Good Intentions? Employer Representative Conceptualizations and, Challenges to the Workplace Accommodation Process: The Case of Electrical Injuries

  • Mary Stergiou-Kita
  • Elizabeth Mansfield
  • Liane Daiter
  • Angela Colantonio
Article

Abstract

Returning to work following an electrical injury can be challenging due to the confluence of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial impairments that may arise. Workplace accommodations aim to facilitate return to work and workers’ participation in the workplace. To date, there has been no qualitative study of workplace accommodations following electrical injuries or any in-depth examination of how employers conceptualize and implement workplace accommodations. This study examines workplace accommodations for individuals who suffered electrical injuries at the workplace from employer representative perspectives. Ten in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with twelve employer representatives who work within the electrical sector in Ontario, Canada. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes related to the identification, provision and implementation of accommodations. Findings are discussed in relation to five themes: i) employers’ beliefs related to returning injured workers to work; ii) employers’ conceptualizations of accommodations and the types of accommodations provided; iii) knowledge and process elements relevant to the provision and implementation of workplace accommodations; iv) challenges to the accommodation process; and v) supports that employers drew upon to facilitate the identification and provision of accommodations. Recommendations are provided for enhancing knowledge regarding electrical injuries, human rights policies related to workplace accommodations, examining challenges related to privacy and discrimination and enhanced supports for employers to facilitate the provision of accommodations.

Keywords

Return to work Workplace Workplace accommodations Employers Human Rights Workers’ Compensation 

References

  1. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, S.O. 2005, c. 11, s. 1. Retrieved from the ServiceOntario e-Laws website: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_05a11_e.htm
  2. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended, 42 U.S.C., c. 126, § 12101et seq. (ADA) (2009). Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm
  3. Amick, B. C., III, Habeck, R. V., Hunt, A., Fossel, A. H., Chapin, A., Keller, R. B., et al. (2000). Measuring the impact of organizational behaviours on work disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anttonen, H., & Vainio, H. (2010). Towards better work and well-being an overview. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 52(12), 1245–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Journal of Medicine, 322, 1115-1117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294
  6. Baril, R., Clarke, J., Friesen, M., Stock, S., Cole, D., & the Work-Ready group. (2003). Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Social Science & Medicine, 57(11), 2104–2014.Google Scholar
  7. Barnett L., Nicol, J., & Walker, J. (2012). An examination of the duty to accommodate in the Canadian Human Rights Context. (Publication No. 2012-01-E). Retrieved from the Government of Canada Library of Parliament website: http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/2012-01-e.pdf
  8. Boden, L. I. (2012). Re-examining workers’ compensation: a human rights perspective. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(6), 483–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, M. P., Derrett, S., & Colhoun, S. (2011). The lived experience of patients with uncertain medical diagnosis following serious injury: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(23–24), 2247–2254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Part 1 of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.), 1982, c. 11. Retrieved from the Government of Canada Justice Laws website: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html
  12. Canadian Human Rights Act, Revised Statutes of Canada (1985, c. H-6). Retrieved from the Department of Justice Canada website: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/h-6/page-1.html
  13. Chan, F., Strauser, D., Gervey, R., & Lee, E.-J. (2010). Introduction to demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clougerty, J. E., Souza, K., & Cullen, M. R. (2010). Work and its role in shaping the social gradient in health. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 1186(1), 102–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/
  16. Copeland, J., Chan, F., Bezyak, J., & Fraser, R. T. (2010). Assessing cognitive and affective reactions of employers toward people with disabilities in the workplace. Journal Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corrigan, P. W., Kuwabara, S., Tsang, H., Shi, K., Larson, J., Lam, C. S., et al. (2008). Disability and work-related attitudes in employers from Beijing, Chicago and Hong Kong. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31(4), 347–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowler, D. L., Solovieva, T. I., & Walls, R. T. (2011). Personal assistance services at the workplace: a literature review. Disability and Health Journal, 4(4), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eakin, J. M., MacEachen, E., & Clarke, J. (2003). ‘Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 1(2), 19–41.Google Scholar
  20. Electrical Safety Authority. (2011). Safety report (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.esasafe.com/assets/files/esasafe/pdf/Safety_Reports/2011/ESA-OESR-2011-All-FA-singles.pdf
  21. Employment Equity Act, S. C. (1995, c. 44). Retrieved from the government of Canada justice laws website: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-5.401/
  22. Equality Act 2010. c. 15. Retrieved from the UK National Archives website: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
  23. Franche, R. L., Baril, R., Shaw, W., Nicholas, M., & Loisel, P. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franche, R. L., Severin, C., Hogg-Johnson, S., Lee, H., Cote, P., & Krause, N. (2009). A multivariate analysis of factors associated with early offer and acceptance of a work accommodation following an occupational musculoskeletal injury. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51(8), 969–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friesen, M. N., Yassi, A., & Cooper, J. (2001). Return-to-work: The importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work, 17(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
  26. Gold, P. B., Oire, S. N., Fabian, E. S., & Wewiorski, N. J. (2012). Negotiating reasonable accommodations: perspectives of employers, employees with disabilities and rehabilitation service providers. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37(1), 25–37.Google Scholar
  27. Gross, D. P., Battie, M. C., & Cassidy, J. D. (2004). The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine, 29(8), 914–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hartnett, H. P., Stuart, H., Thurman, H., Loy, B., & Batiste, L. C. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the benefits of workplace accommodations: reasons to hire, retain and promote people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
  29. Heilbronner, R. L., & Pliskin, N. H. (1999). Psychological issues in the neurorehabilitation of electrical injuries. NeuroRehabilitation, 13(2), 127–132.Google Scholar
  30. Henderson, C., Williams, P., Little, K., & Thornicroft, G. (2013). Mental health problems in the workplace: changes in employers’ knowledge, attitudes and practices in England 2006-2010. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 55, s70–s76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilgert, J. A. (2012). Building a human rights framework for workers’ compensation in the United States: Opening the debate on first principles. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(6), 506–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoefsmit, N., de Rijk, A., & Houkes, I. (2013). Work resumption at the price of distrust: a qualitative study on return to work legislation in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 13, 153. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang, Y.-H., Pransky, G. S., Shaw, W. S., Benjamin, K. L., & Savageau, J. A. (2006). Factors affecting organizational responses of employers to workers with injuries. Work, 26(1), 75–84.Google Scholar
  34. Jacoby, A., Gorry, J., & Baker, G. A. (2005). Employers’ attitudes to employment of people with epilepsy: still the same old story? Epilepsia, 46(12), 1978–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jafari, H., Couratier, P., & Camu, W. (2001). Motor neuron disease after electric injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 71(2), 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larsson, A., & Gard, G. (2003). How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 13(3), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative research methods (3rd ed.). South Melbourne, AUS: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lippel, K. (2012). Preserving workers’ dignity in workers’ compensation systems: an international perspective. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(6), 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Loisel, P., Buchbinder, R., Hazard, R., Keller, R., van Scheel, L., Tulder, M., et al. (2005). Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 507–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lund, T., Labriola, M., Christensen, K., Bultmann, U., & Villadsen, E. (2006). Return to work among sickness-absent danish employees: prospective results from the danish work environment cohort study/national register on social transfer payments. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 29(3), 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lysaght, R., Fabriger, L., Larmour-Trode, S., Stewart, J., & Friesen, M. (2012). Measuring workplace social support for workers with disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(3), 376–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacEachen, E., Ferrier, S., Kosny, A., & Chambers, L. (2007). A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy and practice in health and safety, 5(2), 41–62.Google Scholar
  43. Mansfield, L., MacEachen, E., Tompa, E., Kalcevich, C., Endicott, M., & Yeung, N. (2012). A critical review of literature on experience rating in workers’ compensation systems. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 1, 3–25.Google Scholar
  44. Mikkonen, J., & Raphael, D. (2010). Social determinants of health: The Canadian facts. Toronto, ON: York University School of Health Policy and Management.Google Scholar
  45. Moon, N. W., & Baker, P. M. A. (2012). Assessing stakeholder perceptions of workplace accommodation barriers: Results from a policy research instrument. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(2), 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien, R. (2005). Other voices at the workplace: gender, disability, and an alternative ethic of care. Signs, 30(2), 1529–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), Revised Statutes of Canada (1990, c. 0.1). Retrieved from the ServiceOntario e-Laws website: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90o01_e.htm
  48. Office of the Employer Adviser. (2013). The employer’s guide to workplace safety and insurance. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.employeradviser.ca/en/.Google Scholar
  49. Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2006). Qualitative research in health care (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Popovich, P. M., Scherbaum, C. A., Scherbaum, K. L., & Polinko, N. (2003). The assessment of attitudes towards individuals with disabilities in the workplace. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137(2), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pothier, D. (2010). Tackling disability discrimination at work: toward a systemic approach. McGill Journal of Law & Health, 4, 17–37.Google Scholar
  52. Pransky, G. S., & Dempsey, P. G. (2004). Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14(3), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Primeau, M. (2005). Neurorehabilitation of behavioural disorders following lightning and electrical trauma. NeuroRehabilitation, 20(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  54. Raphael, D. (2006). Social determinants of health: present status, unresolved questions and future directions. International Journal of Health Services, 36(4), 651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts-Yates, D. C. (2006). Employers’ perceptions of claims/injury management and rehabilitation in South Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 102–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson, C. J. (1999). Using engineering and assistive technologies for rehabilitation after electrical trauma. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 888, 317–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanford, J., & Milchus, K. (2006). Evidence-based practice in workplace accommodations. Work, 27(4), 329–332.Google Scholar
  58. Secker, J., & Membrey, H. (2003). Promoting mental health through employment and developing healthy workplaces: the potential of natural supports at work. Health Education Research, 18(2), 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shaw, W. S., & Feuerstein, M. (2004). Generating workplace accommodations: lessons learned from the integrated case management study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 14(3), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shaw, L., & Lindsay, R. (2008). Renewing focus and building capacity for enacting authentic collaboration in work rehabilitation. Work, 30(3), 215–218.Google Scholar
  61. Shaw, W. S., Kristman, V. L., & Vezina, N. (2012). Workplace issues. In P. Loisel & J. R. Anema (Eds.), Handbook of work disability: prevention and management (pp. 163–182). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Solovieva, T. I., Walls, R. T., Hendricks, D. J., & Dowler, D. L. (2009). Cost of workplace accommodations for individuals with disabilities: with or without personal assistance services. Disability and Health Journal, 2(4), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Solovieva, T. I., Dowler, D. L., & Walls, R. T. (2011). Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations. Disability and Health Journal, 4(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spataro, S. E. (2005). Diversity in context: how organizational culture shapes reactions to workers with disabilities and others who are demographically different. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stahl, C., Svensson, T., Petersson, G., & Ekberg, K. (2010). A matter of trust? A study of coordination of Swedish stakeholders in return-to-work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(3), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stahl, C., MacEachen, E., & Lippel, K. (2014). Ethical perspectives in work disability prevention and return to work: Toward a common vocabulary for analyzing stakeholders’ actions and interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 237–250. doi:10.1007/s105551-013-1661-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Steenstra, I., Verbeek, J., Heymans, M., & Bongers, P. (2005). Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(12), 851–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stergiou-Kita, M., Rappolt, S., Kirsh, B., & Shaw, L. (2009). Evaluating work readiness following acquired brain injury: building a shared understanding. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(4), 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stergiou-Kita, M., Mansfield, E., & Colantonio, A. (2013). Injured workers’ perspectives on how workplace accommodations are conceptualized and delivered following electrical injuries. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, E-pub ahead of print.. doi:10.1007/s10926-013-9463-8.Google Scholar
  70. Stoddard, S. (2006). Personal assistance services as a workplace accommodation. Work, 27(4), 363–369.Google Scholar
  71. Stuart, H. (2007). Employment equity and mental disability. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(5), 486–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Theman, K., Singerman, J., Gomez, M., & Fish, J. (2008). Return to work after low voltage electrical injury. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 29(6), 969–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tucker, E. (2003). Diverging trends in worker health and safety protection and participation in Canada, 1985-2000. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 58(3), 395–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. UN General Assembly. (2007). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: resolution/adopted by the General Assembly, 24, January 2007, A/RES/61/106. Retrieved from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/45f973632.html
  75. Wang, J., Patten, S., Currie, S., Sareen, J., & Schmitz, N. (2011). Perceived needs for and use of workplace accommodations by individuals with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(11), 1268–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ward, A., Moon, N., & Baker, P. M. A. (2012). Functioning, capabilities and freedom: a framework for understanding work disability. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams, M., Sabata, D., & Zolna, J. (2006). User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations. Work, 27(4), 355–362.Google Scholar
  78. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA), S.O. 1997, c. 16, Schedule A, §159 et seq. Retrieved from the ServiceOntario e-Laws website: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_97w16_e.htm#BK200
  79. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Benefits and Revenue Policy Branch. (2006). Early and safe return to work policy consultation report. Toronto, ON: Workplace Safety and Insurance BoardGoogle Scholar
  80. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Benefits and Revenue Policy Branch. (2007). Early and safe return to work policy consultation report-second round. Retrieved from http://www.injuredworkersonline.org/Documents/ESRTWPolicyConsultation2Report.pdf
  81. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2011). Overview of Workers’ Compensation in Ontario 1980 to present. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board. Retrieved from http://www.wsib.on.ca/files/Content/FundingReviewFROverviewWorkersComp/OverviewWorkersCompensation.pdf
  82. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2012). Work transition plans. Document No. 19-03-05. Ontario, Canada. http://www.wsib.on.ca/ Viewed July 2013
  83. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2013a). By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report. Schedule 1. Retrieved from http://www.wsibstatistics.ca/
  84. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). (2013b). By the numbers: 2012 WSIB statistical report. Schedule 2. http://www.wsibstatistics.ca/
  85. Yarnell, P. (2005). Neurorehabilitation of cerebral disorders following lighting and electrical trauma. NeuroRehabilitation, 20(1), 15–18.Google Scholar
  86. Young, A. E. (2013). Return to work stakeholders’ perspectives on work disability. In P. Loisel & J. R. Anema (Eds.), Handbook of Work Disability (pp. 409–423). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Young, A. E., Wasiak, R., Roessler, R. T., McPherson, K. M., Anema, J. R., & van Poppel, M. N. (2005). Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Stergiou-Kita
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Mansfield
    • 2
  • Liane Daiter
    • 3
  • Angela Colantonio
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Occupational Science and OccupationalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy MSc OT CandidateUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations