Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 361–369 | Cite as

Human Resource Responsibilities: Frequent Flyer Radiation Exposure

Article

Abstract

At the high altitudes that are the domain of commercial airliners, passengers are exposed to cosmic radiation at an intensity that is hundreds of times greater than at ground level. Such radiation exposure represents a risk for individuals who fly frequently as part of their job. Business travelers who fly at least 85,000 miles (137,000 km) per year are likely to receive radiation exposures that exceed the regulatory limit established for members of the general public exposed by proximity to medical or industrial radiation facilities. Their exposures will not, however, exceed the higher level allowed for radiation workers. Human resource managers need to identify those employees who fly frequently on company business or due to a company-initiated relocation (e.g., expatriate assignment), classify them as radiation workers, and ensure compliance with the regulatory requirements for providing risk education and exposure assessment for such workers. Failure to do so may incur potential liability for radiation-related health problems, particularly in the case of pregnant employees where the embryo or fetus is also at risk.

Key words

Occupational health Employee safety Radiation risk Human resource policies 

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2008). Cancer facts and figures 2008. Atlanta: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Barish, R. J. (1999). In-flight radiation: Counseling patients about risk. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 12, 195–199.Google Scholar
  3. Barish, R. J. (2004). In-flight radiation exposure during pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103, 1326–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barish, R. J. (2009). Health physics and aviation: Solar cycle 23 (1996–2008). Health Physics, 96, 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cascio, W. F. (2009). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  6. Copeland, K., Sauer, H. H., Duke, F. E., & Friedberg, W. (2008). Cosmic radiation exposure of aircraft occupants on simulated high-latitude flights during solar proton events from 1 January 1986 through 1 January 2008. Advances in Space Research, 42, 1008–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (1987). Radiation protection guidance to Federal agencies for occupational exposure. Federal Register, 52, 2822–2834.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2009). Radiation Protection No. 156: Evaluation of the implementation of radiation protection measures for aircrew. Luxemburg: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Federal Aviation Administration (1994). Crewmember training on in-flight radiation exposure (Advisory Circular 120-61). Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
  10. Friedberg, W., & Copeland, K. (2003). What aircrews should know about their occupational exposure to ionizing radiation (Report DOT/FAA/AM-03/16). Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
  11. Friedberg, W., Copeland, K., Duke, F. E., O’Brien, K., 3rd, & Darden, E. B., Jr. (1999). Guidelines and technical information provided by the US Federal Aviation Administration to promote radiation safety for air carrier crew members. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 86, 323–327.Google Scholar
  12. Friedberg, W., Copeland, K., Duke, F. E., Nicholas, J. S., Darden, E. B., Jr., & O’Brien, K., 3rd. (2002). Radiation exposure of aircrews. Occupational Medicine, 17, 293–309.Google Scholar
  13. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007). The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103). Annals of the ICRP, 37.Google Scholar
  14. Nakamura, T., Uwamino, Y., Ohkubo, T., & Hara, A. (1987). Altitude variation of cosmic-ray neutrons. Health Physics, 53, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1971). Basic radiation protection criteria (NCRP Report No. 39). Bethesda: Author.Google Scholar
  16. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1993). Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation (NCRP Report No. 116). Bethesda: Author.Google Scholar
  17. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2009). Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States (NCRP Report No. 160). Bethesda: Author.Google Scholar
  18. National Research Council (1984). Assigned share for radiation as a cause of cancer. Washington: National Academy.Google Scholar
  19. O’Brien, K., 3rd, Smart, D. F., Shea, M. A., Felsenberger, E., Schrewe, U., Friedberg, W., et al. (2003). World-wide radiation dosage calculations for air crew members. Advances in Space Research, 31, 835–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (1970). Occupational Safety and Health Act. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  21. United States Code of Federal Rules and Regulations (1991, May 31). Title 10, Chapter 1, Part 20, Section 20.1301. Standards for protection against radiation.Google Scholar
  22. U.S. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (2009). Birth defects. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/bd/default.htm.
  23. Wyatt, E. (1999, May 23). On my... calendar: J. Mark Mobius. New York Times, p. B2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management, Zicklin School of Business, Baruch CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations