Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 157–173 | Cite as

Flourishing Ethics

  • Terrell Ward BynumEmail author


This essay describes a new ethical theory that has begun to coalesce from the works of several scholars in the international computer ethics community. I call the new theory ‚Flourishing Ethics’ because of its Aristotelian roots, though it also includes ideas suggestive of Taoism and Buddhism. In spite of its roots in ancient ethical theories, Flourishing Ethics is informed and grounded by recent scientific insights into the nature of living things, human nature and the fundamental nature of the universe – ideas from today’s information theory, astrophysics and genetics. Flourishing Ethics can be divided conveniently into two parts. The first part, which I call ‚Human-Centered FE,’ is focused exclusively upon human beings – their actions, values and characters. The second part, which I call ‚General FE,’ applies to every physical entity in the universe, including humans. Rather than replacing traditional ‚great ethical theories,’ Flourishing Ethics is likely to deepen and broaden our understanding of them.


Aristotelian ethics computer ethics cybernetics cyborg ethics entropy good and evil information ethics infosphere just consequentialism robot ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



An earlier version of this paper, entitled “A Copernican Revolution in Ethics?” was presented as the Georg Fredrik von Wright Ethics Address at E-CAP2005 (European Computers and Philosophy Conference 2005) at Mälardalen University in Sweden in June 2005. I am grateful to Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic and the Program Committee of E-CAP2005 for this opportunity. In addition I would like to thank the Connecticut State University for financial support. A later version, entitled “Flourishing Ethics”, was presented at the 2005 Uehiro/Carnegie Joint Conference “Information Ethics: Agents, Artifacts and New Cultural Perspectives” at Oxford University in December 2005. I am grateful to Julian Savulescu and Luciano Floridi for inviting me to the conference, and to the Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, and the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education for financial support. I am grateful for helpful discussions and suggestions from attendees at the two conferences and from colleagues in the Research Center on Computing & Society and the Philosophy Department at Southern Connecticut State University. In particular I wish to thank Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic, Charles Ess, Luciano Floridi, Krystyna Gorniak-Kocikowska, Fran Grodzinsky, Deborah Johnson, Walter Maner, James Moor, and Richard Volkman for their valuable comments. Remaining mistakes and shortcomings, of course, are my own.


  1. Aristotle. On the Movement of Animals; On the Soul; Nicomachean Ethics; and Eudemian Ethics Google Scholar
  2. B.H. Baumrin. Applying Philosophy. In T.W. Bynum and␣W. Vitek, editors, Applying Philosophy, pp. 1–10. Blackwell, 1988 (A monograph of the Metaphilosophy Foundation)Google Scholar
  3. J.D. Bekenstein. Information in the Holographic Universe. Scientific American, August 2003Google Scholar
  4. T.W. Bynum. Aristotle’s Theory of Human Action. UMI, 1986Google Scholar
  5. T.W. Bynum. The Foundation of Computer Ethics. Computers and Society, June 6–13, 2000Google Scholar
  6. T.W. Bynum. Ethical Challenges to Citizens of “The Automatic Age”: Norbert Wiener on the Information Society. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 2(2): 65–74, 2004Google Scholar
  7. T.W. Bynum. The Impact of the “Automatic Age” on Our Moral Lives. In R. Cavalier, editor, The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, pp. 11–25. State University of New York Press, 2005Google Scholar
  8. T.W. Bynum. Norbert Wiener and the Rise of Information Ethics. In W.J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert, editors,␣Moral Philosophy and Information Technology. Cambridge University Press, 2007 (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  9. K. Chang. Intelligent Beings in Space! New York Times, May 30, pp. F1, F4, 2006Google Scholar
  10. F. Conway and J. Siegelman. Dark Hero of the Information Age: In Search of Norbert Wiener, the Father of Cybernetics. Basic Books, 2005Google Scholar
  11. J.M. Cooper. Reason and Human Good in Aristotle. Harvard University Press, 1975Google Scholar
  12. Floridi L. (1999). Information Ethics: On the Theoretical Foundations of Computer Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 1.1:37–56Google Scholar
  13. L. Floridi. On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4): 287–304, 2003Google Scholar
  14. L. Floridi. Information Ethics: Its Nature and Scope. In W.J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert, editors, Moral Philosophy and Information Technology. Cambridge University Press, 2006Google Scholar
  15. L. Floridi. Global Information Ethics: The Importance of Being Environmentally Earnest (a forthcoming article)Google Scholar
  16. L. Floridi and J.W. Sanders. The Foundationalist Debate in Computer Ethics. In R.A. Spinello and H.T. Tavani, editors, Readings in CyberEthics, 2nd edition, pp. 81–95. Jones and Bartlett, 2004aGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Floridi and J.W. Sanders. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3): 349–379, 2004bGoogle Scholar
  18. B. Gert. Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press, 1998Google Scholar
  19. T.H. Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962Google Scholar
  20. S. Lloyd. Programming the Universe. Knopf, 2006Google Scholar
  21. W. Maner. Starter Kit on Teaching Computer Ethics. Helvetia Press, 1980 (originally self published in 1978)Google Scholar
  22. J. Markoff. Brainy Robots Start Stepping into Daily Life. New York Times, July 18, pp. A1, C4, 2006Google Scholar
  23. J.H. Moor. What Is Computer Ethics? In T.W. Bynum, editor, Computers and Ethics, pp. 263–275. Blackwell, 1985 [Published as the October 1985 special issue of Metaphilosophy.]Google Scholar
  24. Moor J.H. (1998). Reason, Relativity and Responsibility in Computer Ethics. Computers and Society 28:1Google Scholar
  25. Moor J.H. (1999). Just Consequentialism and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1: 65–69Google Scholar
  26. J.H. Moor. An Interview with James Moor. In M.J. Quinn, editor, Ethics for the Information Age, 2nd edition, pp.␣103–105. Addison Wesley, 2006Google Scholar
  27. G. Ryle. The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press, 1949Google Scholar
  28. J. Wheeler. Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. Westview, 1990Google Scholar
  29. N. Wiener. Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Technology Press, 1948Google Scholar
  30. N. Wiener. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Houghton Mifflin, 1950 (Second Edition Revised, Doubleday Anchor, 1954).Google Scholar
  31. N. Wiener. God & Golem, Inc. A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. MIT Press, 1964Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center on Computing & SocietySouthern Connecticut State UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations