, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 391–411

Remembering (Short-Term) Memory: Oscillations of an Epistemic Thing



This paper provides an interpretation of Hans-Jörg Rheinberger’s notions of epistemic things and historical epistemology. I argue that Rheinberger’s approach articulates a unique contribution to current debates about integrated HPS, and I propose some modifications and extensions of this contribution. Drawing on examples from memory research, I show that Rheinberger is right to highlight a particular feature of many objects of empirical research (“epistemic things”)—especially in the contexts of exploratory experimentation—namely our lack of knowledge about them. I argue that this analysis needs to be supplemented with an account of what scientists do know, and in particular, how they are able to attribute rudimentary empirical contours to objects of research. These contours are closely connected to paradigmatic research designs, which in turn are tied to basic methodological rules for the exploration of the purported phenomena. I suggest that we engage with such rules in order to develop our own normative (epistemological) categories, and I tie this proposal to the idea of a methodological naturalism in philosophy of science.


  1. Abel, G. (2010). Epistemische Objekte als Zeichen- und Interpretationskonstrukte. In S. Tolksdorf & H. Tetens (Eds.), In Sprachspiele verstrickt. Oder: Wie man der Fliege den Ausweg zeigt (pp. 127–156). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabatzis, T. (2006). Representing electrons: A biographical approach to theoretical entities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arabatzis, T. (2011). On the historicity of scientific objects. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9344-5.
  4. Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R., & Shiffrin, R. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 224, 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 49–90). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A., & Warrington, E. (1970). Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature. Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, H. (2011). The persistence of epistemic objects through scientific change. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9340-9.
  10. Cohen, N., & Squire, L. (1980). Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. Science, 210, 207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conway, A., Kane, M., Bunting, M., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin, 12(5), 769–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowan, N. (2010). Multiple concurrent thoughts: The meaning and developmental neuropsychology of working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(5), 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danziger, K. (2008). Marking the mind. A history of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Daston, L. (1999). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Engle, R. W., Tuholsky, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feest, U. (2005). Operationism in psychology—what the debate is about, what the debate should be about. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, XLI(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feest, U. (2010). Concepts as tools in the experimental generation of knowledge in cognitive neuropsychology. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feest, U. (2011a). What Exactly is stabilized when phenomena are stabilized? Synthese, 182(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
  22. Feest, U. (2011b). The experimenters’ regress reconsidered: Mitigated skepticism, tacit knowledge, and the generation of scientific knowledge (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  23. Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M., & Sledge Moore, K. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kane, M., Conway, A., Miura, T., & Colflesh, J. H. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitcher, P. (2011). Epistemology without history is blind. Erkenntnis. doi:10.1007/s10670-011-9334-7.
  26. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lockhart, R. S. (2000). Methods of memory research. In E. Tulving & F. Craik (Eds.), The oxford handbook of memory (pp. 45–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Méthot, P.-O. (2011). From concepts to experimental systems. Trends in historical epistemology. In H. Schmidgen, P. Schöttler & J. F. Braunstein (Eds.), History and epistemology. From Bachelard and Canguilhem to today's history of science. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  30. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, G., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. (1969). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehat and Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Nee, D., & Jonides, J. (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(37), 14228–14233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nimtz, C. (2005). Reassessing referential indetermnacy. Erkenntnis, 62(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owen, A. M., McKillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Papineau, D. (2009). Naturalism. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2009 edn),
  36. Peters, M., Jelicic, M., Verbeek, H., & Merckelbach, H. (2007). Poor working memory predicts false memories. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reichenbach, H. (1965 [1920]). The theory of relativity and a priori knowledge. Berkeley & L.A.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rheinberger, H.-J. (1997). Towards a history of epistemic things. Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2001). Experimentalsysteme und epistemische Dinge. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
  40. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2005). A reply to Bloor: ‘Toward a sociology of epistemic things’. Perspectives on Science, 13, 406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2006). Epistemologie des Konkreten. Studien zur Geschichte der modernen Biologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  42. Ricker, T., AuBuchon, A., & Cowan, N. (2010). Working memory. Wires: Cognitive Science, 1, 573–585.Google Scholar
  43. Roediger, H. L., & Goff, L. M. (1999). Chapter 17: Memory. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.), A companion to cognitive science (pp. 250–264). Blackwell: Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  44. Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter. Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sanchez, C. A. (2011). Working through pain: Working memory capacity and differences in processing and storage under pain. Memory, 19(2), 226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schacter, D. (1990). Introduction to ‘Implicit Memory: Multiple perspectives’. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(4), 338–340.Google Scholar
  47. Schickore, J. (2011). More thoughts on HPS. Another 20 years later. Perspectives on Science, 19(4), 453–481.Google Scholar
  48. Steinle, F. (1997). Entering new fields: Exploratory uses of experimentation. Philosophy of Science, 64, S65–S74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stotz, K., Griffiths, P. E., & Knight, R. (2004). How scientists conceptualise genes: An empirical study. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(4), 647–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sullivan, J. (2009). The multiplicity of experimental protocols: A challenge to reductionist and non-reductionist models of the unity of neuroscience. Synthese, 167, 511–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Turner, M., & Engle, R. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber, M. (2006). Die Geschichte wissenschaftlicher Dinge als Epistemologie. Nach Feierabend. Zürcher Jahrbuch für Wissensgeschichte, 2, 181–190.Google Scholar
  54. Wingfield, A., Stine, E., Lahar, C., & Aberdeen, J. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age. Experimental Aging Research, 14(2), 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Philosophie, Literatur-, Wissenschafts- und TechnikgeschichteTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations