How Do Social Networks Influence the Employment Prospects of People with Disabilities?
- First Online:
- 474 Downloads
We explore the role of social networks used by people with disabilities for finding employment. In addition, we outline obstacles to network building for those with a disability. We contend that this group is often constrained and they underutilize their networks during job searches. Both factors are likely to result in negative employment outcomes and contribute to the employment gap between those with and without a disability. We outline how key network characteristics such as homophily, tie strength, and centrality influence job search outcomes for those with a disability differently than for those without a disability. Furthermore, we propose that although individuals with disabilities develop and rely upon networks that are comprised of close bonds with similar individuals that are either unemployed or underemployed in lower status positions, optimal networks for employment purposes should consist of diverse acquaintances that occupy central positions and higher status jobs within organizations. Finally, we outline propositions to guide future research on this neglected topic and also suggest practical implications.
Key WordsDisability Job search Social networks Diversity Human resources
- Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: can requesters’ beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Academy of Management Review, 26, 85–99.Google Scholar
- Brault, M. (2008). Americans with disabilities: 2005, current population reports (pp. 70–117). Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
- Burkhauser, R. V., & Stapleton, D. C. (2004). The decline in the employment rate for people with disabilities: bad data, bad health, or bad policy? Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 185–201.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Carey, A. C., Potts, B. B., Bryen, D. N., & Shankar, J. (2004). Experiences of people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 40–52.Google Scholar
- Fairchild, G. B., & Robinson, J. A. (2004). It’s what you know and who they know: weak ties and strong ties in urban labor markets. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper GDO, G1–G6.Google Scholar
- Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Holzer, H. J. (1987). Informal job search and black youth unemployment. American Economic Review, 77, 446–452.Google Scholar
- Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: a conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56–87.Google Scholar
- Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structures, form and action (pp. 216–239). Boston: Harward Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2007). Hidden talent: How companies hire, retain, and benefit from people with disabilities. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Gaunt, P. M. (2007). Why employers don’t hire people with disabilities. In M. L. Lengnick-Hall (Ed.), Hidden talent: How companies hire, retain, and benefit from people with disabilities (pp. 25–33). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
- McGuire, W. J. (1984). Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 73–120). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
- Montgomery, J. D. (1991). Social networks and labor market outcomes: toward an economic analysis. The American Economic Review, 81, 1408–1418.Google Scholar
- Potts, B. (2005). Disability and employment: considering the importance of social capital. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 20–35.Google Scholar
- Rees, A. (1966). Information networks in labor markets. American Economic Review, 56, 559–566.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996). A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 21, 352–401.Google Scholar
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Factsheet on Persons with Disability (2009). Accessed December 13, 2010, from: http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=18.
- Wanous, J. (1980). Organizational entry: Recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers. Reading: Addisson-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J. (1994). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (2011). Health Topics: Disabilities. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/topics/disabilities/en/.