Erkenntnis

, Volume 78, Supplement 1, pp 65–84 | Cite as

The Interventionist Account of Causation and Non-causal Association Laws

Article

Abstract

The key idea of the interventionist account of causation is that a variable A causes a variable B if and only if B would change if A were manipulated in an appropriate way. I argue that Woodward’s (Making things happen. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003) version of interventionism does not provide a sufficient condition for causation, insofar as it is not adequate for manipulations grounded on association laws. Such laws, which express relations of mutual dependence between variables, ground manipulative relationships which are not causal. I suggest that the interventionist analysis is sufficient for nomological dependence rather than for causation.

References

  1. Carnap, R. (1928). Der logische Aufbau der Welt (p. 1998). Felix Meiner: Hamburg.Google Scholar
  2. Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins, J., Hall, N., & Paul, L. A. (Eds.). (2004). Causation and counterfactuals. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cummins, R. (2000). How does it work? Versus what are the laws? Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In F. Keil & R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 117–145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ehring, D. (1987). Causal relata. Synthese, 73, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fair, D. (1979). Causation and the flow of energy. Erkenntnis, 14, 219–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, N. (2000/2004b), Causation and the price of transitivity, in Collins et al. (2004), pp. 181–204.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, N. (2004a), Two concepts of causation, in Collins et al. (2004), pp. 225–276.Google Scholar
  9. Hawley, K. (1999). Persistence and non-supervenient relations. Mind, 108, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hitchcock, C. (2001). The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kistler, M. (1998). Reducing causality to transmission. Erkenntnis, 48, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kistler, M. (2001a). Causation as transference and responsibility. In Wolfgang Spohn, Marion Ledwig, & Michael Esfeld (Eds.), Current issues in causation (pp. 115–133). Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  13. Kistler, M. (2001b). Le concept de génidentité chez Carnap et Russell. In Sandra Laugier (Ed.), Carnap et la construction logique du monde (pp. 163–188). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  14. Kistler, M. (2006). Causation and laws of nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. McDermott, M. (1995). Redundant causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 523–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paul, L. A. (2004), Aspect causation, in Collins et al. (2004), pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
  17. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. Erkenntnis, 57, 351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction and search (2nd ed.). Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Spirtes, P., & Scheines, R. (2004). Causal inference of ambiguous manipulations. Philosophy of Science, 71, 833–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spohn, W. (2001a), Bayesian nets are all there is to causal dependence, in M.C. Galavotti et al (eds.), Stochastic causality, Stanford: CSLI, and in W. Spohn, Causation, coherence, and concepts: A collection of essays, Springer 2009.Google Scholar
  22. Spohn, W. (2001b). Deterministic causation. In Wolfgang Spohn, Marion Ledwig, & Michael Esfeld (Eds.), Current issues in causation (pp. 21–46). Paderborn: Mentis.Google Scholar
  23. Spohn, W. (2006). Causation: An alternative. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Strevens, M. (2007). Review of Woodward. Making Things Happen, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 74, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strevens, M. (2008). Comments on Woodward. Making Things Happen, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Woodward, J. (2008a). Mental causation and neural mechanisms. In J. Hohwy & J. Kallestrup (Eds.), Being reduced (pp. 218–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Woodward, J. (2008b). Response to Strevens. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodward, J. (2011), Interventionism and causal exclusion, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8651.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IHPST, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations