Knowledge, the disciplines, and learning in the Digital Age

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) are now widely used in schools: However, despite predictions, they have not revolutionized teaching and learning. Why is this? Does it matter? Should we care? This paper outline seeks to answer such questions and why we should care. School ICTs are informed by a range of different, and often conflicting ideas, with the result that student work is often “digital busywork”. The article argues that if ICTS are to play a useful role in helping us to re-develop our schools for the Knowledge Age, we need to re-examine some of our old ideas about knowledge. In particular, we need to re-examine the place and purpose of the traditional disciplinary knowledge that is the basis of the current curriculum.

Keywords

Information and communication technology Knowledge Disciplines Curriculum 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beare H., Slaughter R. (1993) Education for the twenty-first century. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beare H. (2001) Creating the future school. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell D. (1973) The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bereiter C. (2002) Education and mind in the Knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigum C. (2003) The knowledge-producing school: Moving away from the work of finding educational problems for which computers are solutions. Computers in New Zealand Schools 15(2): 22–26Google Scholar
  6. Castells M. (2000) The rise of the network society (2nd ed). Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Champy J. (1995) Re-engineering management: The mandate for new leadership. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Drucker P. (1993) Post-capitalist society. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Gee J-P., Hull G., Lankshear C. (1996) The new work order: behind the language of the new capitalism. Allen and Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert J. (2005) Catching the knowledge wave?: The Knowledge Society and the future of education. NZCER Press, Wellington NZGoogle Scholar
  11. Handy C. (1989) The age of unreason. Business Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Handy C. (1994) The age of paradox. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvey D. (1990) The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Kress G. (2003) Literacy in the new media age. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Landes D. (1998) Homo faber, Homo sapiens: Knowledge, technology, growth and development. In: Neef D. (eds). The knowledge economy. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp. 53–73Google Scholar
  16. Lankshear C., Knobel M. (2003) New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Open University Press, Buckingham UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyotard J-F. (1984) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Neef D. (eds) (1998) The knowledge economy. Butterworth-Heinemann, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Peters M. (2001) National education policy constructions of the ‘knowledge economy’: towards a critique. Journal of Educational Enquiry 2 (1): 1–22Google Scholar
  20. Popper K. (1966) The open society and its enemies: Volume one—the spell of Plato. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Prichard C., Hull R., Chumer M., Willmott H. (eds) (2000) Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning. Macmillan Business, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Senge P. (1990) The fifth discipline: The art and practice of learning. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Senge P., Cambron-McCabe N., Lucas T., Smith B., Dutton J., Kleiner A. (2000) Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. Currency/Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Skilton-Silvester P. (2003) Less like a robot: a comparison of change in an inner-city school and a Fortune 500 company. American Educational Research Journal 40(1): 3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stehr N. (1994) Knowledge societies. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Touraine A. (1971) The post-industrial society: tomorrow’s social history—classes, conflicts and culture in the programmed society. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Toffler A. (1970) Future shock. Bodley Head, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New Zealand Council for Educational ResearchWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations