Is There a Statistical Solution to the Generality Problem?
This article is concerned with a statistical proposal due to James R. Beebe for how to solve the generality problem for process reliabilism. The proposal is highlighted by Alvin I. Goldman as an interesting candidate solution. However, Goldman raises the worry that the proposal may not always yield a determinate result. We address this worry by proving a dilemma: either the statistical approach does not yield a determinate result or it leads to trivialization, i.e. reliability collapses into truth (and anti-reliability into falsehood). Various strategies for avoiding this predicament are considered, including revising the statistical rule or restricting its application to natural kinds. All amendments are seen to have serious problems of their own. We conclude that reliabilists need to look elsewhere for a convincing solution to the generality problem.
KeywordsTrue Belief Natural Kind Process Type Cognitive Architecture Relevant Type
- Alston, W. (1995). How to think about reliability. Philosophical Topics, 23(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
- Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldman, A. I. (1979). What is justified belief? In G. Pappas (Ed.), Justification and knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldman, A. I. (2008). Reliabilism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2008 Edition) URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/davidson/>.
- Hetherington, S. C. (1996). Knowledge puzzles: An introduction to epistemology. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Lycan, W. G. (1988). Judgment and justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. L. (1986). Contemporary theories of knowledge. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Pollock, J. L., & Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary theories of knowledge (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Ramsey, F. P. (1931). In R. B. Braithwaite (Ed.), The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Salmon, W. C. (1971). Statistical Explanation. In W. C. Salmon, R. Jeffrey, & J. Greeno (Eds.), Statistical explanation and statistical relevance. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar