Erkenntnis

, Volume 78, Issue 6, pp 1259–1273

Is There a Space of Sensory Modalities?

Original Article

Abstract

Two proposals have recently, and independently, been made about a space of possible sensory modalities. In this paper I examine these different proposals, and offer one of my own. I suggest that there are several spaces associated with distinct kinds of sensory modality.

References

  1. Allen, K. (2009). Inter-species variation in colour perception. Philosophical Studies, 142, 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, A. (1993). Sensory qualities. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  3. Gray, R. (2005). On the concept of a sense. Synthese, 147, 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grice, P. (1962). Some remarks about the senses. In R. J. Butler (Ed.), Analytical philosophy (pp. 133–153). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Keeley, B. L. (2002). Making sense of the senses: Individuating modalities in humans and other animals. The Journal of Philosophy, 99, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Macpherson, F. (2011a). Taxonomizing the senses. Philosophical Studies, 153, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Macpherson, F. (2011b). Introduction: Individuating the senses. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), The senses: Classic and contemporary philosophical perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  8. Macpherson, F. (forthcoming) The space of sensory modalities. In D. Stokes, S. Biggs & M. Matthen (Eds.), Perception and its modalities. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  9. Nudds, M. (2003). The significance of the senses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ross, P. (2008). Common sense about qualia and the senses. Philosophical Studies, 138, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwab, I. (2011). Evolution’s witness: How eyes evolved. New York: OUP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations