Interpersonal Targets and Types of Workplace Aggression as a Function of Perpetrator Sex
- 219 Downloads
We investigated the relationship between biological sex of the perpetrator and enactment of two forms of psychological workplace aggression (i.e., overt and covert) against two different interpersonal targets (i.e., supervisors and co-workers). Based on theories of power, we tested hypotheses using two samples (n 1 = 155, 57% females; n 2 = 152, 54% females). In comparison to women, results showed that men enacted greater levels of overt aggression against both supervisors and co-workers. Men and women reported enacting equal levels of covert aggression against both supervisors and co-workers. Taken together, these findings suggest that although biological sex of the perpetrator distinguishes levels of enacted overt aggression in the workplace, there are no differences between the sexes on levels of enacted covert aggression in the workplace.
Key wordsdanger ratio power sex differences status workplace aggression
Earlier versions of this study were presented at the 2006 meeting of the International Congress of Applied Psychology, Athens, Greece, and the 2009 New Directions in Health Research: Sex & Gender Conference, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. Authors are listed in alphabetical order by surname, and all acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
- Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggression—the iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence on its forms, frequency, and potential causes. Public Administration Quarterly, 21, 446–464.Google Scholar
- Clark H (2010) The female factor: Getting women into boardrooms, by law. The New York Times, January 28.Google Scholar
- Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2006). Preventing workplace violence. In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling, J. Hurrell (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence, (pp. 607–632). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Korabik, K., & Ayman, R. (2007). Gender and leadership in the corporate world: A multiperspective model. In J. L. Chin, B. Lott, J. K. Rice, & J. Sanchez-Hucles (Eds.), Women and leadership: Transforming visions and diverse voices (pp. 106–124). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391–420.Google Scholar
- Powell, G. N., & Graves, L. M. (2003). Women and men in management. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Underwood, M. K. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar