Concepts of Supervenience Revisited
- 284 Downloads
Over the last 3 decades a vast literature has been dedicated to supervenience. Much of it has focused on the analysis of different concepts of supervenience and their philosophical consequences. This paper has two objectives. One is to provide a short, up-do-date, guide to the formal relations between the different concepts of supervenience. The other is to reassess the extent to which these concepts can establish metaphysical theses, especially about dependence. The conclusion is that strong global supervenience is the most advantageous notion of supervenience that we have.
Thanks to Vera Hoffmann, and to two anonymous referees of this Journal. This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation, Grant 725/08.
- Bennett, K., & McLaughlin, B. (2005). Supervenience. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/supervenience/.
- Burge, T. (1979). Individualism and the mental. In P. French, T. Euhling, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Studies in epistemology: Midwest studies in philosophy (Vol. 4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Donato, X., & Polanski, M. (2006). Supervenience, maximal properties and model theory. Theoria, 21, 257–276.Google Scholar
- Horgan, T. (1982). Supervenience and microphysics. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 63, 29–43.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. (1998). The mind-body problem after fifty years. In A. O’Hear (Ed.), Current issues in philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- McLaughlin, B. (1997). Supervenience, vagueness, and determination. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 209–230.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind and knowledge. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 7). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Stalnaker, R. (1996). Varieties of supervenience. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 221–241.Google Scholar