. 69–84Google Scholar
  30. S. Hongladarom. Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess, editors, Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspectives. Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson D. (2001). Computer Ethics. 3 rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  32. W.T. Jones. A History of Western Philosophy, 2nd ed., Vol. I: The Classical Mind. Brace & World, New York, Harcourt, 1969Google Scholar
  33. Kitiyadisai K. (2005). Privacy Rights and Protection: Foreign Values in Modern Thai Context. Ethics and Information Technology 7(1: March):17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kymlicka W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford, Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, Pei-Chun and Caroline Henkes. Privacy Research: Privacy Sense in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Unpublished MS: Universität Trier, 2004Google Scholar
  36. Open image in new windowYao-huai Open image in new window. Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 7–15, 2005Google Scholar
  37. Madsen R., Strong T. (eds). (2003). The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakada M., Takanori T. (2005). Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology 7(1: March):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. NESH (National Committee for Research Ethics in the␣Social Sciences and the Humanities). Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Law and␣the␣Humanities. <http://www.etikkom.no/NESH/guidelines.htm>, 2001Google Scholar
  40. Plato’s Republic. G.M.A. Grube, trans. Hackett, Indianapolis, 1974Google Scholar
  41. Ramasoota P. (2001). Privacy: A Philosophical Sketch and a Search for a Thai Perception. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities 4(2: September):89–107Google Scholar
  42. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Rawls J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Reidenberg J.R. (2000). Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review 52:1315–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stahl B.C. (2004). Responsible Management of Information Systems. Hershey, Pennsylvania, Idea Group PublishingGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Tang. Approaches to Privacy – The Hong Kong Experience. <http://www.pco.org.hk/english/infocentre/speech_20020222.html>, 2002Google Scholar
  47. Tu W.-M. (1999). Humanity as Embodied Love: Exploring Filial Piety as a Global Ethical Perspective. In Zlomislic M., Goicoechea D. (eds), Jen Agape Tao with Tu Wei-Ming. Binghampton, NY, Institute of Global Cultural Studies, pp. 28–37Google Scholar
  48. H. Veatch. A Critique of Benedict. In J.R. Weinberg and K.E. Yandell, editors, Theory of Knowledge. Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, 1971Google Scholar
  49. J. Walther. Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human Subjects Issues and Methodological Myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3). Available online: <http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_walther. html>, 2002Google Scholar
  50. Warren K.J. (1990). The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism. Environmental Ethics 12(2: (Summer)):123–146MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Studies CenterDrury UniversitySpringfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations