Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 175–183 | Cite as

The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata

Article

Abstract

Traditionally, the manufacturer/operator of a machine is held (morally and legally) responsible for the consequences of its operation. Autonomous, learning machines, based on neural networks, genetic algorithms and agent architectures, create a new situation, where the manufacturer/operator of the machine is in principle not capable of predicting the future machine behaviour any more, and thus cannot be held morally responsible or liable for it. The society must decide between not using this kind of machine any more (which is not a realistic option), or facing a responsibility gap, which cannot be bridged by traditional concepts of responsibility ascription.

Keywords

artificial intelligence autonomous robots learning machines liability moral responsibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andriole, S.J., Hopple, G.W. 1992Applied Artificial Intelligence: A SourcebookMcGraw-HillNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. R.K. Belew, J. McInerney and N.N. Schraudolph. Evolving Networks: Using the Genetic Algorithm with Connectionist Learning. Cognitive Computer Science Research Group, Computer Science & Engineering Department (C-014), University of California at San Diego. CSE Technical Report #CS90–174, June, 1990. Google Scholar
  3. K.A. De Jong and A.C. Schultz. Using Experience-Based Learning in Game Playing. Proceedings of the Fifth International Machine Learning Conference, (pp. 284–290). Ann Arbor, Michigan, June 12–14, 1988Google Scholar
  4. Fischer, J.M.Ravizza, M.S.J. eds. 1998Responsibility and Control. A Theory of Moral ResponsibilityCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Holland, J. eds. 1975Adaptation in Natural and Artificial SystemsUniversity of Michigan PressAnn ArborGoogle Scholar
  6. G.S. Hornby, M. Fujita, S. Takamura and others. Autonomous Evolution of Gaits with the Sony Quadruped Robot. Group 1, D-21 Laboratory, Sony Corporation Ph: 81-3-5448-5901. Tokyo, Japan, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Llobet, E., Hines, E.L., Gardner, J.W., Franco, S. 1999Non-Destructive Banana Ripeness Determination Using a Neural Network-Based Electronic Nose.Measurement Science Technology10538548Google Scholar
  8. Moriarty, D.E., Schultz, A.C., Grefenstette, J.J. 1999Evolutionary Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research11199229Google Scholar
  9. J.C. Morrison and T.T. Nguyen. On-Board Software for the Mars Pathfinder Microrover. Jet Propulsion Laboratory report IAA-L-0504P, 1996Google Scholar
  10. S. Nolfi and D. Parisi. Growing Neural Networks. Institute of Psychology, National Research Council Technical Report PCIA-91-15, Rome, Italy, 1991. (Presented at Artificial Life III, Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 15–19, 1992.)Google Scholar
  11. Oshana, M.A.L. 2002The Misguided Marriage of Responsibility and Autonomy.The Journal of Ethics6261280Google Scholar
  12. OTIS Elevators. Redefining Elevator Performance, Safety and Comfort: The OTIS Elevonic Class. Product Description, 2003. Available: http://www.otis.comGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Sasaki, S. Markon and M. Makagawa. Elevator Group Supervisory Control System Using Neural Networks. Elevator World, 1, 1996Google Scholar
  14. Schindler Elevator Corporation AITP: Artificial Intelligence Traffic Processor. Technical Product Description, 2003. Available: http://www.us.schindler.comGoogle Scholar
  15. A.C. Schultz. Using a Genetic Algorithm to Learn Strategies for Collision Avoidance and Local Navigation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, (pp. 213–215). University of New Hampshire Marine Systems Engineering Laboratory, New Hampshire, September 23–25, 1991Google Scholar
  16. A.C. Schultz. Learning Robot Behaviors Using Genetic Algorithms. In. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotics and Manufacturing. Washington DC, August 14–18, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. S.B. Stancliff and M.C. Nechyba. Learning to Fly: Modeling Human Control Strategies in an Aerial Vehicle. Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, 2000. Available: http://www.mil.ufl.edu/publications.Google Scholar
  18. Stolzmann, W.Butz, M.V.Hoffmann, J.Goldberg, D.E. eds. 2000First Cognitive Capabilities in the Anticipatory Classifier SystemUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaIllinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory Report No. 2000008 Google Scholar
  19. P. Strawson. Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, p. 48 Britain, 1962.Google Scholar
  20. B.-T. Zhang and Y.-W. Seo. Personalized Web-Document Filtering Using Reinforcement Learning. AI Lab, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Korea, 2000. Available: http://www.scai. snu.ac.krGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou, Z.H., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y.B., Chen, S. F. 2002Lung Cancer Cell Identification Based on Artificial Neural Network Ensembles.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine242536Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computing CentreUniversity of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations