- 30 Downloads
There is an emerging skepticism about the existence of testimonial knowledge-how (Hawley in Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 41(4):387–404, 2010; Poston in Noûs 50(4):865–878, 2016; Carter and Pritchard in Philos Phenomenol Res 91(1):181–199, 2015a) (Hawley does not commit to the impossibility of testimonial knowledge-how. However, she questions whether apparent cases of testimonial knowledge-how will be genuinely testimonial). This is unsurprising since a number of influential approaches to knowledge-how struggle to accommodate testimonial knowledge-how. Nonetheless, this scepticism is misguided. This paper establishes that there are cases of easy testimonial knowledge-how. It is structured as follows: first, a case is presented in which an agent acquires knowledge-how simply by accepting a speaker’s testimony. Second, it is argued that this knowledge-how is genuinely testimonial. Next, Poston’s (2016) arguments against easy testimonial knowledge-how are considered and rejected. The implications of the argument differ for intellectualists and anti-intellectualists about knowledge-how. The intellectualist must reject widespread assumptions about the communicative preconditions for the acquisition of testimonial knowledge. The anti-intellectualist must find a way of accommodating the dependence of knowledge-how on speaker reliability. It is not clear how this can be done.
- Carter, J. A., & Pritchard, D. (2015b). Knowledge how and epistemic luck. Noûs, 91(1), 181–199.Google Scholar
- Cath, Y. (2011). Knowing how without knowing that. In J. Bengson & M. A. Moffett (Eds.), Knowing how: Essays on knowledge, mind, and action (pp. 113–135). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Owens, D. (2017). Human testimony. In: D. Owens (Eds.), Normativity and control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Welbourne, M. (1986). The community of knowledge. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar