Advertisement

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 213–229 | Cite as

“The Worse You Behave, The More You Seem, to be Rewarded”: Bullying in Nursing as Organizational Corruption

  • Marie HutchinsonEmail author
  • Margaret H. Vickers
  • Lesley Wilkes
  • Debra Jackson
Article

Abstract

This paper reports findings from the first, qualitative stage of a national sequential, mixed method study of bullying in the Australian nursing workplace. Twenty-six nurses who had experience of workplace bullying were recruited from two Australian public sector health care organizations. Examining the narrative data from the viewpoint of bullying being a corrupt activity we present an alternative perspective on group acts of bullying. By exploring bullying as corrupt behaviour, this paper challenges the assumption that bullying can be principally considered a series of isolated events stemming from interpersonal conflict, organizational pressures, or poor work design. Corruption in organizations has not previously been linked with or compared to bullying. In revealing the manner in which actors can engage in corrupt conduct that includes bullying, the findings from our study offer important implications for the management of workplace bullying as a serious and corrupt activity.

Key words

bullying mobbing corruption organizational behavior workplace violence 

References

  1. Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehavior. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Afsana, K. (2004). The tremendous cost of seeking hospital obstetric care in Bangladesh. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption within organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Robinson, S. L., & Trevino, L. K. (2008). Re-viewing organizational corruption. The Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 670–684.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). The past, present and future of workplace deviance research. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 247–282, 2nd ed.). NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Skaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. The Academy Of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bukovansky, M. (2002). Corruption is bad: Normative dimensions of the anti-corruption movement. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, J. J., & Lai, C. C. (2002). Is the efficiency wage efficient? The social norm and organizational corruption. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chappell, D., & Di Martino, V. (2000). Violence at work (2nd ed.). International Labour Office: Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, W. J. (1987). Toward an integrated theory of white collar crime. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 406–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, W. J., & Ramos, L. L. (1998). Subcultures and deviant behaviour in the organizational context. In P. A. Bamburger, & W. J. Sonnestohl (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organisations: Deviance in and of organizations (pp. 3–31). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.Google Scholar
  13. Costello, B. (1997). On the logical adequacy of cultural deviance theories. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 402–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cresswell, J., Fetters, A., & Ivankova, N. (2004). Designing a mixed method study in primary care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, P., Francis, P., & Jupp, V. (1999). The features of invisible crimes. In P. Davies, P. Francis, & V. Jupp (Eds.), Invisible crimes: Their victims and their regulation (pp. 3–28). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  17. Deflem, M. (1995). Corruption, law, and justice: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowden, C., & Tellier, C. (2004). Predicting work-related stress in correctional officers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Einarsen, S. (1999). The nature and causes of bullying at work. International Journal of Manpower, 20(1/2), 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Einarsen, S. E., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2003). The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In S. E. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 3–30). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Ensor, T. (2004). Informal payments for health care in transition economies. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Faunces, T. A., & Bolsin, N. C. (2004). Three Australian whistleblowing sagas: Lessons for internal and external regulation. The Medical Journal of Australia, 181(1), 44–47.Google Scholar
  23. Frank, B., & Schulze, G. G. (2000). Does economics make citizens corrupt? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set. American Sociological Review, 50, 639–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25–56). Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Griffin, L. (2005). Watch out for whistleblowers. The Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 33(1), 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart, E., & Hazelgrove, J. (2001). Understanding the organizational context for adverse events in the health services: The role of cultural censorship. 10, 257–262.Google Scholar
  28. Herbert, S. (1998). Police subculture reconsidered. Criminology, 36, 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyneman, S. P. (2004). Education and corruption. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hindess, B. (2004). Corruption and democracy in Australia. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  31. Hubert, A. B., & van Veldhoven, M. (2001). Risk sectors for undesirable behavior and mobbing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2005). “I’m gonna do what I wanna do!”: Organizational change as a legitimized vehicle for bullies. Health Care Management Review, 30(4), 331–338.Google Scholar
  33. Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M. H., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2006a). Workplace bullying in nursing: Towards a more critical organizational perspective. Nursing Inquiry, 13(2), 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M. H., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2006b). “Like wolves in a pack”: Stories of predatory alliances of bullies in nursing. Journal of Management and Organization, 12(3), 235–251.Google Scholar
  35. Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2006c). They stand you in a corner; you are not to speak: Nurses tell of abusive indoctrination in work teams dominated by bullies. Contemporary Nurse, 21(2), 228–238.Google Scholar
  36. Hutchinson, M., Vickers, M., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2008). A new model of bullying in the nursing workplace: Organizational characteristics as critical antecedents. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(2), E 6–71.Google Scholar
  37. Ibarra, H. (1992). Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 164–188). Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ibrahim, J., & Majoor, J. (2002). Corruption in the health care system: The circumstantial evidence. Australian Health Review, 25(2), 20–26.Google Scholar
  39. Jackson, D. (2008). Editorial: What becomes of whistleblowers? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(10), 1261–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnstone, M. J. (2004). Quality, safety and scandal: Are we learning the hard way from events at Campbelltown and Camden hospitals? Australian Health Review, 28(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
  41. Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation (Preface and afterword 1993 to the 1977 edition). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  42. Kivimäkia, M., & Virtanen, M. (2003). Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(10), 779–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kriekebaum, H. (2008). Corruption as a moral issue. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002). Making corrupt deals: Contracting in the shadow of the law. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 48, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langbein, L., & Jorstad, C. (2004). Productivity in the workplace: Cops, culture, communication, and collusion. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 65–79.Google Scholar
  46. Lange, D. (2008). A multidimensional conceptualization of organizational corruption. The Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729.Google Scholar
  47. Leonard, F. (1985). Clique formation in a regional health planning agency. Human Relations, 38(9), 895–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Lindgreen, A. (2004). Corruption and unethical behavior: Report on a set of Danish guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luo, Y. (2002). Corruption and organization in Asian management systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2), 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marjit, S., & Shi, H. (1998). On controlling crime with corrupt officials. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCarthy, P., Sheehan, M., & Kearns, D. (Eds.) (1995). Managerial styles and their effects on employees health and well-being in organizations undergoing restructuring. Brisbane: School of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Faculty of Commerce and Administration, Griffith University. Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  54. McCormack, R. J. (1996). Police perceptions and the norming of institutional corruption. Policing and Society, 6, 239–246.Google Scholar
  55. McKay, R., Huberman Arnold, D., Fratzl, J., & Thomas, R. (2008). Workplace bullying in academia: A Canadian study. Journal Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 20(2), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miles, M., & Hubermann, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Misangyi, V. F., Weaver, G. R., & Elms, H. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 750–770.Google Scholar
  58. Nielsen, R. P. (2003). Corruption networks and implications for ethical corruption reform. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(2), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 288–308). Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  60. Olivier de Sardan, J. P. (1999). A moral economy of corruption in Africa? Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(1), 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Moore, M., Lynch, J., & Daeid, N. N. (2003). The rates and relative risks of workplace bullying in Ireland, a country of high economic growth. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 4(1), 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Phillips, N. (2003). Power and institutions. In R. Westwood, & S. Clegg (Eds.), Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organizational studies (pp. 201–231). Malden, USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  63. Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pitt, L. F., & Abratt, R. (1986). Corruption in business—are management attitudes right? Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reeves, M. (2000). Suppressed, forced out and fired: How successful women lose their jobs. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum.Google Scholar
  66. Reich, M. R. (2002). Reshaping the state from above, from within, from below: Implications for public health. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 1669–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robbins, P. (2000). The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography, 19, 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behaviour of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shields, M., & Wilkins, K. (2006). Findings from the 2005 national survey of the work and health of nurses. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada and Canadian Institute for Health Informatics.Google Scholar
  71. Simpson, R., & Cohen, C. (2004). Dangerous work: The gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender Work and Organization, 11(2), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sissener, T. K. (2001). Anthological perspectives on corruption. Bergen, Norway: Chr. Mechelsen Institute.Google Scholar
  73. Stevenson, K., Randle, J., & Grayling, I. (2006). Inter-group conflict in health care: UK students experiences of bullying and the need for organizational solutions. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Retrieved November 3rd, 2006 from www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic30/tpc30_5.htm.
  74. Vickers, M. H. (2006). Towards employee wellness: Rethinking bullying paradoxes and masks. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Waite, D. G., & Allen, D. (2003). Corruption and abuse of power in educational administration. The Urban Review, 35(4), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zapf, D., & Einarsen, S. (2003). Individual antecedents of bullying: Victims and perpetrators. In S. E. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. C. L. (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: International perspectives in research and practice (pp. 165–184). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Hutchinson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Margaret H. Vickers
    • 2
  • Lesley Wilkes
    • 3
  • Debra Jackson
    • 3
  1. 1.Family and Community Health Research Group, College of BusinessUniversity of Western SydneyBallinaAustralia
  2. 2.Family and Community Health Research Group, College of BusinessUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith South DCAustralia
  3. 3.Family and Community Health Research Group, School of Nursing, College of Health & ScienceUniversity of Western SydneyPenrith South DCAustralia

Personalised recommendations