Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 175–186 | Cite as

Towards an ontological foundation of information ethics

Article

Abstract

The paper presents, firstly, a brief review of the long history of information ethics beginning with the Greek concept of parrhesia or freedom of speech as analyzed by Michel Foucault. The recent concept of information ethics is related particularly to problems which arose in the last century with the development of computer technology and the internet. A broader concept of information ethics as dealing with the digital reconstruction of all possible phenomena leads to questions relating to digital ontology. Following Heidegger’s conception of the relation between ontology and metaphysics, the author argues that ontology has to do with Being itself and not just with the Being of beings which is the matter of metaphysics. The primary aim of an ontological foundation of information ethics is to question the metaphysical ambitions of digital ontology understood as today’s pervading understanding of Being. The author analyzes some challenges of digital technology, particularly with regard to the moral status of digital agents. The author argues that information ethics does not only deal with ethical questions relating to the infosphere. This view is contrasted with arguments presented by Luciano Floridi on the foundation of information ethics as well as on the moral status of digital agents. It is argued that a reductionist view of the human body as digital data overlooks the limits of digital ontology and gives up one basis for ethical orientation. Finally issues related to the digital divide as well as to intercultural aspects of information ethics are explored – and long and short-term agendas for appropriate responses are presented.

Keywords

digital agents digital ontology human existence information ethics infosphere metaphysics reductionism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Ms Heather Bradshaw (Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics) for her comments and criticisms as well as for polishing my English.

References

  1. Aristotle, Physica. W.D. Ross, editor. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950Google Scholar
  2. J. Assmann, 2000 Das kulturelle Gedächtnis C.H. Beck MunichGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. In Berkeley’s Philosophical Writings, pp. 39–128. Macmillan, New York, 1965Google Scholar
  4. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and the Humanities, 2003. Online: http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration. htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgman A., 1992 Crossing the Postmodern Divide University of Chicago Press ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Boss M., 1975 Grundriss der Medizin und der Psychologie Huber BernGoogle Scholar
  7. Capurro R., 1986 Hermeneutik der Fachinformation Alber FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Capurro. “Herausdrehung aus dem Platonismus”. Heideggers existenziale Erstreckung der Sinnlichkeit. In Hans-Helmut Gander, editor, “Verwechselt mich vor allem nicht!” Heidegger und Nietzsche, pp. 139–156. Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main. 1994a. Online: http://www.capurro.de/platonismus.htmGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Capurro. Bewusstsein oder Dasein? In J. Albertz, editor, Das Bewusstsein – philosophische, psychologische und physiologische Aspekte, pp. 161–169. Freie Akademie, Berlin, 1994b. Online: http://www.capurro.de/bew.htmGoogle Scholar
  10. Capurro R., 1995 Leben im Informationszeitalter Akademie Verlag BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. R. Capurro. On Artificiality. In Istituto Metodologico Economico Statistico (IMES), Laboratory for the Culture of the Artificial, University of Urbino, editor, IMES-LCA WP-15/11/1995a. Online: http://www.capurro.de/artif.htmGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Capurro. Beiträge zu einer digitalen Ontologie, 2001. Online: http://www.capurro.de/digont.htmGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Capurro. Angeletics – A Message Theory. In H.H. Diebner and L. Ramsay, editors, Hierarchies of Communication, pp. 58–71. ZKM Verlag, Karlsruhe, 2003. Online: http://www.capurro.de/angeletics_zkm.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. Capurro R., 2005 Privacy. An Intercultural Perspective Ethics and Information Technology 7: 37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Capurro. Philosophical Presuppositions of Producing and Patenting Organic Life. In A. Wierciński, editor, The Hermeneutic Turn in Phenomenology, pp. 571–581, The Hermeneutic Press, Toronto, 2005a. Online: http://www.capurro.de/patent.htmlGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Capurro. Intercultural Information Ethics. In R. Capurro, J. Frühbauer and T. Hausmanninger, editors, Localizing the␣Internet. Ethical Issues in Intercultural Perspective. Munich, Fink Verlag 2006a (in print)Google Scholar
  17. R. Capurro. Ethik der Informationsgesellschaft. Ein interkultureller Versuch. In Wolfgang Coy, editor, Shapes of the Things to Come – Die Zukunft der Informationsgesellschaft. Berlin 2006b (in print). Online: http://www. capurro.de/parrhesia.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Capurro and C. Pingel. Ethical Issues of Online Communication. Ethics and Information Technology, 4: 189–194, 2002. Online: http://www.nyu.edu/projects/ nissenbaum/ethics_cap_full.htmlGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Capurro. Towards an Information Ecology. In I. Wormell, editor, Information Quality. Definitions and Dimensions, pp.␣122–139. Taylor Graham, London, 1990. Online: http://www.capurro.de/nordinf.htmGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Capurro, J. Frühbauer and T. Hausmanninger, editors, Localizing the Internet. Ethical Issues in Intercultural Perspective. Fink, Munich, 2006 (in print)Google Scholar
  21. M. Castells. The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture. Blackwell, Oxford, 1996, 1997, 1998Google Scholar
  22. D. Régis, 2000 Introduction à la médiologie Presses Universitaires de France ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. H.H. Diebner, 2003 Operational Hermeneutics and Communication In: H.H. Diebner, L. Ramsay, (eds.), Hierarchies of Communication ZKM Karlsruhe pp. 30–57Google Scholar
  24. M. Eldred. Draft Casting of a Digital Ontology. 2001. Online: http://www.webcom.com/artefact/dgtlon_e/ dgtlon.1e.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. EGE – European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body. Opinion No. 20 adopted on 16/03/2005. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/avis/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Feenberg and D. Barney, editors, Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, 2004Google Scholar
  27. L. Floridi, 2004. Preface In: L. Floridi, eds, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information Blackwell Malden, M.A pages xi–xivGoogle Scholar
  28. L. Floridi. On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4: 287–304, 2003. Online (pdf): http://www.wolfson.ox. ac.uk/∼floridi/ Google Scholar
  29. L. Floridi, 2001 Ethics in the Infosphere The Philosophers Magazine 6: 18–19Google Scholar
  30. L. Floridi. Information Ethics: On the Theoretical Foundations of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 1: 37–56, 1999. Online: http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/∼floridi/pdf/ieotfce.pdfGoogle Scholar
  31. Floridi L., J.W. Sanders, 2004 On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines 3: 349–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Floridi L, J.W. Sanders, 2002 Mapping the Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics Ethics and Information Technology 4: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. T.J. Froehlich. A Brief History of Information Ethics. Textos universitaris de bibliioteconomia i documentació, 3, 2004. Online: http://www.ub.es/bid/13froel2.htmGoogle Scholar
  34. B. Frohmann, 2000 Cyber Ethics: Bodies or Bytes? International Information & Library Review 32: 423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. M. Foucault. Discourse and Truth: the Problematization of Parrhesia. University of California at Berkeley, October–November 1983. Online: http://foucault.info/documents/parrhesia/ Google Scholar
  36. T. Hausmanninger and R. Capurro, Einleitung. Eine Schriftenreihe stellt sich vor. In R. Capurro and T.␣Hausmanninger, editors, Netzethik. Grundlegungsfragen der Internetethik, pp. 7–12. Fink, Munich, 2002Google Scholar
  37. M. Heidegger, 1976 Einführung in die Metaphysik Niemeyer TübingenGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Heidegger, 1979 Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Gesamtausgabe 20 Klostermann Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  39. M. Heidegger, 1983 Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Gesamtausgabe 29/30 Frankfurt am Main KlostermannGoogle Scholar
  40. M. Heidegger, Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1987Google Scholar
  41. M. Heidegger, 1991 Platon: Sophistes. Gesamtausgabe 19 Klostermann Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  42. O. Jahraus, 2004 Martin Heidegger. Eine Einführung Reclam StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  43. F. Jullien, 2005 Nourrir sa vie. Á l’écart du bonheur Seuil ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. I. Kant, 1977 Metaphysik der Sitten Suhrkamp Frankfurt am Main pp. 303–364Google Scholar
  45. I. Kant. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In I.␣Kant, editor, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, pp. 9–102, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1974Google Scholar
  46. T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, 1962Google Scholar
  47. E. Lévinas, 1968 Totalité et Infini. Essai sur l’extériorité M. Nijhoff The HagueGoogle Scholar
  48. P. Lévy, Collective intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World In Cyberspace. Translated by R. Bononno. Plenum Trade, New York, London, 197lGoogle Scholar
  49. N. Luhmann, 1987 Soziale Systeme Suhrkamp Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  50. A. MacIntyre, 1999 Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human beings Need the Virtues Open Court ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. M. Nagenborg, guest editor, Editorial. International Review of Information Ethics, 3: 1, 2005. Online: http://www.i-r-i-e.net/inhalt/003/003_editorial.pdfGoogle Scholar
  52. M. Nakada, T. Takanori, 2005 Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology Ethics and Information Technology 7: 27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. N. Negroponte, 1995 Being Digital Alfred A. Knopf New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. M. Negrotti, 1999 The Theory of the Artificial Intellect Books, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  55. M. Negrotti Naturoids, 2002 On the Nature of the Artificial. World Scientific New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  56. K.R. Popper, 1973 Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach Clarendon Press OxfordGoogle Scholar
  57. M. Riedel, H. Seubert and H. Padrutt, editors, Zwischen Philosophie, Medizin und Psychologie. Heidegger im Dialog mit Medard Boss. Böhlau Verlag, Köln, 2003Google Scholar
  58. T. Rosenfeldt, 2003 Sein, Seiendes, Seiendheit. Eine These Heideggers aus Sicht der analytischen Ontologie Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2: 99–121Google Scholar
  59. R. Scheule, R. Capurro and T. Hausmanninger, editors, Vernetzt gespalten. Der Digital Divide in ethischer Perspektive. Fink, Munich, 2004Google Scholar
  60. P. Sloterdijk, Sphären. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, 1998, 1999, 2004Google Scholar
  61. F. Sudweeks and C. Ess, editors, Cultural Attitudes towards Technology and Communication. Murdoch University, Murdoch, 2004Google Scholar
  62. G. Spencer Brown, 1973 Laws of Form Bantam Books New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. W. Sützl, 2004 Emancipación o violencia. Pacifismo estético en Gianni Vattimo Icaria BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  64. D. Tabachnick and T. Koivukoski, editors, Globalization, Technology and Philosophy. SUNY Press, New York, 2004Google Scholar
  65. G. Vattimo, 1985 La fine della modernità Garzanti Milano Google Scholar
  66. M. Walzer, 1994 Thick and Thin: Moral Arguments at Home and Abroad University of Notre Dame Press Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  67. J.W. Weckert. Trusting agents. In P. Brey, F. Grodzinsky and L. Introna, editors, Ethics of New Information Technology. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (CEPE2005), pp. 407–411. Center for Telematics and␣Information Technology (CTIT), Enschede, The␣Netherlands, 2005Google Scholar
  68. L. Wittgenstein, 1984 Philosophische Untersuchungen Suhrkamp Frankfurt am MainMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart (HdM) – Stuttgart Media UniversityStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations