Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 295–310 | Cite as

How Do Social Networks Influence the Employment Prospects of People with Disabilities?

  • Christopher R. Langford
  • Mark L. Lengnick-Hall
  • Mukta Kulkarni
Article

Abstract

We explore the role of social networks used by people with disabilities for finding employment. In addition, we outline obstacles to network building for those with a disability. We contend that this group is often constrained and they underutilize their networks during job searches. Both factors are likely to result in negative employment outcomes and contribute to the employment gap between those with and without a disability. We outline how key network characteristics such as homophily, tie strength, and centrality influence job search outcomes for those with a disability differently than for those without a disability. Furthermore, we propose that although individuals with disabilities develop and rely upon networks that are comprised of close bonds with similar individuals that are either unemployed or underemployed in lower status positions, optimal networks for employment purposes should consist of diverse acquaintances that occupy central positions and higher status jobs within organizations. Finally, we outline propositions to guide future research on this neglected topic and also suggest practical implications.

Key Words

Disability Job search Social networks Diversity Human resources 

References

  1. Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: can requesters’ beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Academy of Management Review, 26, 85–99.Google Scholar
  2. Boyle, M. A. (1997). Social barriers to successful reentry into mainstream organizational culture: perceptions of people with disabilities. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: a study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brault, M. (2008). Americans with disabilities: 2005, current population reports (pp. 70–117). Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  7. Bryen, D. N., Potts, B. B., & Carey, A. C. (2007). So you want to work? What employees say about job skills, recruitment and hiring employees who rely on AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkhauser, R. V., & Stapleton, D. C. (2004). The decline in the employment rate for people with disabilities: bad data, bad health, or bad policy? Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 185–201.Google Scholar
  9. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Carey, A. C., Potts, B. B., Bryen, D. N., & Shankar, J. (2004). Experiences of people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 40–52.Google Scholar
  12. Chatman, J., O’Reilly, C., & Chang, V. (2005). Cisco systems: developing a human capital strategy. California Management Review, 47, 137–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comer, R. J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interactions: the other side. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeLeire, T. (2000). The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources, 35, 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fairchild, G. B., & Robinson, J. A. (2004). It’s what you know and who they know: weak ties and strong ties in urban labor markets. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper GDO, G1–G6.Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez, R. M., Castilla, E. J., & Moore, P. (2000). Social capital at work: networks and employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1288–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frable, D., Platt, L., & Hoey, S. (1998). Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: feeling better around similar others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 909–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 79, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holzer, H. J. (1987). Informal job search and black youth unemployment. American Economic Review, 77, 446–452.Google Scholar
  24. Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar
  25. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Kleck, R. (1969). Physical stigma and task oriented interactions. Human Relations, 22, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kleck, R., Ono, H., & Hastorf, A. H. (1966). The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interactions. Human Relations, 19, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harward Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kulkarni, M., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Socialization of people with disabilities in the workplace. Human Resource Management, 50, 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kulkarni, M., & Valk, R. (2010). Don’t ask, don’t tell: two views on human resource practices for people with disabilities. IIMB Management Review, 22, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2007). Hidden talent: How companies hire, retain, and benefit from people with disabilities. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Gaunt, P. M. (2007). Why employers don’t hire people with disabilities. In M. L. Lengnick-Hall (Ed.), Hidden talent: How companies hire, retain, and benefit from people with disabilities (pp. 25–33). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  33. Lengnick-Hall, M. L., Gaunt, P. M., & Kulkarni, M. (2008). Overlooked and underutilized: people with disabilities are an untapped human resource. Human Resource Management, 47, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin, N., Ensel, W., & Vaughn, J. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lincoln, R., Jr., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: a comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marsden, P. V. (1988). Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks, 10, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGuire, W. J. (1984). Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 73–120). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  39. Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: a distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mollica, K. A., Gray, B., & Trevino, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomwers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montgomery, J. D. (1991). Social networks and labor market outcomes: toward an economic analysis. The American Economic Review, 81, 1408–1418.Google Scholar
  42. Montgomery, J. D. (1992). Job search and network composition: implications of the strength-of-weak ties hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 57, 586–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Potts, B. (2005). Disability and employment: considering the importance of social capital. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 20–35.Google Scholar
  44. Ravaud, J., Madiot, B., & Ville, I. (1992). Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Social Science & Medicine, 35, 951–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rees, A. (1966). Information networks in labor markets. American Economic Review, 56, 559–566.Google Scholar
  46. Reid, G. L. (1972). Job search and the effectiveness of job-finding methods. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 25, 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ruef, M. (2003). A sociological perspective on strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 1, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheid, T. L. (1998). The Americans with Disabilities Act, mental disability, and employment practices. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 25, 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shore, L. M., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., Jung, D. I., Randel, A. E., et al. (2009). Diversity in organizations: where are we now and where are we going? Human Resource Management Review, 19, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and inter-group interaction: men and women in the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stoloff, J. A., Glanville, J. L., & Bienenstock, E. J. (1999). Women’s participation in the labor force: the role of social networks. Social Networks, 21, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21, 352–401.Google Scholar
  54. Stone, C. I., & Sawatzki, B. (1980). Hiring bias and the disabled interviewee: effects of manipulating work history and disability information of the disabled job applicant. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stone, D. L., & Williams, K. J. (1997). The impact of ADA on the selection process: applicant and organizational issues. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 203–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: the importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. United Nations Factsheet on Persons with Disability (2009). Accessed December 13, 2010, from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=18.
  59. Wanous, J. (1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading: Addisson-Wesley.Google Scholar
  60. Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Wertlieb, E. C. (1985). Minority group status of the disabled. Human Relations, 38, 1047–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Westmorland, M. G., & Williams, R. (2002). Employers and policy makers can make a difference to the employment of persons with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24, 802–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. World Health Organization (2011). Health Topics: Disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/.
  64. Zernitsky-Shurka, E. (1988). Ingroup and outgroup evaluation by disabled individuals. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher R. Langford
    • 1
  • Mark L. Lengnick-Hall
    • 1
  • Mukta Kulkarni
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management BangaloreBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations