Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 149–155

Artificial Morality: Top-down, Bottom-up, and Hybrid Approaches

Article

Abstract

A principal goal of the discipline of artificial morality is to design artificial agents to act as if they are moral agents. Intermediate goals of artificial morality are directed at building into AI systems sensitivity to the values, ethics, and legality of activities. The development of an effective foundation for the field of artificial morality involves exploring the technological and philosophical issues involved in making computers into explicit moral reasoners. The goal of this paper is to discuss strategies for implementing artificial morality and the differing criteria for success that are appropriate to different strategies.

Keywords

artificial morality autonomous agents ethics machines robots values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, C, Varner, G, Zinser, J 2000A Prolegomena to Any Future Artificial Moral AgentJournal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence12251261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R, Hamilton, W 1981The Evolution of CooperationScience21113901396MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Danielson, P 1992Artificial Morality: Virtuous Robots for Virtual GamesRoutledgeNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Danielson, P 1998Modeling Rationality, Morality and EvolutionOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Floridi, L 1999Information Ethics: On the Philosophical Foundation of Computer EthicsEthics and Information Technology13756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Floridi, L, Sanders, J. W. 2004On the Morality of Artificial AgentsMinds and Machines14349379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foerster, H 1992Ethics and Second-order CyberneticsCybernetics & Human Knowing1925Google Scholar
  8. Gips, J 1995

    Towards the Ethical Robot

    Ford, KGlymour, CHayes, P eds. Android EpistemologyMIT PressCambridge, MA243252
    Google Scholar
  9. Skyrms, B 1996Evolution of the Social ContractCambridge University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Turing, A 1950Computing Machinery and IntelligenceMind59433460MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. W. Wallach. Artificial Morality: Bounded Rationality, Bounded Morality and Emotions. In I. Smit, G. Lasker and W. Wallach, editors, Proceedings of the Intersymp 2004 Workshop on Cognitive, Emotive and Ethical Aspects of Decision Making in Humans and in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–6, Baden-Baden, Germany, IIAS, Windsor, Ontario, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Wilson, E.O 1975Sociobiology: The New SynthesisHarvard/BelknapCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.E&E ConsultantsNetterdenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Yale University Interdisciplinary Center for BioethicsNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations