Labor Unions in the Trump Administration: Courts, Congress, and the National Labor Relations Board

  • 12 Accesses


In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump received crucial support from white male workers without college educations, many of whom were attached to labor unions. That demographic traditionally favored Democratic candidates in political contests. During his first two years in office, Trump enacted policies which primarily benefitted higher income earners and disadvantaged the middle class. The consequences of those policies, and the political appointees nominated to implement them, will have adverse consequences for labor enduring beyond Trump’s tenure in office.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.


  1. Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Education. (1977) 431 U.S. 209.

  2. Bivens, J. et al. (2018). Ten actions that hurt workers during Trump’s first year. Economic Policy Institute. Accessed 4 Sept 2019.

  3. Boudette, N. (2019). G.M. and U.A.W. reach deal that could end strike. New York Times. Accessed 18 Oct 2019.

  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Union members summary. Accessed Sept 19.

  5. Campbell, A. (2019). Government workers don’t have a federal right to unionize. Democrats want to change that. Vox. Accessed 5 Sept 2019.

  6. CBS News. (2019). Sara Nelson: the new face of labor. . Accessed 2 Sept 2019.

  7. Fink, G. (1998) Labor law revision and the end of the postwar labor accord. In Organized labor and American Politics, 1894-1994: The labor-liberal alliance. Albany: State University of New York. Pp. 239–258.

  8. Civil Rights Cases. (1883) 109 U.S. 3.

  9. Hatch, O. (2007). Remarks by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch before the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – “labor law reform -- yesterday v. today.” Vote Smart. Accessed 5 Sept 2019.

  10. Hogler, R. (2015). The end of American labor unions. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

  11. Hogler, R., Shulman, S., & Weiler, S. (2004). Right-to-work legislation, social capital, and variations in state union density. Review of Regional Studies, 34(1), 95–111 Accessed 28 Aug. 2019.

  12. Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Union. (2018) 585 U.S., 138 S. Ct. 2448.

  13. Johnson Controls, Inc. (2019). 368 NLRB No. 20.

  14. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937). 301 U.S. 1.

  15. Kurtzleben, D. (2016). How trump won, according to the exit polls. NPR Radio. Accessed 1 Oct 2019.

  16. Leonhardt, D. (2018). For wages, a trump slump. New York Times. Accessed 2 Sept 2019.

  17. Long, H. (2018). In U.S., wage growth is being wiped out entirely by inflation. Washington Post. Aug. 10. Retrieved 20 July 2019.

  18. Madland, D. & Rowell, A. (2018). Combating pay gaps with unions and expanded collective bargaining. Center for American Progress Action Fund. Retrieved 2 Aug 2019.

  19. Mehta, S. (2019). Beers, nostalgia and worry in Michigan as historic GM plant closes. Los Angeles Times. July 28. Accessed 28 Aug 2019.

  20. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  21. Pomfret, J. (1964). Labor maps fight on Taft-Hartley; plans to push for repeal of “right-to-work” section. New York Times. Nov. 25. Accessed 15 Oct. 2019.

  22. Public Service Freedom to Negotiate Act. (2019) H.R. 3463.

  23. Reyes, J. (2019). Philly airport workers are being forced to sign away their rights to take their employer to court. Philadelphia Inquirer. Sept. 17. Accessed Sept 30 2019.

  24. Saad, L. (2018). Labor union approval steady at 15-year high. Gallup. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.

  25. Sanders, B. (2019). The workplace democracy plan. Accessed 9 Oct 2019.

  26. SuperShuttle DFW, Inc. (2019). 367 NLRB No. 75.

  27. Thibodeau, I. (2019). GM strike, day 24: Talks resume after downbeat note from UAW. Detroit News. Oct. 9. Accessed 9 Oct 2019.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Raymond L. Hogler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by either of the authors.

Informed consent

There were no individual participants in this study and, thus, informed consent does not apply to this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hogler, R.L. Labor Unions in the Trump Administration: Courts, Congress, and the National Labor Relations Board. Employ Respons Rights J (2020).

Download citation


  • Labor unions
  • Public policy
  • Collective bargaining
  • National Labor Relations Board