Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 223–231 | Cite as

Digital Nominalism. Notes on the Ethics of Information Society in View of the Ontology of the Digital

Article

Abstract

The commodification of code demands two preconditions: a belief if the existence of code and a system of ownership for the code. An examination of these preconditions is helpful for resisting the further widening of digital divides. The ontological belief in the relatively independent existence of code is dependent on our understanding of what the “digital” is. Here it is claimed that the digital is not a natural kind, but a concept that is relative to our practices of interpretation. An interpretative system that sees code as something that can or should always be owned implies an increase of social control and threatens vital processes of knowledge creation that are necessary for an open and egalitarian information society. The ontological belief in “digital code” thus provides the backdrop for an ethical view of the information society. Consequently, if we see digital code as an interpretative notion (in the nominalist way), the ethical questions appear in a different light.

Keywords

digitalness digital divide disorganisations free software ICT information society intellectual property knowledge creation ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Block, N. 1980

    Introduction: What is Functionalism?

    Block, N. eds. Readings in Philosophy of PsychologyHarvard University PressCambridge, MA
    Google Scholar
  2. J. Derrida. Negotiations. Interventions and Interviews. (edited, translated and with an introduction by Elizabeth Rottenberg) Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. C. DiBona, S. Ockman and M.Stone, editors, Open Sources. Voices from the Open Source Revolution. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Drahos, P, Braithwaite, J 2002Information Feudalism. Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?EarthscanLondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, H 2001On the InternetRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Haugeland. Analog and Analog. In: Having Thought. Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Lash, S 2002Critique of InformationSAGELondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Lessig, L 2001The Future of Ideas. The Fate of the Commons in a Connected WorldRandom HouseNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Lessig. “Free culture” Presentation at the OSCON 2002 Conference. Available: http://randomfoo.net/oscon/2002/lessig/.
  10. Lessig, L 2004Free CultureThe Penguin PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Levy, D.M 2001Scrolling ForwardArcade PublishingNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Nonaka, I, Ikujiro, , Takeuchi, H 1995The Knowledge Creating CompanyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Raymond, E.S 2001The Cathedral and The BazaarO’ReillySebastobolGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Searle. Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 1980.Google Scholar
  15. Searle, J 1992The Rediscovery of the MindThe MIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. R. Stallman. Free Software, Free Society. Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Joshua Gay, editor. The GNU Press, Boston, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of mathematics, statistics and philosophyUniversity of TampereFinland

Personalised recommendations