pp 1–26 | Cite as

Cognition and the Web: Extended, Transactive, or Scaffolded?

  • Richard HeersminkEmail author
  • John Sutton
Original Research


In the history of external information systems, the World Wide Web presents a significant change in terms of the accessibility and amount of available information. Constant access to various kinds of online information has consequences for the way we think, act and remember. Philosophers and cognitive scientists have recently started to examine the interactions between the human mind and the Web, mainly focussing on the way online information influences our biological memory systems. In this article, we use concepts from the extended cognition and distributed cognition frameworks and from transactive memory theory to analyse the cognitive relations between humans and the Web. We first argue that while neither of these approaches neatly capture the nature of human-Web interactions, both offer useful concepts to describe aspects of such interactions. We then conceptualize relations between the Web and its users in terms of cognitive integration, arguing that most current Web applications are not deeply integrated and are better seen as a scaffold for memory and cognition. Some highly personalised applications accessed on wearable computing devices, however, may already have the capacity for deep integration. Finally, we draw out some of the epistemic implications of our cognitive analysis.


  1. Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berners-Lee, T., et al. (2006). A framework for Web science. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 1(1), 1–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world back together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clowes, R. W. (2015). Thinking in the cloud: The cognitive integration of cloud-based technology. Philosophy and Technology, 28(2), 262–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Erll, A., & Rigney, A. (Eds.). (2009). Mediation, remediation, and the dynamics of cultural memory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Fallis, D. (2008). Towards an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halpin, H., Clark, A., & Wheeler, M. (2014). Towards a philosophy of the web: Representation, enaction, collective intelligence. In A. Monnin & H. Halpin (Eds.), Philosophical engineering: Toward a philosophy of the web (pp. 21–30). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, C. B, Keil, P. G., Sutton, J. & Barnier, A. J. (2010). Collaborative remembering: When can remembering with others be beneficial? In W. Christensen, E. Schier & J. Sutton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science (pp. 131–134).Google Scholar
  16. Hayles, N. K. (2012). How we think: Contemporary media and technogenesis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Head, A. J., & Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday. Scholar
  18. Heersmink, R. (2015). Dimensions of integration in embedded and extended cognitive systems. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heersmink, R. (2016). The Internet, cognitive enhancement, and the values of cognition. Minds and Machines, 26(4), 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heersmink, R. (2018). A virtue epistemology of the Internet: Search engines, intellectual virtues, and education. Social Epistemology, 32(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. London: SCM.Google Scholar
  22. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoskins, A. (2009). The mediatisation of memory. In J. Garde-Hansen, A. Hoskins, & A. Reading (Eds.), Save as … digital memories (pp. 27–43). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huebner, B. (2016). Transactive memory reconstructed: Rethinking Wegner’s research program. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 54(1), 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 20(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ludwig, D. (2015). Extended cognition and the explosion of knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 28(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch, M. (2016). The Internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  30. Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive integration: Mind and cognition unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menary, R. (2010). Dimensions of mind. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michaelian, K., & Arango-Muñoz, S. (2018). Collaborative memory knowledge: A distributed reliabilist perspective. In M. Meade, C. Harris, P. van Bergen, J. Sutton, & A. Barnier (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, applications (pp. 231–247). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Michaelian, K., & Sutton, J. (2013). Distributed cognition and memory research: History and current directions. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, B., & Record, I. (2013). Justified belief in a digital age: On the epistemic implications of secret internet technologies. Episteme, 10(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, B., & Record, I. (2017). Responsible epistemic technologies: A social-epistemological analysis of autocompleted web search. New Media and Society, 19(12), 1945–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Norman, D. (1998). The invisible computer. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pan, B., et al. (2007). In Google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(3), 801–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pew Research Center. (2011). Wikipedia, past and present. Retrieved from:
  39. Pew Research Center. (2015). Technology device ownership: 2015. Retrieved from:
  40. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Rowlands, M. (2009). Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive. Philosophical Psychology, 22(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, T. W. (2012). Evaluating Google as an epistemic tool. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smart, P. (2012). The web-extended mind. Metaphilosophy, 43(4), 446–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smart, P. (2017). Extended cognition and the Internet: A review of current issues and controversies. Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), 357–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smart, P., Clowes, R., & Heersmink, R. (2017a). Minds online: The interface between Web science, cognitive science, and the philosophy of mind. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 6(1–2), 1–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smart, P., Heersmink, R., & Clowes, R. (2017b). The cognitive ecology of the Internet. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (pp. 251–282). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smart, P., & Shadbolt, N. (2018). The World Wide Web. In J. Chase & D. Coady (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied epistemology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sterelny, K. (2010). Minds: Extended or scaffolded? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutton, J. (2006). Distributed cognition: Domains and dimensions. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sutton, J. (2010). Exograms and interdisciplinarity: History, the extended mind and the civilizing process. In R. Menary (Ed.), The extended mind (pp. 189–225). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutton, J. (2015a). Scaffolding memory: Themes, taxonomies, puzzles. In L. Bietti & C. B. Stone (Eds.), Contextualising human memory: An interdisciplinary approach to how individuals and groups remember their pasts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Sutton, J. (2015b). Remembering as public practice: Wittgenstein, memory, and distributed cognitive ecologies. In D. Moyal-Sharrock, A. Coliva, & V. Munz (Eds.), Mind, language, and action (pp. 409–443). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  54. Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Keil, P., & Barnier, A. J. (2010). The psychology of memory, extended cognition, and socially distributed remembering. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 521–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Theiner, G. (2013). Transactive memory systems: A mechanistic analysis of emergent group memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tollefson, D., Dale, R., & Paxton, A. (2013). Alignment, transactive memory, and collective cognitive systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2009). Using the Internet: Skill related problems in users’ online behavior. Interacting with Computers, 21(5–6), 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ward, A. F. (2013). Supernormal: How the Internet is changing our memories and our minds. Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behaviour (pp. 185–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  60. Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wegner, D., Erber, R., & Raymond, R. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In W. J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 253–276). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, R., & Clark, A. (2009). How to situate cognition: Letting nature take its course. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 55–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zagzebski, L. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics and PhilosophyLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Cognitive ScienceMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations