, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 187–196

A Reliabilist Foundationalist Coherentism

Original Article


While Process Reliabilism has long been regarded by many as a version of Foundationalism, this paper argues that there is a version of Process Reliabilism that can also been seen as at least a partial vindication of Coherentism as well. The significance of this result lies in what it tells us both about the prospects for a plausible Process Reliabilism, but also about the old-school debate between Foundationalists and Coherentists.


  1. Audi, R. (1997). The place of testimony in the fabric of knowledge and justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(4), 405–422.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K. (1984). Default reasoning: jumping to conclusions and knowing when to think twice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 37–58.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, K. (1985). A rationale for reliabilism. The Monist, 68(2), 248–263.Google Scholar
  4. Bonjour, L. (1980). Externalist theories of empirical knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, S. (2002). Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fodor, J. (2002). The mind doesn’t work that way: the scopes and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman, A. (1979). What is justified belief? In G. Pappas (Ed.), Justification and knowledge (pp. 1–23). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Haack, S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Harman, G. (1973). Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harman, G. (1980). Reasoning and explanatory coherence. American Philosophical Quarterly, 17, 151–157.Google Scholar
  13. Henderson, D., & Horgan, T. (2000). Iceberg epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61(3), 497–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (1995). Connectionism and the Commitments of Folk Psychology. In J. Tomberlin (Ed.), AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology. Ridgeview: Atascadero.Google Scholar
  15. Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (1996). Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lyons, J. (2009). Perception and basic beliefs: zombies, modules, and the problem of the external world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Vogel, J. (2000). Reliabilism leveled. Journal of Philosophy, 97, 602–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations