Subset Realization and the Problem of Property Entailment
- First Online:
- 135 Downloads
Brian McLaughlin has objected to Sydney Shoemaker’s subset account of realization, posing what I call the problem of property entailment. Recently, Shoemaker has revised his subset account in response to McLaughlin’s objection. In this paper I argue that Shoemaker’s revised view fails to solve the problem of property entailment, and in fact makes the problem worse. I then put forward my own solution to the problem.
- McLaughlin, B. P. (2009). Review of Sydney Shoemaker. Physical Realization, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.Google Scholar
- Shoemaker, S. (1980). “Causality and Properties”, reprinted in Identity, Cause, and Mind: Philosophical Essays (Expanded Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shoemaker, S. (1981). “Some Varieties of Functionalism”, reprinted in Identity, cause, and mind: Philosophical essays (Expanded Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shoemaker, S. (2001). Realization and mental causation. In C. Gillett & B. Loewer (Eds.), Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar