Advertisement

Erkenntnis

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 443–449 | Cite as

Simon Friederich: Interpreting Quantum Theory: A Therapeutic Approach

Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2015, xiii + 202 pp
  • Florian Boge
Book review
  • 297 Downloads

Simon Friederich’s Therapeutic Approach1 to quantum theory (QT) sheds new light on the status of the quantum state. In particular, Friederich presents revisionary ideas on how to exactly differentiate objective from subjective elements of the theory and thereby improves upon previous stabs at an epistemic interpretation of quantum states. The book not only provides interesting perspectives for the cognoscenti but is also written with sufficient care and free of unnecessary technicalities so as to be accessible and worth reading for the physical layman interested in the foundations of QT. The main achievement of the book is an innovative outline for interpreting quantum states epistemically while avoiding many problems of previous attempts.

Part I (chapters 1–3) introduces the general formalism along with the measurement problem (MP), argues that the collapse postulatedoes not provide a solution to the MP since an instantaneous, objective collapse raises well-known problems with...

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Simon Friederich for illuminating exchange on details of his book.

References

  1. Bell, J. S. (1990). La nouvelle cuisine. In A. Sarlemijn & P. Kroes (Eds.), Between science and technology (pp. 97–115). amsterdam: North-Holland (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caves, C. M., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2002). Quantum probabilities as bayesian probabilities. Phys Rev A, 65(2), 022,305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fuchs, C. A. (2010). Qbism, the perimeter of quantum bayesianism. arXiv preprint arXiv:10035209
  4. Healey, R. (2012a). How to use quantum theory locally to explain “non-local” correlations. arXiv preprint arXiv:12077064
  5. Healey, R. (2012b). Quantum theory: A pragmatist approach. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(4), 729–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. In R. C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability, Vol. II (pp. 263–293). California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Menzies, P., & Price, H. (1993). Causation as a secondary quality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mermin, N. D. (1989). What’s wrong with this pillow? Physics Today, 42, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012). On the reality of the quantum state. Nature Physics, 8(6), 475–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruetsche, L. (2011). Interpreting quantum theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie Heinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany

Personalised recommendations