Erkenntnis

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 443–449

Simon Friederich: Interpreting Quantum Theory: A Therapeutic Approach

Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015, xiii + 202 pp
Book review

References

  1. Bell, J. S. (1990). La nouvelle cuisine. In A. Sarlemijn & P. Kroes (Eds.), Between science and technology (pp. 97–115). amsterdam: North-Holland (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2002). Quantum probabilities as bayesian probabilities. Phys Rev A, 65(2), 022,305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuchs, C. A. (2010). Qbism, the perimeter of quantum bayesianism. arXiv preprint arXiv:10035209
  4. Healey, R. (2012a). How to use quantum theory locally to explain “non-local” correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:12077064
  5. Healey, R. (2012b). Quantum theory: A pragmatist approach. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 729–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In R. C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability, Vol. II (pp. 263–293). California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Menzies, P., & Price, H. (1993). Causation as a secondary quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mermin, N. D. (1989). What’s wrong with this pillow? Physics Today, 42, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012). On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics, 8(6), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruetsche, L. (2011). Interpreting quantum theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie Heinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations